• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

失败的可调节胃束带术的命运:所有患者都需要进一步进行减重手术吗?

Destiny of Failed Adjustable Gastric Bandings: Do All the Patients Need Further Bariatric Surgery?

机构信息

Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso A. M. Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2018 Nov;28(11):3380-3385. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3373-y.

DOI:10.1007/s11695-018-3373-y
PMID:29978440
Abstract

PURPOSE

The number of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) removal has increased throughout the years. The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcomes in patients undergoing LAGB removal with or without further bariatric surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data prospectively collected from consecutive patients undergoing LAGB removal from 2008 to 2016 at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. Obesity-related comorbidities, complications, and body mass index (BMI) before removal and at 1-year follow-up were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 156 patients were included in the study. Seventy-six patients had further surgery (SURG group): 55 underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and 21 laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). Eighty patients underwent only LAGB removal (No-SURG group). The mean BMI was lower in the No-SURG group (33.9 vs 36.3 kg/m, p = 0.0055). Reasons for removal were different in the two groups: dysphagia, frequent vomiting, and LAGB-related complications requiring urgent treatment occurred more commonly in the No-SURG group (p < 0.05): 71.3 vs 51.3%, 67.5% vs. 38.2%, 28.8% vs. 6.6%, respectively. At 1-year follow-up, 96.3% of No-SURG patients regained weight after LAGB removal; two (2.5%) patients showed new-onset comorbidities, four (5%) needed adjustments in pharmacological therapy, and four (5%) complained from persistence of GERD symptoms. Additional surgery provided significant weight loss: the mean %TWL was 23.7% after LSGs and 27.2% after LRYGBs.

CONCLUSIONS

LAGB is associated with a high rate of reoperation. Further bariatric surgery after LAGB removal should be considered due to weight regain, persistence of GERD symptoms, and new-onset comorbidities.

摘要

目的

腹腔镜可调节胃束带(LAGB)的移除数量逐年增加。本研究旨在评估在我院接受 LAGB 移除手术且是否进一步行减重手术的患者的结局。

材料和方法

本研究回顾性分析了 2008 年至 2016 年我院连续接受 LAGB 移除手术的患者的数据。评估了肥胖相关合并症、并发症以及移除前和 1 年随访时的体重指数(BMI)。

结果

共纳入 156 例患者。76 例患者进一步接受了手术(SURG 组):55 例行腹腔镜胃袖状切除术(LSG),21 例行腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(LRYGB)。80 例患者仅行 LAGB 移除(No-SURG 组)。No-SURG 组的平均 BMI 较低(33.9 比 36.3kg/m,p=0.0055)。两组患者移除的原因不同:吞咽困难、频繁呕吐和 LAGB 相关并发症需要紧急治疗在 No-SURG 组更常见(p<0.05):71.3%比 51.3%、67.5%比 38.2%、28.8%比 6.6%。在 1 年随访时,No-SURG 组 96.3%的患者在 LAGB 移除后体重恢复;2 例(2.5%)患者出现新发合并症,4 例(5%)需要调整药物治疗,4 例(5%)抱怨持续存在 GERD 症状。进一步的手术提供了显著的减重效果:LSG 术后平均体重减轻百分比(%TWL)为 23.7%,LRYGB 术后为 27.2%。

结论

LAGB 与较高的再手术率相关。由于体重反弹、GERD 症状持续存在和新发合并症,LAGB 移除后应考虑进一步行减重手术。

相似文献

1
Destiny of Failed Adjustable Gastric Bandings: Do All the Patients Need Further Bariatric Surgery?失败的可调节胃束带术的命运:所有患者都需要进一步进行减重手术吗?
Obes Surg. 2018 Nov;28(11):3380-3385. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3373-y.
2
Laparoscopic adjustable gastric band removal and outcome of subsequent revisional bariatric procedures: A retrospective review of 214 consecutive patients.腹腔镜可调节胃束带移除术及后续减重手术修正的结果:对214例连续患者的回顾性研究
Int J Surg. 2016 Mar;27:133-137. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.01.068. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
3
Gastric band conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass shows greater weight loss than conversion to sleeve gastrectomy: 5-year outcomes.胃束带转换为 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术比转换为袖状胃切除术能获得更大的减重效果:5 年随访结果。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Oct;14(10):1531-1536. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.06.002. Epub 2018 Jun 10.
4
Two-step conversion surgery after failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Comparison between laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic gastric sleeve.腹腔镜可调节胃束带术失败后的两步转换手术。腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术与腹腔镜胃袖状切除术的比较。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Nov-Dec;10(6):1085-91. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.03.017. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
5
Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding Revisions in Singapore: a 10-Year Experience.新加坡腹腔镜可调节胃束带术的翻修:十年经验
Obes Surg. 2016 May;26(5):1069-74. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1852-y.
6
What happens after gastric band removal without additional bariatric surgery?在不进行额外减肥手术的情况下,拆除胃束带后会发生什么?
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Nov-Dec;10(6):1092-6. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2013.10.014. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
7
Long-Term (over 10 Years) Retrospective Follow-up of Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding.腹腔镜可调节胃束带术的长期(超过10年)回顾性随访
Obes Surg. 2018 Apr;28(4):976-980. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2952-7.
8
Conversion of failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass?腹腔镜可调胃束带术失败后的转换:胃袖状切除术还是 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术?
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013 Nov-Dec;9(6):901-7. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2013.04.003. Epub 2013 Apr 17.
9
Long-term outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy as a revisional procedure after failed gastric band: a multicenter cross-matched cohort study.袖状胃切除术作为胃旁路术失败后的翻修术的长期疗效:一项多中心交叉匹配队列研究。
Updates Surg. 2022 Apr;74(2):709-713. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01182-5. Epub 2021 Oct 3.
10
Conversion of Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding to Gastric Bypass: a Comparison to Primary Gastric Bypass.腹腔镜可调节胃束带转胃旁路术:与初次胃旁路术的比较
Obes Surg. 2018 Jun;28(6):1519-1525. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-3047-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Revisional surgery after restrictive surgery: midterm outcomes of a tertiary center.限制型手术后的翻修手术:一家三级中心的中期结果。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Oct;37(10):7686-7697. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10274-9. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
2
Effect of Bariatric Surgery on Survival and Hospitalizations in Patients with Severe Obesity. A Retrospective Cohort Study.减重手术对重度肥胖患者生存和住院的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
Nutrients. 2021 Sep 9;13(9):3150. doi: 10.3390/nu13093150.

本文引用的文献

1
Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass versus Sleeve Gastrectomy as Revisional Procedure after Adjustable Gastric Band: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.可调节胃束带术后 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术作为修正手术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Obes Surg. 2017 May;27(5):1365-1373. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2644-3.
2
Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy as Revisional Procedures after Adjustable Gastric Band: 5-Year Outcomes.Roux-en-Y胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术作为可调节胃束带术后修正手术的5年结果
Obes Surg. 2017 Jun;27(6):1430-1437. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2502-8.
3
Laparoscopic adjustable gastric band removal and outcome of subsequent revisional bariatric procedures: A retrospective review of 214 consecutive patients.
腹腔镜可调节胃束带移除术及后续减重手术修正的结果:对214例连续患者的回顾性研究
Int J Surg. 2016 Mar;27:133-137. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.01.068. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
4
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for failed gastric banding: outcomes in 642 patients.腹腔镜下Roux-en-Y胃旁路术治疗胃束带术失败:642例患者的治疗结果
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 Feb;12(2):231-9. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.04.007. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
5
Systematic review of definitions of failure in revisional bariatric surgery.减重手术翻修中失败定义的系统评价
Obes Surg. 2015 Mar;25(3):571-4. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1541-2.
6
High failure rate of the laparoscopic-adjustable gastric band as a primary bariatric procedure.作为主要减肥手术的腹腔镜可调节胃束带术失败率高。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Nov-Dec;10(6):1070-5. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2013.11.014. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
7
What happens after gastric band removal without additional bariatric surgery?在不进行额外减肥手术的情况下,拆除胃束带后会发生什么?
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Nov-Dec;10(6):1092-6. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2013.10.014. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
8
Rebanding for slippage after gastric banding: should we do it?胃束带术后滑脱的再次束带:我们应该这样做吗?
Obes Surg. 2014 Apr;24(4):588-93. doi: 10.1007/s11695-013-1119-4.
9
Laparoscopic gastric bypass for failure of adjustable gastric banding: a review of 85 cases.腹腔镜胃旁路术治疗可调胃束带术失败:85 例回顾。
Obes Surg. 2011 Oct;21(10):1513-9. doi: 10.1007/s11695-011-0391-4.
10
Reasons and outcomes of laparoscopic revisional surgery after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity.腹腔镜可调节胃束带减肥术后腹腔镜再次手术的原因和结果。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010 Jul-Aug;6(4):391-8. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2009.12.010. Epub 2010 Jan 25.