• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术与传统显微镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的系统评价和 Meta 分析。

Transforaminal endoscopic discectomy versus conventional microdiscectomy for lumbar discherniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, No. 154 Anshan Road, Heping District, Tianjin, 300052, People's Republic of China.

Department of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University General Hospital, No. 23 Qingnian Road, Zhanggong District, Ganzhou, 341000, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Jul 5;13(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0868-0.

DOI:10.1186/s13018-018-0868-0
PMID:29976224
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6034279/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The open microdiscectomy is the most common surgical procedure for the decompression of radiculopathy caused by lumbar disk herniation. To date, a variety of minimally invasive (MI) techniques have been developed. In the last decades, endoscopic techniques have been developed to perform discectomy. The transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (TED) with posterolateral access evolved out of the development of endoscopic techniques.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for trials written in English. The randomized trials and observational studies that met our inclusion criteria were subsequently included. Two reviewers respectively extracted data and estimated the risk of bias. All statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.3.

RESULTS

Five prospective and four retrospective studies involving 1527 patients were included. The results of the meta-analysis indicated that there were significant differences between the two groups in length of hospital stay (MD = - 8.41, 95% CI - 10.26, - 6.56; p value < 0.00001). However, there were no significant differences in the leg visual analog scale (VAS) scores, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, and the incidence of complications and recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

The transforaminal endoscopic discectomy is superior to open microdiscectomy in the length of hospital stay. However, there were no differences in leg pain, functional recovery, and incidence of complications between TED and MD in treating LDH.

摘要

背景

开放式微椎间盘切除术是治疗腰椎间盘突出症引起的神经根病最常见的手术方法。迄今为止,已经开发出了各种微创 (MI) 技术。在过去的几十年中,已经开发出了内镜技术来进行椎间盘切除术。经椎间孔内窥镜椎间盘切除术 (TED) 经后外侧入路是内镜技术发展的结果。

方法

使用 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库对用英文撰写的试验进行了系统的文献检索。随后纳入符合我们纳入标准的随机试验和观察性研究。两位审阅者分别提取数据并评估偏倚风险。所有统计分析均使用 Review Manager 5.3 进行。

结果

纳入了 5 项前瞻性研究和 4 项回顾性研究,共涉及 1527 名患者。荟萃分析的结果表明,两组在住院时间(MD = - 8.41,95%CI - 10.26,- 6.56;p 值 < 0.00001)方面存在显著差异。然而,两组在腿部视觉模拟量表 (VAS) 评分、Oswestry 残疾指数 (ODI) 评分以及并发症和复发发生率方面均无显著差异。

结论

经椎间孔内窥镜椎间盘切除术在住院时间方面优于开放式微椎间盘切除术。然而,在治疗腰椎间盘突出症时,TED 与 MD 在腿部疼痛、功能恢复和并发症发生率方面并无差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77fd/6034279/daafbc73f70f/13018_2018_868_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77fd/6034279/26ab9178a3ee/13018_2018_868_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77fd/6034279/0e76c3fd6974/13018_2018_868_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77fd/6034279/76aaaa0e7fca/13018_2018_868_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77fd/6034279/d0e1362d143f/13018_2018_868_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77fd/6034279/41b988f368fa/13018_2018_868_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77fd/6034279/82ac7c3d0777/13018_2018_868_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77fd/6034279/6292b765540a/13018_2018_868_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77fd/6034279/daafbc73f70f/13018_2018_868_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77fd/6034279/26ab9178a3ee/13018_2018_868_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77fd/6034279/0e76c3fd6974/13018_2018_868_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77fd/6034279/76aaaa0e7fca/13018_2018_868_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77fd/6034279/d0e1362d143f/13018_2018_868_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77fd/6034279/41b988f368fa/13018_2018_868_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77fd/6034279/82ac7c3d0777/13018_2018_868_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77fd/6034279/6292b765540a/13018_2018_868_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77fd/6034279/daafbc73f70f/13018_2018_868_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Transforaminal endoscopic discectomy versus conventional microdiscectomy for lumbar discherniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术与传统显微镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的系统评价和 Meta 分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Jul 5;13(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0868-0.
2
Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy, microendoscopic discectomy, and microdiscectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation: minimum 2-year follow-up results.经皮内镜下经椎间孔椎间盘切除术、显微内镜下椎间盘切除术和显微椎间盘切除术治疗症状性腰椎间盘突出症的比较:至少2年的随访结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):317-325. doi: 10.3171/2017.6.SPINE172. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
3
Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Versus Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy: A Comparative Cohort Study with a 5-Year Follow-Up.经皮椎间孔镜腰椎间盘切除术与开放腰椎显微切除术的比较:一项 5 年随访的对照队列研究。
Pain Physician. 2019 May;22(3):295-304.
4
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Versus Posterior Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy for the Treatment of Symptomatic Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术与后路开放式腰椎显微椎间盘切除术治疗有症状的腰椎间盘突出症:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
World Neurosurg. 2018 Dec;120:352-362. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.236. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
5
A Comparison of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy and Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation in the Korean: A Meta-Analysis.经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术与开放式腰椎显微切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Aug 7;2018:9073460. doi: 10.1155/2018/9073460. eCollection 2018.
6
Meta-analysis of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy vs. fenestration discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation.经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术与开窗髓核摘除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的Meta分析
Orthopade. 2018 Jul;47(7):574-584. doi: 10.1007/s00132-018-3528-5.
7
Unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy versus microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.单侧双通道内镜下椎间盘切除术与显微椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的系统评价和Meta分析
Eur Spine J. 2024 Jun;33(6):2139-2153. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-08116-2. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
8
Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy versus Micro-Endoscopic Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation.经皮椎间孔内镜椎间盘切除术与微创经皮内镜椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较。
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Mar 30;25:2320-2328. doi: 10.12659/MSM.913326.
9
A meta-analysis of interlaminar minimally invasive discectomy compared to conventional microdiscectomy for lumbar disk herniation.一项关于层间微创椎间盘切除术与传统显微椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的荟萃分析。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014 Dec;127:149-57. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.10.001. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
10
Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus open lumbar microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: A meta-analysis.经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术与开放腰椎显微切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较:Meta 分析。
Int J Surg. 2016 Jul;31:86-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.05.061. Epub 2016 May 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Strategies to Reduce Rebound Pain and Facilitate Early Recovery After Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy.减少经椎间孔内镜下腰椎间盘切除术后反弹痛并促进早期恢复的策略
J Clin Med. 2025 May 18;14(10):3529. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103529.
2
Full-Endoscopic Spine Surgery : Its Roles and Limitations.全内镜脊柱手术:其作用与局限性
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2025 Sep;68(5):511-527. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2024.0227. Epub 2025 May 8.
3
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predictors of Surgical Difficulty in Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Far-Lateral Disc Herniation Under Local Anesthesia.

本文引用的文献

1
A randomised controlled trial of transforaminal endoscopic discectomy vs microdiscectomy.经椎间孔内镜下椎间盘切除术与显微椎间盘切除术的随机对照试验
Eur Spine J. 2017 Mar;26(3):847-856. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4885-6. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
2
Serum creatine phosphokinase levels as an indicator of muscle injury following lumbar disc surgery: Comparison of fully endoscopic discectomy and microdiscectomy.血清肌酸磷酸激酶水平作为腰椎间盘手术后肌肉损伤的指标:全内镜下椎间盘切除术与显微椎间盘切除术的比较
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016 Jun;145:74-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 Apr 9.
3
Comparison of Outcomes of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy and Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy for Young Adults: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study.
局部麻醉下经椎间孔内镜腰椎间盘切除术治疗极外侧椎间盘突出症手术难度的磁共振成像预测因素
Biomedicines. 2025 Mar 23;13(4):778. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13040778.
4
The utilization of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy in recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术在复发性腰椎间盘突出症中的应用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Spine Surg. 2025 Mar 24;11(1):45-64. doi: 10.21037/jss-24-47. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
5
Comparative efficacy and safety of three surgical procedures for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a Bayesian-based network analysis.三种治疗腰椎间盘突出症手术方法的疗效与安全性比较:基于贝叶斯的网络分析
BMC Surg. 2025 Mar 28;25(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02856-2.
6
Access Pain During Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Foraminal or Extraforaminal Disc Herniation.经椎间孔内镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗椎间孔或椎间孔外椎间盘突出症时的入路疼痛
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Oct 21;14(20):2337. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14202337.
7
biomechanical evaluation of the application of a novel annulus closure device to closure of annulus fibrosus.一种新型纤维环闭合装置应用于纤维环闭合的生物力学评估。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Jun 4;12:1337269. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1337269. eCollection 2024.
8
A 2-Year Outcomes and Complications of Various Techniques of Lumbar Discectomy: A Multicentric Prospective Study.腰椎间盘切除术不同技术的2年疗效及并发症:一项多中心前瞻性研究
Global Spine J. 2025 Mar;15(2):1003-1012. doi: 10.1177/21925682231220042. Epub 2023 Dec 9.
9
Propensity matched outcome analysis following microdiscectomy versus interlaminar endoscopic discectomy for L5-S1 disc herniation.L5-S1椎间盘突出症行显微椎间盘切除术与椎板间内镜下椎间盘切除术的倾向评分匹配结果分析
J Orthop. 2023 Jul 18;42:87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.07.006. eCollection 2023 Aug.
10
Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus open lumbar microdiscectomy for treating lumbar disc herniation: Using the survival analysis.经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术与开放性腰椎显微椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症:采用生存分析
Tzu Chi Med J. 2023 Feb 13;35(3):237-241. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_262_22. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.
经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术与开放腰椎显微椎间盘切除术治疗年轻成年人的疗效比较:一项回顾性匹配队列研究。
World Neurosurg. 2016 Feb;86:250-8. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.09.047. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
4
Outcome of single level disc prolapse treated with transforaminal steroid versus epidural steroid versus caudal steroids.经椎间孔注射类固醇、硬膜外注射类固醇与骶管注射类固醇治疗单节段椎间盘突出症的疗效比较
Eur Spine J. 2016 Jan;25(1):217-221. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3996-9. Epub 2015 May 12.
5
Long-term follow-up of standard microdiscectomy versus minimal access surgery for lumbar disc herniations.标准微创手术与微创入路手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的长期随访结果。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2013 Dec;155(12):2333-8. doi: 10.1007/s00701-013-1901-z. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
6
Trend of the incidence of lumbar disc herniation: decreasing with aging in the elderly.腰椎间盘突出症发病率趋势:老年人随年龄增长而下降。
Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:1047-50. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S49698. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
7
Surgery versus prolonged conservative treatment for sciatica: 5-year results of a randomised controlled trial.手术与保守治疗坐骨神经痛的比较:一项随机对照试验的 5 年结果。
BMJ Open. 2013 May 28;3(5):e002534. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002534.
8
Exiting root injury in transforaminal endoscopic discectomy: preoperative image considerations for safety.经椎间孔内镜下椎间盘切除术的神经根出口损伤:安全的术前影像考量
Eur Spine J. 2013 Nov;22(11):2481-7. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2849-7. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
9
Learning curve of full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy.全内窥镜下腰椎间盘切除术的学习曲线。
Eur Spine J. 2013 Apr;22(4):727-33. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2540-4. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
10
Transforaminal endoscopic spinal surgery: the future 'gold standard' for discectomy? - A review.经皮椎间孔内窥镜脊柱手术:椎间盘切除术的未来“金标准”?- 综述
Surgeon. 2012 Oct;10(5):290-6. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2012.05.001. Epub 2012 Jun 15.