School of Psychological Science, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 6;8(1):10288. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28548-x.
Our ability to communicate effectively often relies on being able to shift our focus of attention to align with that of another person. This so-called "social attention" reflects the use of cues such as gaze, pointing and head orientation to infer the attentional focus of others. An important, but unresolved, question is whether these socially relevant cues automatically direct attention in observers, or whether cognitive resources shape this process. An additional issue is that existing work has almost exclusively examined eye gaze cues, thus potentially limiting the generalizability of this work across types of social cues. To examine these issues, the present research investigates the influence of limiting resource availability (using a concurrent memory load) on the ability of an oriented head cue to direct attention. The results indicate that reducing resource availability increases the impact of the head cue on attentional orienting - the opposite pattern to that obtained with gaze cues. This outcome suggests that resource availability does not affect all social cues the same, and that caution is warranted in drawing broad conclusions about mechanisms underlying social cueing of attention without appropriate comparisons across multiple types of social cues.
我们能否有效地进行沟通,往往取决于我们能否将注意力集中转移到与他人保持一致。这种所谓的“社会注意力”反映了我们使用注视、指点和头部朝向等线索来推断他人的注意力焦点。一个重要但尚未解决的问题是,这些与社交相关的线索是否会自动引导观察者的注意力,或者认知资源是否会影响这一过程。另一个问题是,现有研究几乎完全局限于考察目光注视线索,这可能限制了该工作在各种社交线索类型中的推广。为了研究这些问题,本研究考察了限制资源可用性(使用同时进行的记忆负荷)对定向头部线索引导注意力的能力的影响。结果表明,减少资源可用性会增加头部线索对注意力指向的影响——与目光线索得到的结果相反。这一结果表明,资源可用性不会以相同的方式影响所有社交线索,在没有对多种类型的社交线索进行适当比较的情况下,就社交线索引导注意力的机制得出广泛结论时需要谨慎。