Bruschi Angelo, Mazza Marianna, Camardese Giovanni, Calò Salvatore, Palumbo Claudia, Mandelli Laura, Callea Antonino, Gori Alessio, Di Nicola Marco, Marano Giuseppe, Berk Michael, di Sciascio Guido, Janiri Luigi
Institute of Psychiatry and Psychology, Department of Geriatrics, Neuroscience and Orthopedics, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Istituto di Psicopatologia, Rome, Italy.
Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 21;9:1047. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01047. eCollection 2018.
Aim of the study was the validation of the Bipolar Disorder Rating Scale (BDRS) in an Italian population. Secondary aim was the evaluation of differences between unipolar and bipolar depression and between bipolar I and II depressed patients. 125 Bipolar Disorder and 60 Major Depressive Disorder patients were administered an Italian translation of the BDRS (I-BDRS), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and Temperament and Character Inventory-Revised (TCI-R). I-BDRS showed considerable validity and reliability. Factor analysis found 3 subscales, two linked to depressive symptoms and one to mixed symptoms. Measures concerning depression (MADRS and HAM-D) were positively related to the I-BDRS's subscales, but mostly to the two subscales measuring depression. In mixed symptoms, the mean of the bipolar group was significantly higher than the unipolar group suggesting that the BDRS was able to distinguish between unipolar and bipolar depressed patients. I-BDRS is a valid scale for the measurement of depression in BD patients, with a notable internal consistency (Cronbach's α 0.82), a significant consistency between items/total (Cronbach's α from 0.80 to 0.82) and positive correlation with other scales (MADRS = 0.67, < 0.001; HDRS = 0.81, < 0.001; YMRS = 0.46 < 0.0001). The mixed state sub-scale shows usefulness in differentiating bipolar from unipolar patients. I-BDRS could be a sensitive tool, both in pure depression and in mixed states, and could be used in the everyday screening and treatment of Bipolar Disorder.
本研究的目的是在意大利人群中验证双相情感障碍评定量表(BDRS)。次要目的是评估单相抑郁与双相抑郁之间以及双相I型和II型抑郁患者之间的差异。对125名双相情感障碍患者和60名重度抑郁症患者进行了BDRS意大利语翻译版(I-BDRS)、汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HDRS)、蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)、杨氏躁狂评定量表(YMRS)以及修订版气质与性格问卷(TCI-R)的测试。I-BDRS显示出相当的有效性和可靠性。因子分析发现了3个分量表,其中两个与抑郁症状相关,一个与混合症状相关。关于抑郁的测量指标(MADRS和HAM-D)与I-BDRS的分量表呈正相关,但主要与测量抑郁的两个分量表相关。在混合症状方面,双相情感障碍组的平均分显著高于单相情感障碍组,这表明BDRS能够区分单相和双相抑郁患者。I-BDRS是测量双相情感障碍患者抑郁的有效量表,具有显著的内部一致性(克朗巴哈系数α为0.82),各条目与总分之间具有显著的一致性(克朗巴哈系数α从0.80到0.82),并且与其他量表呈正相关(MADRS = 0.67,P < 0.001;HDRS = 0.81,P < 0.001;YMRS = 0.46,P < 0.0001)。混合状态分量表在区分双相情感障碍和单相情感障碍患者方面显示出有效性。I-BDRS在单纯抑郁和混合状态下可能都是一个敏感的工具,可用于双相情感障碍的日常筛查和治疗。