Suppr超能文献

非甾体抗炎药超敏反应——诊断检查及患者管理建议

NSAID hypersensitivity - recommendations for diagnostic work up and patient management.

作者信息

Wöhrl Stefan

机构信息

Floridsdorf Allergy Center (FAZ), Pius-Parsch-Platz 1/3, 1210 Vienna, Austria.

2Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Allergo J Int. 2018;27(4):114-121. doi: 10.1007/s40629-018-0064-0. Epub 2018 May 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adverse drug reactions (ADR) to analgesics (i.e., non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug hypersensitivity, NSAID-HS) are one of the most common ADR, affecting approximately 1.6% of all patients. Despite the fact that they are common, they still pose a diagnostic challenge.

METHODS

This article is an overview of selected scientific articles and is based on research in PubMed, specialist databases, and guidelines.

RESULTS

Approximately 80% of side effects are pharmacologically predictable and are classified as type A reactions, such as abdominal pain and bleeding events. More advanced diagnostic investigations are not useful in such cases. Type B reactions, which account for the remaining 20%, are subdivided into the far more frequent cross-reactive, non-immunological NSAID-HS (acronyms NERD [NSAID exacerbated respiratory disease], NECD [NSAID exacerbated cutaneous disease], NIUA [NSAID-induced urticaria/angioedema]) and the much rarer true drug allergies of type I and IV (acronyms SNIUAA [single NSAID-induced urticara/angioedema or anaphylaxis] and SNIDR [single NSAID-induced delayed reaction]). The two latter are not cross-reactive and all other NSAIDs are generally well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic work-up begins with a detailed patient's history. Skin tests are only useful in SNIDR and SNIUAA, while in vitro tests are helpful merely in exceptional cases. In general, the diagnosis can only be confirmed by provocation testing, when required. Although cross-reactivity is usually present, provocation testing is often able to find an alternative, tolerable analgesic. Individual patient management usually enables a solution to be found for most patients.

摘要

背景

镇痛药的药物不良反应(ADR,即非甾体抗炎药超敏反应,NSAID-HS)是最常见的ADR之一,影响约1.6%的所有患者。尽管它们很常见,但仍构成诊断挑战。

方法

本文是对选定科学文章的概述,基于PubMed、专业数据库和指南中的研究。

结果

约80%的副作用在药理学上是可预测的,归类为A型反应,如腹痛和出血事件。在这种情况下,更先进的诊断检查并无用处。占其余20%的B型反应可细分为更常见的交叉反应性、非免疫性NSAID-HS(首字母缩写词NERD [NSAID加重的呼吸道疾病]、NECD [NSAID加重的皮肤疾病]、NIUA [NSAID诱导的荨麻疹/血管性水肿])以及罕见得多的I型和IV型真正药物过敏(首字母缩写词SNIUAA [单一NSAID诱导的荨麻疹/血管性水肿或过敏反应]和SNIDR [单一NSAID诱导的迟发反应])。后两者无交叉反应,所有其他NSAID通常耐受性良好。

结论

诊断检查从详细的患者病史开始。皮肤试验仅对SNIDR和SNIUAA有用,而体外试验仅在特殊情况下有帮助。一般来说,只有在必要时通过激发试验才能确诊。尽管通常存在交叉反应,但激发试验往往能够找到一种可耐受的替代镇痛药。个体化患者管理通常能为大多数患者找到解决方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f6f/6004000/527ae2af7e59/40629_2018_64_Fig3_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验