• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

限制型手术后的翻修手术:一家三级中心的中期结果。

Revisional surgery after restrictive surgery: midterm outcomes of a tertiary center.

机构信息

Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Caen, Avenue de la Côte de Nacre, 14033, Caen Cedex, France.

Department of Anesthesia, University Hospital of Caen, Caen, France.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2023 Oct;37(10):7686-7697. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10274-9. Epub 2023 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-023-10274-9
PMID:37530989
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) is a challenging type of procedure for the surgeons due to its specific morbidity and efficiency. The RBS has a higher prevalence nowadays and this study may help to improve scarce data upon this specific topic.

METHODS

Data from 252 patients undergoing RBS after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) between 2005 and 2019, were analyzed at 2 years of follow up. A subgroup analysis of third procedure was also performed.

RESULTS

Overall morbidity occurred in 35 patients (37%) in the LSG group and 40 patients (25%) in the LAGB group (p = 0.045). At 2 years of RBS, mean weight was 92.8 ± 26.7 kg, BMI was 33.1 ± 8.56 kg/m for patients who had RBS after LSG. When RBS was performed after LAGB, mean weight at 2 years was 90.1 ± 20.7 kg and BMI was 32.5 ± 6.45 kg/m. TWL for RBS performed after LSG was 12.7 ± 16.4% versus 25.5 ± 10.3% after LAGB (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

RBS after LSG seems to lead to higher overall morbidity whereas RBS after LAGB lead to more perioperative issues.

摘要

简介

由于其特定的发病率和效率,减肥手术的再次手术(RBS)对外科医生来说是一种具有挑战性的手术类型。如今,RBS 的发病率更高,这项研究可能有助于改善这一特定主题的稀缺数据。

方法

在 2005 年至 2019 年期间,对 252 例接受腹腔镜可调胃带(LAGB)或腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)后行 RBS 的患者进行了数据分析,随访 2 年。还对第三次手术进行了亚组分析。

结果

在 LSG 组中,有 35 例(37%)患者发生总体并发症,在 LAGB 组中有 40 例(25%)患者发生总体并发症(p = 0.045)。在 RBS 后 2 年,LSG 后行 RBS 的患者平均体重为 92.8 ± 26.7kg,BMI 为 33.1 ± 8.56kg/m。当 LAGB 后行 RBS 时,2 年后的平均体重为 90.1 ± 20.7kg,BMI 为 32.5 ± 6.45kg/m。LSG 后行 RBS 的 TWL 为 12.7 ± 16.4%,而 LAGB 后行 RBS 的 TWL 为 25.5 ± 10.3%(p<0.001)。

结论

LSG 后行 RBS 似乎会导致更高的总体发病率,而 LAGB 后行 RBS 会导致更多的围手术期问题。

相似文献

1
Revisional surgery after restrictive surgery: midterm outcomes of a tertiary center.限制型手术后的翻修手术:一家三级中心的中期结果。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Oct;37(10):7686-7697. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10274-9. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
2
Surgery for weight loss in adults.成人减肥手术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 8;2014(8):CD003641. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003641.pub4.
3
Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy as Revisional Procedures after Adjustable Gastric Band: 5-Year Outcomes.Roux-en-Y胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术作为可调节胃束带术后修正手术的5年结果
Obes Surg. 2017 Jun;27(6):1430-1437. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2502-8.
4
Two-step conversion surgery after failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Comparison between laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic gastric sleeve.腹腔镜可调节胃束带术失败后的两步转换手术。腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术与腹腔镜胃袖状切除术的比较。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Nov-Dec;10(6):1085-91. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.03.017. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
5
Effectiveness and Safety of Sleeve Gastrectomy, Gastric Bypass, and Adjustable Gastric Banding in Morbidly Obese Patients: a Multicenter, Retrospective, Matched Cohort Study.袖状胃切除术、胃旁路手术和可调节胃束带术在病态肥胖患者中的有效性和安全性:一项多中心、回顾性、匹配队列研究。
Obes Surg. 2015 Jul;25(7):1110-8. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1503-8.
6
One anastomosis gastric bypass vs sleeve gastrectomy as a revisional bariatric surgery for weight loss failure after primary restrictive procedure.一种吻合口胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术作为初次限制手术减肥失败后的减重修复术。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2024 Jan;17(1):e13248. doi: 10.1111/ases.13248. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
7
Long-term outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy as a revisional procedure after failed gastric band: a multicenter cross-matched cohort study.袖状胃切除术作为胃旁路术失败后的翻修术的长期疗效:一项多中心交叉匹配队列研究。
Updates Surg. 2022 Apr;74(2):709-713. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01182-5. Epub 2021 Oct 3.
8
Revisional surgery after failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a systematic review.腹腔镜可调节胃束带术失败后的翻修手术:系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Mar;27(3):740-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2510-2. Epub 2012 Aug 31.
9
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a revisional procedure for failed gastric banding: lessons from 300 consecutive cases.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术作为胃束带术失败后的修正手术:来自300例连续病例的经验教训。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Nov-Dec;10(6):1116-22. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.02.045. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
10
Efficiency of Laparoscopic One-Step Revision of Failed Adjusted Gastric Banding to Gastric Sleeve: a Retrospective Review of 101 Consecutive Patients.腹腔镜下调整胃束带术失败后改为袖状胃切除术的效率:101 例连续患者的回顾性研究。
Obes Surg. 2019 Dec;29(12):3868-3873. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04061-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of the Lack of Follow-Up of Bariatric Surgery Patients: Experience of a Reference Center.肥胖症手术患者随访缺失情况分析:一家参考中心的经验
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 26;11(21):6310. doi: 10.3390/jcm11216310.
2
Impact of gastrointestinal symptoms and psychological disturbances on patients' quality of life after restrictive or malabsorptive bariatric surgery.胃肠道症状和心理障碍对限制性或吸收不良性减肥手术后患者生活质量的影响。
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Feb;46(2):92-101. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2022.02.007. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
3
Revisional Laparoscopic SADI-S vs. Duodenal Switch Following Failed Primary Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Single-Center Comparison of 101 Consecutive Cases.
腹腔镜下可调节胃束带术(SADI-S)与十二指肠转流术治疗初次袖状胃切除术后失败的对比:单中心 101 例连续病例比较。
Obes Surg. 2021 Aug;31(8):3667-3674. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05469-9. Epub 2021 May 12.
4
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Following Failed Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding-a Comparison Between One- and two-Stage Procedures, an Israeli National Database Study.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗腹腔镜可调节胃束带术失败:一项以色列国家数据库研究的单、双阶段手术比较。
Obes Surg. 2021 Jun;31(6):2364-2372. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05312-1. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
5
How Far Can Our Expectations Go on Revisional Bariatric Surgery After Failed Adjustable Gastric Banding?减重手术后可调整胃束带失败行再次手术的期望能有多高?
Obes Surg. 2021 Apr;31(4):1603-1611. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05167-y. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
6
Third bariatric procedure for insufficient weight loss or weight regain: how far should we go?第三次减重手术用于治疗减重效果不佳或体重反弹:我们应该走多远?
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2021 Jan;17(1):96-103. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.08.032. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
7
Bariatric revisional surgery: What are the challenges for the patient and the practitioner?减重手术的再次手术:患者和医生面临的挑战是什么?
J Visc Surg. 2021 Feb;158(1):38-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2020.08.014. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
8
Safety of Single Stage Revision Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Compared to Laparoscopic Roux-Y Gastric Bypass after Failed Gastric Banding.单阶段腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与腹腔镜 Roux-Y 胃旁路术治疗胃束带失败后的安全性比较。
Obes Surg. 2021 Feb;31(2):588-596. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04975-6. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
9
Comparison of sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass after failure of gastric banding: a two-center study with a propensity score-matched analysis.胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术治疗胃束带术失败的比较:一项采用倾向评分匹配分析的两中心研究。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jul;35(7):3513-3522. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07809-9. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
10
One Anastomosis/Mini Gastric Bypass (OAGB-MGB) as revisional bariatric surgery after failed primary adjustable gastric band (LAGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG): A systematic review of 1075 patients.一次吻合/迷你胃旁路术(OAGB-MGB)作为初次可调胃束带术(LAGB)和袖状胃切除术(SG)失败后的减肥手术:1075 例患者的系统回顾。
Int J Surg. 2020 Sep;81:32-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.07.007. Epub 2020 Jul 29.