Raj N B, Kellum M, Kelley K A, Antrobus S, Pitha P M
J Interferon Res. 1985 Summer;5(3):493-510. doi: 10.1089/jir.1985.5.493.
We have examined the molecular mechanisms involved in the induction and regulation of expression of alpha and beta 1 human interferons (HuIFN) in Namalva cells. Cloned IFN-alpha and -beta 1 cDNAs, and antisera to purified IFN-alpha and -beta 1 were used as specific probes to determine the expression of HuIFN genes both on the RNA and protein levels. The rates of gene transcription were correlated with the relative levels of HuIFN mRNA present in induced cells and with the amounts of HuIFN peptides synthesized by these cells. The comparative rate of transcription of HuIFN-alpha and -beta 1 genes was measured in nuclei isolated from Namalva cells before and after induction. No transcription of HuIFN-alpha and -beta 1 genes was detected in nuclei isolated from the uninduced cells. The correspondence in the rate of HuIFN-alpha and -beta 1 genes transcription after virus infection with the relative levels of HuIFN mRNA in the induced cells indicates that the stimulation of HuIFN synthesis by viral infection results from the activation of the transcription of HuIFN genes. The relative levels of alpha and beta 1 induced transcripts were the same in spite of the differences in the number of copies of HuIFN-alpha and -beta 1 genes indicating that the beta 1 gene is transcribed more efficiently than the alpha genes. The steady-state levels of HuIFN-alpha and -beta 1 mRNAs in induced Namalva cells are comparable, however, the overall amount of HuIFN-beta 1 synthesized (as determined by radioimmunoassay and biological activity) is approximately 10-fold lower than that of IFN-alpha. No evidence has been found that would indicate that HuIFN-beta 1 mRNA induced in Namalva cells is different from that induced in human fibroblasts. The data indicate, however, that in Namalva cells, the IFN-beta 1 polypeptide has a higher turnover rate and slower rate of release into medium than the HuIFN-alpha polypeptides, indicating that the observed difference in the overall amounts of these two types of interferons present in the medium is due to regulation on posttranslational level.
我们研究了Namalva细胞中α和β1人干扰素(HuIFN)表达的诱导和调控所涉及的分子机制。克隆的IFN-α和-β1 cDNA,以及针对纯化的IFN-α和-β1的抗血清被用作特异性探针,以在RNA和蛋白质水平上确定HuIFN基因的表达。基因转录速率与诱导细胞中存在的HuIFN mRNA的相对水平以及这些细胞合成的HuIFN肽的量相关。在诱导前后从Namalva细胞分离的细胞核中测量了HuIFN-α和-β1基因的比较转录速率。从未诱导细胞分离的细胞核中未检测到HuIFN-α和-β1基因的转录。病毒感染后HuIFN-α和-β1基因转录速率与诱导细胞中HuIFN mRNA相对水平的对应关系表明,病毒感染对HuIFN合成的刺激源于HuIFN基因转录的激活。尽管HuIFN-α和-β1基因的拷贝数不同,但α和β1诱导转录本的相对水平相同,这表明β1基因的转录效率高于α基因。在诱导的Namalva细胞中,HuIFN-α和-β1 mRNA的稳态水平相当,然而,合成的HuIFN-β1的总量(通过放射免疫测定和生物活性确定)比IFN-α低约10倍。没有发现证据表明Namalva细胞中诱导的HuIFN-β1 mRNA与人类成纤维细胞中诱导的不同。然而,数据表明,在Namalva细胞中,IFN-β1多肽的周转速率较高,释放到培养基中的速率比HuIFN-α多肽慢,这表明在培养基中这两种类型干扰素总量的观察到的差异是由于翻译后水平的调控。