Silfee Valerie J, Haughton Christina F, Jake-Schoffman Danielle E, Lopez-Cepero Andrea, May Christine N, Sreedhara Meera, Rosal Milagros C, Lemon Stephenie C
Division of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue North, Worcester 01655, MA, United States.
Department of Psychology, Springfield College, 263 Alden Street, Springfield 01109, MA, United States.
Prev Med Rep. 2018 May 10;11:74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.05.003. eCollection 2018 Sep.
Valid, reliable, and direct measures of physical activity (PA) are critical to assessing the impact of lifestyle PA interventions. However, little is known about the extent to which objective measures have been used to assess the outcomes of lifestyle PA interventions. This systematic review had two aims: 1) evaluate the extent to which PA is measured objectively in lifestyle PA interventions targeting adults and 2) explore and summarize what objective measures have been used and what PA dimensions and metrics have been reported. Pubmed, Cochrane Central Register, and PsychInfo were searched for lifestyle PA interventions conducted between 2006 and 2016. Of the 342 articles that met the inclusion criteria, 239 studies measured PA via subjective measures and 103 studies measured PA via objective measures. The proportion of studies using objective measures increased from 4.4% to 70.6% from 2006 to 2016. All studies measuring PA objectively utilized wearable devices; half (50.5%) used pedometers only and 40.8% used accelerometers only. A majority of the 103 studies reported steps (73.8%) as their PA metric. Incorporating objective measures of PA should continue to be a priority in PA research. More work is needed to address the challenges of comprehensive and consistent collecting, reporting, and analyzing of PA metrics.
有效的、可靠的和直接的身体活动(PA)测量方法对于评估生活方式PA干预措施的效果至关重要。然而,关于客观测量方法在评估生活方式PA干预措施结果中所使用的程度,人们知之甚少。本系统综述有两个目的:1)评估在针对成年人的生活方式PA干预措施中,PA被客观测量的程度;2)探索并总结使用了哪些客观测量方法,以及报告了哪些PA维度和指标。在Pubmed、Cochrane Central Register和PsychInfo中检索了2006年至2016年间进行的生活方式PA干预措施。在符合纳入标准的342篇文章中,239项研究通过主观测量方法测量PA,103项研究通过客观测量方法测量PA。从2006年到2016年,使用客观测量方法的研究比例从4.4%增加到70.6%。所有客观测量PA的研究都使用了可穿戴设备;一半(50.5%)仅使用计步器,40.8%仅使用加速度计。103项研究中的大多数(73.8%)将步数作为其PA指标。在PA研究中纳入PA的客观测量方法应继续作为优先事项。需要开展更多工作来应对PA指标全面且一致的收集、报告和分析方面的挑战。