• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动物园动物的认知偏差:福利评估的乐观前景

Cognitive Bias in Zoo Animals: An Optimistic Outlook for Welfare Assessment.

作者信息

Clegg Isabella L K

机构信息

Animal Welfare Expertise (www.animalwelfareexpertise.com), 81 Alderney St, London SW1V 4HF, UK.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2018 Jun 27;8(7):104. doi: 10.3390/ani8070104.

DOI:10.3390/ani8070104
PMID:29954151
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6071086/
Abstract

Cognitive bias testing measures how emotional states can affect cognitive processes, often described using the “glass half-full/half-empty” paradigm. Classical or operant conditioning is used to measure responses to ambiguous cues, and it has been reported across many species and contexts that an animal’s cognitive bias can be directly linked to welfare state, e.g., those in better welfare make more optimistic judgements. Cognitive bias testing has only recently been applied to animals and represents a key milestone in welfare science: it is currently one of the only accurate methods available to measure welfare. The tests have been conducted on many farm, laboratory, and companion animal species, but have only been carried out in zoo settings a handful of times. The aims of this review are to evaluate the feasibility of cognitive bias testing in zoos and its potential as a tool for studying zoo animal welfare. The few existing zoo cognitive bias studies are reviewed, as well as those conducted on similar, non-domesticated species. This work is then used to discuss how tests could be successfully designed and executed in zoo settings, which types of tests are most appropriate in different contexts, and how the data could be used to improve animal welfare. The review closely examines the many variables are present in the zoo which cannot be controlled as in other settings, termed here the Zoo Environment (ZE) Variables. It is recommended that tests are developed after consideration of each of the ZE Variables, and through strong collaboration between zookeepers, managers, and academic institutions. There is much unexplored potential of cognitive bias testing in the zoo setting, not least its use in investigating animal welfare in zoos. It is hoped that this review will stimulate increased interest in this topic from zoo managers, scientists, and industry regulators alike.

摘要

认知偏差测试衡量情绪状态如何影响认知过程,通常用“杯子是半满还是半空”的范式来描述。经典条件反射或操作性条件反射被用于测量对模糊线索的反应,并且在许多物种和情境中都有报道称,动物的认知偏差可以直接与福利状况相关联,例如,福利状况较好的动物会做出更乐观的判断。认知偏差测试直到最近才应用于动物,这代表了福利科学中的一个关键里程碑:它是目前可用的少数几种准确测量福利的方法之一。这些测试已经在许多农场动物、实验动物和伴侣动物物种上进行,但在动物园环境中只进行过几次。本综述的目的是评估在动物园中进行认知偏差测试的可行性及其作为研究动物园动物福利工具的潜力。本文回顾了现有的少数几项动物园认知偏差研究,以及对类似的非家养物种进行的研究。然后利用这些研究成果讨论如何在动物园环境中成功设计和实施测试,在不同情境下哪种类型的测试最合适,以及如何利用这些数据来改善动物福利。该综述仔细研究了动物园中存在的许多无法像在其他环境中那样进行控制的变量,在此称为动物园环境(ZE)变量。建议在考虑每个ZE变量并通过动物园饲养员、管理人员和学术机构之间的紧密合作后开发测试。动物园环境中的认知偏差测试有很大的未开发潜力,尤其是其在调查动物园动物福利方面的应用。希望本综述能激发动物园管理人员、科学家和行业监管机构对这一主题的更多兴趣。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/592b/6071086/3bd41bd511e6/animals-08-00104-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/592b/6071086/3bd41bd511e6/animals-08-00104-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/592b/6071086/3bd41bd511e6/animals-08-00104-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Cognitive Bias in Zoo Animals: An Optimistic Outlook for Welfare Assessment.动物园动物的认知偏差:福利评估的乐观前景
Animals (Basel). 2018 Jun 27;8(7):104. doi: 10.3390/ani8070104.
2
Assessment of Welfare in Zoo Animals: Towards Optimum Quality of Life.动物园动物福利评估:迈向最佳生活质量
Animals (Basel). 2018 Jul 4;8(7):110. doi: 10.3390/ani8070110.
3
Animal-based welfare monitoring: using keeper ratings as an assessment tool.基于动物的福利监测:使用饲养员评分作为评估工具。
Zoo Biol. 2009 Nov;28(6):545-60. doi: 10.1002/zoo.20281.
4
Determining Connections between the Daily Lives of Zoo Elephants and Their Welfare: An Epidemiological Approach.确定动物园大象日常生活与福利之间的联系:一种流行病学方法。
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 14;11(7):e0158124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158124. eCollection 2016.
5
Zoo Animal Welfare Assessment: Where Do We Stand?动物园动物福利评估:我们目前的状况如何?
Animals (Basel). 2023 Jun 12;13(12):1966. doi: 10.3390/ani13121966.
6
Using Zoo Welfare Assessments to Identify Common Issues in Developing Country Zoos.利用动物园福利评估来识别发展中国家动物园的常见问题。
Animals (Basel). 2020 Nov 12;10(11):2101. doi: 10.3390/ani10112101.
7
A "How-To" Guide for Designing Judgment Bias Studies to Assess Captive Animal Welfare.评估圈养动物福利的判断偏差研究设计实用指南。
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2015;18 Suppl 1:S18-42. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2015.1075833.
8
[Cognitive enrichment in zoo and farm animals--implications for animal behaviour and welfare].[动物园和农场动物的认知强化——对动物行为和福利的影响]
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2010 Nov-Dec;123(11-12):446-56.
9
Zoo studies in primate physiology, health, and welfare.灵长类动物生理学、健康与福利方面的动物园研究。
Am J Primatol. 2023 Mar;85(3):e23476. doi: 10.1002/ajp.23476. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
10
Use of cognitive bias as a welfare tool in poultry.利用认知偏差作为家禽福利工具。
J Anim Sci. 2020 Aug 18;98(Supplement_1):S63-S79. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa039.

引用本文的文献

1
Modifying the Attention Bias Test to Assess the Emotional State of Dogs.修改注意力偏差测试以评估犬类的情绪状态。
Animals (Basel). 2025 Mar 14;15(6):840. doi: 10.3390/ani15060840.
2
Tarantula welfare may be improved with greater environmental complexity: A preliminary behavioral study with Brazilian black tarantulas (Grammastola pulchra).增加环境复杂性可能改善狼蛛的健康状况:一项针对巴西黑狼蛛(Grammastola pulchra)的初步行为学研究
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 5;19(12):e0314501. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314501. eCollection 2024.
3
Are lateralized and bold fish optimistic or pessimistic?

本文引用的文献

1
Environmental complexity buffers against stress-induced negative judgement bias in female chickens.环境复杂性缓冲了应激引起的雌性鸡的负面判断偏差。
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 29;8(1):5404. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23545-6.
2
A cross-species judgement bias task: integrating active trial initiation into a spatial Go/No-go task.一种跨物种判断偏差任务:将主动试验启动整合到空间 Go/No-go 任务中。
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 23;8(1):5104. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23459-3.
3
Mood As Cumulative Expectation Mismatch: A Test of Theory Based on Data from Non-verbal Cognitive Bias Tests.
侧化且大胆的鱼是乐观还是悲观?
Anim Cogn. 2024 Jun 4;27(1):42. doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01876-4.
4
Cognitive tasks as measures of pig welfare: a systematic review.作为猪福利衡量指标的认知任务:一项系统综述。
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Nov 13;10:1251070. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1251070. eCollection 2023.
5
Aquarium Visitors Catch Some Rays: Rays Are More Active in the Presence of More Visitors.水族馆游客享受阳光:游客越多,鳐鱼越活跃。
Animals (Basel). 2023 Nov 15;13(22):3526. doi: 10.3390/ani13223526.
6
Acoustic Monitoring of Professionally Managed Marine Mammals for Health and Welfare Insights.对专业管理的海洋哺乳动物进行声学监测以获取健康和福利方面的见解。
Animals (Basel). 2023 Jun 27;13(13):2124. doi: 10.3390/ani13132124.
7
Zoo Animal Welfare Assessment: Where Do We Stand?动物园动物福利评估:我们目前的状况如何?
Animals (Basel). 2023 Jun 12;13(12):1966. doi: 10.3390/ani13121966.
8
The Benefits and Challenges of Conducting Primate Research in Different Settings.在不同环境下进行灵长类动物研究的益处与挑战。
Animals (Basel). 2022 Dec 29;13(1):133. doi: 10.3390/ani13010133.
9
Apex and ApeTouch: Development of a Portable Touchscreen System and Software for Primates at Zoos.顶点与猿类触摸:为动物园灵长类动物开发的便携式触摸屏系统及软件
Animals (Basel). 2022 Jun 28;12(13):1660. doi: 10.3390/ani12131660.
10
Welfare Assessment Tools in Zoos: From Theory to Practice.动物园中的福利评估工具:从理论到实践
Vet Sci. 2022 Apr 1;9(4):170. doi: 10.3390/vetsci9040170.
情绪作为累积期望不匹配:基于非言语认知偏差测试数据的理论检验
Front Psychol. 2017 Dec 14;8:2197. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02197. eCollection 2017.
4
Cognitive judgement bias is associated with frequency of anticipatory behavior in bottlenose dolphins.认知判断偏差与宽吻海豚预期行为的频率相关。
Zoo Biol. 2018 Mar;37(2):67-73. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21400. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
5
Pessimism and fearfulness in dairy calves.奶牛犊牛的悲观和恐惧。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 23;8(1):1421. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17214-3.
6
Towards a more practical attention bias test to assess affective state in sheep.迈向一种更实用的注意力偏差测试,以评估绵羊的情感状态。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 2;13(1):e0190404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190404. eCollection 2018.
7
Assessment of housing density, space allocation and social hierarchy of laboratory rats on behavioural measures of welfare.基于行为学福利指标评估实验大鼠的饲养密度、空间分配及社会等级。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 19;12(9):e0185135. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185135. eCollection 2017.
8
Ambiguous Results When Using the Ambiguous-Cue Paradigm to Assess Learning and Cognitive Bias in Gorillas and a Black Bear.使用模糊线索范式评估大猩猩和一只黑熊的学习与认知偏差时的模糊结果。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2017 Aug 9;7(3):51. doi: 10.3390/bs7030051.
9
Studying primate cognition in a social setting to improve validity and welfare: a literature review highlighting successful approaches.在社会环境中研究灵长类动物认知以提高有效性和福利:一篇强调成功方法的文献综述
PeerJ. 2017 Aug 3;5:e3649. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3649. eCollection 2017.
10
A turtle cognition research demonstration enhances visitor engagement and keeper-animal relationships.一项海龟认知研究展示增强了游客的参与度以及饲养员与动物之间的关系。
Zoo Biol. 2017 Jul;36(4):243-249. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21373. Epub 2017 Jun 18.