• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术与保守治疗坐骨神经痛的比较:一项随机对照试验的 5 年结果。

Surgery versus prolonged conservative treatment for sciatica: 5-year results of a randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Academic Medical Center, Neurosurgical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2013 May 28;3(5):e002534. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002534.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002534
PMID:23793663
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3657649/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study describes the 5 years' results of the Sciatica trial focused on pain, disability, (un)satisfactory recovery and predictors for unsatisfactory recovery.

DESIGN

A randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Nine Dutch hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

Five years' follow-up data from 231 of 283 patients (82%) were collected.

INTERVENTION

Early surgery or an intended 6 months of conservative treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Scores from Roland disability questionnaire, visual analogue scale (VAS) for leg and back pain and a Likert self-rating scale of global perceived recovery were analysed.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between groups on the 5 years' primary outcome scores. Despite at least 6 months of conservative treatment 46% of the conservatively allocated patients were treated surgically because of severe leg pain and disability. Forty-nine (21%) patients had an unsatisfactory recovery at 5 years and the recovery pattern showed that there was a variable group of 66 patients (31%) with at least one unsatisfactory outcome at 1, 2 or 5 years of follow-up. Multivariate logistic regression showed that age (>40; OR 2.42 (95% CI 1.16 to 5.02)), severity of leg pain (VAS >70; OR 3.32 (95% CI 1.69 to 6.54)) and the Mc Gill affective score (score >3; OR 6.23 (95% CI 2.23 to 17.38)) were the only significant predictors for an unsatisfactory outcome at 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

In the long term, 8% of the patients with sciatica never showed any recovery and in at least 23%, sciatica appears to result in ongoing complaints, which fluctuate over time, irrespective of treatment. Prolonged conservative care might give patients a fair chance for pain and disability to resolve without surgery, but with the risk to receive delayed surgery after prolonged suffering of sciatica. Age above 40 years, severe leg pain at baseline and a higher affective Mc Gill pain score were predictors for unsatisfactory recovery. Trial Registry ISRCT No 26872154.

摘要

目的

本研究描述了坐骨神经痛试验的 5 年结果,重点关注疼痛、残疾、(不满意)康复以及对不满意康复的预测因素。

设计

一项随机对照试验。

设置

9 家荷兰医院。

参与者

共收集了 283 名患者中的 231 名(82%)的 5 年随访数据。

干预

早期手术或计划的 6 个月保守治疗。

主要观察指标

罗尔登残疾问卷评分、腿部和背部疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分以及整体感知恢复的李克特自我评分量表进行分析。

结果

两组在 5 年主要结局评分上无显著差异。尽管接受了至少 6 个月的保守治疗,但由于严重腿部疼痛和残疾,仍有 46%的保守治疗组患者接受了手术治疗。5 年后有 49 名(21%)患者康复不满意,且康复模式表明,有 66 名(31%)患者在 1、2 或 5 年随访中有至少 1 项不满意的结果,存在变异性。多变量逻辑回归显示,年龄(>40 岁;OR 2.42(95%CI 1.16 至 5.02))、腿部疼痛严重程度(VAS >70;OR 3.32(95%CI 1.69 至 6.54))和麦吉尔情感评分(评分>3;OR 6.23(95%CI 2.23 至 17.38))是 5 年时不满意结局的唯一显著预测因素。

结论

在长期随访中,8%的坐骨神经痛患者从未出现任何恢复,而在至少 23%的患者中,坐骨神经痛似乎导致持续的疼痛和残疾,这些症状随时间波动,与治疗无关。长期保守治疗可能使患者有机会在不进行手术的情况下缓解疼痛和残疾,但存在因长期坐骨神经痛而接受延迟手术的风险。年龄>40 岁、基线时腿部疼痛严重以及较高的麦吉尔情感疼痛评分是不满意康复的预测因素。试验注册号:ISRCTN26872154。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ba7/3657649/9f47e7183472/bmjopen2012002534f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ba7/3657649/01eb5b2d1c87/bmjopen2012002534f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ba7/3657649/9f47e7183472/bmjopen2012002534f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ba7/3657649/01eb5b2d1c87/bmjopen2012002534f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ba7/3657649/9f47e7183472/bmjopen2012002534f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Surgery versus prolonged conservative treatment for sciatica: 5-year results of a randomised controlled trial.手术与保守治疗坐骨神经痛的比较:一项随机对照试验的 5 年结果。
BMJ Open. 2013 May 28;3(5):e002534. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002534.
2
Prolonged conservative care versus early surgery in patients with sciatica caused by lumbar disc herniation: two year results of a randomised controlled trial.腰椎间盘突出症所致坐骨神经痛患者的长期保守治疗与早期手术:一项随机对照试验的两年结果
BMJ. 2008 Jun 14;336(7657):1355-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a143. Epub 2008 May 23.
3
Prognostic value of magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with sciatica.坐骨神经痛患者磁共振成像结果的预后价值
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Jun;24(6):978-85. doi: 10.3171/2015.10.SPINE15858. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
4
Tubular diskectomy vs conventional microdiskectomy for sciatica: a randomized controlled trial.管状椎间盘切除术与传统显微椎间盘切除术治疗坐骨神经痛的随机对照试验
JAMA. 2009 Jul 8;302(2):149-58. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.972.
5
Surgery versus prolonged conservative treatment for sciatica.坐骨神经痛的手术治疗与长期保守治疗对比
N Engl J Med. 2007 May 31;356(22):2245-56. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa064039.
6
Improving prediction of "inevitable" surgery during non-surgical treatment of sciatica.改善坐骨神经痛非手术治疗期间“不可避免”手术的预测。
Pain. 2008 Sep 15;138(3):571-576. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.02.011. Epub 2008 Mar 10.
7
Minimally important change values of a measurement instrument depend more on baseline values than on the type of intervention.测量工具的最小重要变化值更多地取决于基线值,而不是干预类型。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 May;68(5):518-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.07.008. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
8
Clinical outcome of instrumented fusion for the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome: a case series of 100 patients.经器械融合治疗失败性腰椎术后综合征的临床疗效:100 例病例系列研究。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012 Jul;154(7):1213-7. doi: 10.1007/s00701-012-1380-7. Epub 2012 May 16.
9
Surgery versus Conservative Care for Persistent Sciatica Lasting 4 to 12 Months.持续坐骨神经痛 4 至 12 个月的手术与保守治疗比较。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 19;382(12):1093-1102. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1912658.
10
Interventions for treating femoral shaft fractures in children and adolescents.儿童和青少年股骨干骨折的治疗干预措施。
Evid Based Child Health. 2014 Dec;9(4):753-826. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1987.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical Decision-Making Experience of Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Qualitative Study.腰椎间盘突出症患者的手术决策经验:一项定性研究。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Aug 22;19:2609-2621. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S539717. eCollection 2025.
2
Real-world treatment patterns and management gaps of lumbar disc herniation in the United States.美国腰椎间盘突出症的真实世界治疗模式与管理差距
N Am Spine Soc J. 2025 Jun 21;23:100757. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100757. eCollection 2025 Sep.
3
Spontaneous resorption of herniated lumbar discs: illustrative cases.

本文引用的文献

1
Magnetic resonance imaging in follow-up assessment of sciatica.磁共振成像在坐骨神经痛随访评估中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 14;368(11):999-1007. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209250.
2
Prognostic factors for non-success in patients with sciatica and disc herniation.坐骨神经痛和椎间盘突出症患者非手术治疗失败的预后因素。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Sep 22;13:183. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-183.
3
Duration of symptoms resulting from lumbar disc herniation: effect on treatment outcomes: analysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT).
腰椎间盘突出症的自然吸收:病例说明
J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2025 Jul 21;10(3). doi: 10.3171/CASE24873.
4
Comparative clinical efficacy of acupuncture combined with manipulation and other non-pharmacological interventions in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a prospective, multi-arm, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint trial.针灸联合推拿及其他非药物干预治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较临床疗效:一项前瞻性、多组、随机、开放标签、终点设盲试验。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 3;11:1507115. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1507115. eCollection 2024.
5
Evidence from Mendelian randomization analysis combined with meta-analysis for the causal validation of the relationship between 91 inflammatory factors and lumbar disc herniation.孟德尔随机化分析结合荟萃分析对91种炎症因子与腰椎间盘突出症之间关系进行因果验证的证据。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Nov 22;103(47):e40323. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040323.
6
Acupuncture for radicular pain: a review of analgesic mechanism.针刺治疗根性疼痛:镇痛机制综述
Front Mol Neurosci. 2024 Mar 26;17:1332876. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2024.1332876. eCollection 2024.
7
The long-term outcome of revision microdiscectomy for recurrent sciatica.复发性坐骨神经痛翻修显微椎间盘切除术的长期疗效。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Jun;33(6):2206-2212. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08199-5. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
8
The impact of novel inflammation-preserving treatment towards lumbar disc herniation resorption in symptomatic patients: a prospective, multi-imaging and clinical outcomes study.新型保留炎症治疗对有症状腰椎间盘突出症患者吸收的影响:一项前瞻性、多影像学和临床结局研究。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Mar;33(3):964-973. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-08064-x. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
9
Predictors of outcome in sciatica patients following an epidural steroid injection: the POiSE prospective observational cohort study protocol.经皮类固醇注射治疗坐骨神经痛患者结局的预测因素:POiSE 前瞻性观察队列研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 19;13(11):e077776. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077776.
10
Microdiscectomy Insurance Medical Necessity Criteria Are Inconsistent and Unnecessarily Restrictive.显微椎间盘切除术的保险医疗必要性标准不一致且限制过度。
Int J Spine Surg. 2024 Mar 4;18(1):1-8. doi: 10.14444/8521.
腰椎间盘突出症症状持续时间对治疗效果的影响:脊柱患者结局研究试验(SPORT)分析。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Oct 19;93(20):1906-14. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00878.
4
Prognostic factors in non-surgically treated sciatica: a systematic review.非手术治疗坐骨神经痛的预后因素:系统评价。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Sep 25;12:208. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-208.
5
Surgery versus conservative management of sciatica due to a lumbar herniated disc: a systematic review.腰椎间盘突出症所致坐骨神经痛的手术与保守治疗:系统评价。
Eur Spine J. 2011 Apr;20(4):513-22. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1603-7. Epub 2010 Oct 15.
6
Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: four-year results for the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT).腰椎间盘突出症的手术治疗与非手术治疗:脊柱患者预后研究试验(SPORT)的四年结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Dec 1;33(25):2789-800. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818ed8f4.
7
Prolonged conservative care versus early surgery in patients with sciatica caused by lumbar disc herniation: two year results of a randomised controlled trial.腰椎间盘突出症所致坐骨神经痛患者的长期保守治疗与早期手术:一项随机对照试验的两年结果
BMJ. 2008 Jun 14;336(7657):1355-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a143. Epub 2008 May 23.
8
Influence of gender and other prognostic factors on outcome of sciatica.性别及其他预后因素对坐骨神经痛预后的影响。
Pain. 2008 Aug 15;138(1):180-191. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.12.014. Epub 2008 Jan 31.
9
Surgery versus prolonged conservative treatment for sciatica.坐骨神经痛的手术治疗与长期保守治疗对比
N Engl J Med. 2007 May 31;356(22):2245-56. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa064039.
10
Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) observational cohort.腰椎间盘突出症的手术治疗与非手术治疗:脊柱患者预后研究试验(SPORT)观察性队列研究
JAMA. 2006 Nov 22;296(20):2451-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.20.2451.