Urbiztondo Inés, de Oliveira Sandi Michele, Hernández-Flores Nieves, Caballero Lidia, Suarez Miguel Angel, Bjerrum Lars, Cordoba Gloria
The Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, 1014 Copenhagen, Denmark.
The Institute for English, Germanic and Romance Studies, University of Copenhagen, 2300 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2018 Jul 5;7(3):57. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics7030057.
As part of the quality improvement program “Health Alliance for Prudent Prescribing, Yield And Use of anti-microbial Drugs In the Treatment of respiratory tract infections” (HAPPY AUDIT) South America, we planned to implement an intervention based on the use of quality indicators as a means to influence General Practitioners’ (GPs) prescribing decision. Knowledge on the acceptability and applicability of an intervention is crucial to decide whether the intervention is suitable and will achieve the expected outcomes. This study explores GPs’ views about the acceptability and applicability of using quality indicators as an intervention to influence their prescribing decision in patients with suspected Respiratory Tract Infections (RTIs) across four countries in South-America. In March 2015, GPs that were participating in HAPPY AUDIT South America were invited to participate in focus groups. A discussion guide covering the domains acceptability and applicability was used. Data was analyzed through systematic text condensation with an inductive approach. 171 GPs were invited and 48% participated. Acceptability ranged from totally acceptable to slightly acceptable. This spectrum of GPs views on acceptability was influenced by themes concerning applicability. In conclusion, there is a positive attitude towards the use of quality indicators. Nonetheless, applicability challenges have to be taken into consideration and solved if we are to achieve a large effect with the implementation of this intervention.
作为南美洲“谨慎使用抗菌药物治疗呼吸道感染的健康联盟:质量改进计划”(HAPPY AUDIT)的一部分,我们计划实施一项基于使用质量指标的干预措施,以此来影响全科医生(GPs)的处方决策。了解一项干预措施的可接受性和适用性对于确定该干预措施是否合适并能否实现预期结果至关重要。本研究探讨了南美洲四个国家的全科医生对于使用质量指标作为一种干预措施来影响他们对疑似呼吸道感染(RTIs)患者的处方决策的可接受性和适用性的看法。2015年3月,邀请了参与南美洲HAPPY AUDIT的全科医生参加焦点小组。使用了一份涵盖可接受性和适用性领域的讨论指南。通过采用归纳法的系统文本浓缩对数据进行了分析。共邀请了171名全科医生,48%的人参与。可接受性范围从完全可接受至略有可接受。全科医生在可接受性方面的这种观点范围受到有关适用性主题的影响。总之,对于使用质量指标存在积极态度。然而,如果我们要通过实施这项干预措施取得显著效果,就必须考虑并解决适用性方面的挑战。