• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主要抑郁症症状变化模式:长期病程的分类和聚类。

Patterns of symptom change in major depression: Classification and clustering of long term courses.

机构信息

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical University Hospital, Freiburg, Germany.

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2018 Sep;267:480-489. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.03.086. Epub 2018 Apr 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2018.03.086
PMID:29980128
Abstract

To evaluate treatment effects in depression, it is important to monitor change during treatment and also to follow up for a reasonably long time. Describing the variability of symptom change trajectories is useful to better predict long-term status and to improve interventions. Outcome data (N_ = 518, 4 time points, 1 year of observation time) from a large naturalistic multi-center study on the effects of inpatient and day hospital treatment of unipolar depression were used to identify clusters of symptom trajectories. Common outcome classifications and statistical methods of longitudinal cluster analysis were applied. However, common outcome classifications (in terms of e.g. remission, relapse or recurrence) were not exhaustive, as 49.3% of the trajectories could not be allocated to its classes. Longitudinal cluster analysis reveals 7 clusters (fast response, slow response, retarded response, temporary or persistent relapse, recurrence, and nonresponse). Nonresponse at the end of treatment was a predictor of poor outcome at long term follow up. The classification of patterns of symptom change in depression should be extended. Longitudinal cluster analysis seems a valid option to analyze outcome trajectories over time if a limited number of time points of measurement are available.

摘要

为了评估抑郁症的治疗效果,重要的是要在治疗过程中监测变化,并且还要进行合理的长期随访。描述症状变化轨迹的可变性有助于更好地预测长期状态,并改进干预措施。本研究使用了一项大型自然主义多中心研究的结果数据(N_=518,4 个时间点,1 年的观察时间),该研究评估了单相抑郁症住院和日间医院治疗效果。这些数据被用于识别症状轨迹的聚类。应用了常见的结局分类和纵向聚类分析的统计方法。然而,常见的结局分类(例如缓解、复发或重现)并不全面,因为 49.3%的轨迹无法归入其类别。纵向聚类分析揭示了 7 个聚类(快速反应、缓慢反应、延迟反应、暂时或持续复发、重现和无反应)。治疗结束时的无反应是长期随访中预后不良的预测因素。抑郁症症状变化模式的分类应该扩展。如果可测量的时间点数量有限,纵向聚类分析似乎是分析随时间变化的结局轨迹的有效选择。

相似文献

1
Patterns of symptom change in major depression: Classification and clustering of long term courses.主要抑郁症症状变化模式:长期病程的分类和聚类。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Sep;267:480-489. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.03.086. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
2
Prognostic and prescriptive predictors of improvement in a naturalistic study on inpatient and day hospital treatment of depression.一项关于抑郁症住院及日间医院治疗的自然主义研究中改善情况的预后和处方预测因素
J Affect Disord. 2016 Jun;197:205-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.03.039. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
3
Symptom change trajectories during inpatient psychotherapy in routine care and their associations with long-term outcomes.常规护理中住院心理治疗期间的症状变化轨迹及其与长期结果的关联。
Psychiatry Res. 2016 Apr 30;238:228-235. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.02.046. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
4
Does early improvement triggered by antidepressants predict response/remission? Analysis of data from a naturalistic study on a large sample of inpatients with major depression.抗抑郁药引发的早期改善能否预测疗效/缓解情况?对大量重度抑郁症住院患者的自然主义研究数据进行分析。
J Affect Disord. 2009 Jun;115(3):439-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.10.011. Epub 2008 Nov 22.
5
Typical disease courses of patients with unipolar depressive disorder after in-patient treatments-results of a cluster analysis of the INDDEP project.单相抑郁症患者住院治疗后的典型病程——INDDEP项目聚类分析结果
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Apr 6;14:1081474. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1081474. eCollection 2023.
6
Characteristics and differences in treatment outcome of inpatients with chronic vs. episodic major depressive disorders.慢性与发作性重度抑郁症患者住院治疗结局的特点和差异。
J Affect Disord. 2015 Mar 1;173:126-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.10.059. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
7
Longitudinal Clusters of Long-Term Trajectories in Patients with Early-Onset Chronic Depression: 2 Years of Naturalistic Follow-Up after Extensive Psychological Treatment.早发性慢性抑郁症患者长期轨迹的纵向聚类:广泛心理治疗后 2 年的自然随访。
Psychother Psychosom. 2024;93(1):65-74. doi: 10.1159/000535005. Epub 2023 Dec 28.
8
The course of depressive symptoms in unipolar depressive disorder during electroconvulsive therapy: a latent class analysis.单相抑郁障碍电抽搐治疗期间抑郁症状的病程:潜类别分析。
J Affect Disord. 2010 Jul;124(1-2):141-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.11.002. Epub 2009 Nov 20.
9
Novel Augmentation Strategies in Major Depression.重度抑郁症的新型强化治疗策略
Dan Med J. 2017 Apr;64(4).
10
Symptom course in inpatient and day clinic treatment of depression: Results from the INDDEP-Study.抑郁症住院和日间诊所治疗的症状进程:INDDEP 研究结果。
J Affect Disord. 2015 Nov 15;187:35-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.07.025. Epub 2015 Aug 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of psychosocial factors and biological pathways identified from rare-variant analysis with longitudinal trajectories of treatment response in major depressive disorder.心理社会因素与罕见变异分析确定的生物学途径与重度抑郁症治疗反应纵向轨迹的关联。
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 May 20;25(1):505. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06895-0.
2
Typical disease courses of patients with unipolar depressive disorder after in-patient treatments-results of a cluster analysis of the INDDEP project.单相抑郁症患者住院治疗后的典型病程——INDDEP项目聚类分析结果
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Apr 6;14:1081474. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1081474. eCollection 2023.
3
Methodological and Quality Flaws in the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Mental Health Research: Systematic Review.
心理健康研究中人工智能应用的方法学与质量缺陷:系统评价
JMIR Ment Health. 2023 Feb 2;10:e42045. doi: 10.2196/42045.
4
Temporal multi-step predictive modeling of remission in major depressive disorder using early stage treatment data; STAR*D based machine learning approach.基于 STAR*D 的机器学习方法,利用早期治疗数据对重度抑郁症缓解进行时间多步预测建模。
J Affect Disord. 2023 Mar 1;324:286-293. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.12.076. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
5
Predicting treatment outcome in depression: an introduction into current concepts and challenges.预测抑郁症的治疗效果:当前概念与挑战简介。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2023 Feb;273(1):113-127. doi: 10.1007/s00406-022-01418-4. Epub 2022 May 19.
6
Predicting Antidepressant Citalopram Treatment Response via Changes in Brain Functional Connectivity After Acute Intravenous Challenge.通过急性静脉注射激发后脑功能连接变化预测抗抑郁药西酞普兰的治疗反应
Front Comput Neurosci. 2020 Oct 6;14:554186. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2020.554186. eCollection 2020.
7
24-Month Outcomes of Primary Care Web-Based Depression Prevention Intervention in Adolescents: Randomized Clinical Trial.青少年基于初级保健的网络抑郁预防干预的 24 个月结果:随机临床试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 28;22(10):e16802. doi: 10.2196/16802.
8
Follow-Up Treatment After Inpatient Therapy of Patients With Unipolar Depression-Compliance With the Guidelines?单相抑郁症患者住院治疗后的后续治疗——是否符合指南?
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Aug 7;11:796. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00796. eCollection 2020.
9
Self-Criticism and Personality Functioning Predict Patterns of Symptom Change in Major Depressive Disorder.自我批评与人格功能可预测重度抑郁症的症状变化模式。
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 12;11:147. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00147. eCollection 2020.
10
Treatment response classes in major depressive disorder identified by model-based clustering and validated by clinical prediction models.基于模型聚类识别的重度抑郁症治疗反应类别,并通过临床预测模型验证。
Transl Psychiatry. 2019 Aug 5;9(1):187. doi: 10.1038/s41398-019-0524-4.