Rourke Michelle F
Griffith Law School, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland.
Australian Defence Force Malaria and Infectious Disease Institute, Gallipoli Barracks, Enoggera, Queensland.
J Law Med. 2018 Feb;25(2):429-447.
Since the eradication of smallpox was declared in 1980, debate has ensued over what to do with the remaining stocks of the causative agent, variola virus. For more than three decades the World Health Organization has resolved to destroy the virus isolates, now maintained in high-security laboratories in the Russian Federation and the United States, and each time the deadline has been deferred. The legal facets of this debate have been largely overlooked. As genetic resources, all viruses fall within the scope of the United Nations' Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) that provides for the fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising out of the utilisation of genetic resources. This article examines the possible ownership scenarios for variola viruses and concludes that the conservation principles of the CBD and the ambiguous sovereign status of individual isolates may preclude the destruction of the world's remaining variola stocks.
自1980年宣布根除天花以来,关于如何处理天花致病源——天花病毒的剩余毒株,一直存在争论。三十多年来,世界卫生组织一直决心销毁目前保存在俄罗斯联邦和美国高安全实验室中的病毒分离株,但每次最后期限都被推迟。这场争论的法律层面在很大程度上被忽视了。作为遗传资源,所有病毒都属于联合国《生物多样性公约》(CBD)的范畴,该公约规定了公平公正地分享利用遗传资源所产生的惠益。本文探讨了天花病毒可能的所有权情况,并得出结论:《生物多样性公约》的保护原则以及单个分离株模糊的主权地位可能会阻止销毁世界上剩余的天花毒株。