Department of Intensive Care Unit, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Nanjing Bei Street 155, Shenyang, Liaoning Province 110001, China.
Department of Intensive Care Unit, Tacheng Hospital of China Medical University, Wenhua Road 22, Tacheng, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region 834700, China.
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Jun 7;2018:5086516. doi: 10.1155/2018/5086516. eCollection 2018.
In sepsis-3, in contrast with sepsis-1, the definition "systemic inflammatory response" has been replaced with "dysregulated host response", and "systemic inflammatory response syndrome" (SIRS) has been replaced with "sequential organ failure assessment" (SOFA). Although the definition of sepsis has changed, the debate regarding its nature is ongoing. What are the fundamental processes controlling sepsis-induced inflammation, immunosuppression, or organ failure? In this review, we discuss the heterogeneity of sepsis-3 and address the central role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of sepsis. An unbalanced pro- and anti-inflammatory response, inflammatory resolution disorder, and persistent inflammation play important roles in the acute and/or chronic phases of sepsis. Moreover, powerful links exist between inflammation and other host responses (such as the neuroendocrine response, coagulation, and immunosuppression). We suggest that a comprehensive evaluation of the role of the inflammatory response will improve our understanding of the heterogeneity of sepsis.
在 sepsis-3 中,与 sepsis-1 相反,“全身炎症反应”的定义已被“宿主反应失调”所取代,“全身炎症反应综合征”(SIRS)已被“序贯器官衰竭评估”(SOFA)所取代。尽管败血症的定义已经改变,但关于其性质的争论仍在继续。控制败血症引起的炎症、免疫抑制或器官衰竭的基本过程是什么?在这篇综述中,我们讨论了 sepsis-3 的异质性,并探讨了炎症在败血症发病机制中的核心作用。失衡的促炎和抗炎反应、炎症消退障碍和持续炎症在败血症的急性和/或慢性阶段发挥重要作用。此外,炎症与其他宿主反应(如神经内分泌反应、凝血和免疫抑制)之间存在着强大的联系。我们认为,对炎症反应作用的全面评估将提高我们对败血症异质性的认识。