Nazroo James, Zilanawala Afshin, Chen Meichu, Bécares Laia, Davis-Kean Pamela, Jackson James S, Kelly Yvonne, Panico Lidia, Sacker Amanda
Cathie Marsh Institute, University of Manchester, Humanities Bridgeford Street, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
University College London, London, UK.
SSM Popul Health. 2018 Jun 22;5:147-159. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.06.010. eCollection 2018 Aug.
Existing literature suggests that mixed race/ethnicity children are more likely to experience poor socioemotional wellbeing in both the US and the UK, although the evidence is stronger in the US. It is suggested that this inequality may be a consequence of struggles with identity formation, more limited connections with racial/ethnic/cultural heritage, and increased risk of exposure to racism. Using data from the UK Millennium Cohort Study (n = 13,734) and the US Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Birth Cohort (n ~ 6250), we examine differences in the socioemotional wellbeing of mixed and non-mixed 5/6 year old children in the UK and US and explore heterogeneity in outcomes across different mixed groups in both locations. We estimate a series of linear regressions to examine the contribution of factors that may explain any observed differences, including socio-economic and cultural factors, and examine the extent to which these processes vary across the two nations. We find no evidence of greater risk for poor socioemotional wellbeing for mixed race/ethnicity children in both national contexts. We find that mixed race/ethnicity children experience socio-economic advantage compared to their non-mixed minority counterparts and that socio-economic advantage is protective for socioemotional wellbeing. Cultural factors do not contribute to differences in socioemotional wellbeing across mixed and non-mixed groups. Our evidence suggests then that at age 5/6 there is no evidence of poorer socioemotional wellbeing for mixed race/ethnicity children in either the UK or the US. The contrast between our findings and some previous literature, which reports that mixed race/ethnicity children have poorer socioemotional wellbeing, may reflect changes in the meaning of mixed identities across periods and/or the developmental stage of the children we studied.
现有文献表明,在美国和英国,混血/多族裔儿童更有可能经历较差的社会情感幸福感,尽管在美国这一证据更为确凿。有人认为,这种不平等可能是身份认同形成过程中挣扎、与种族/族裔/文化遗产的联系更为有限以及遭受种族主义风险增加的结果。利用英国千禧队列研究(n = 13734)和美国儿童早期纵向研究——出生队列(n ≈ 6250)的数据,我们考察了英国和美国5/6岁混血与非混血儿童在社会情感幸福感方面的差异,并探讨了两个地区不同混血群体在结果上的异质性。我们估计了一系列线性回归,以检验可能解释任何观察到的差异的因素的作用,包括社会经济和文化因素,并考察这些过程在两个国家之间的差异程度。我们发现在这两个国家的背景下,没有证据表明混血/多族裔儿童有更大的社会情感幸福感较差的风险。我们发现,与非混血少数族裔儿童相比,混血/多族裔儿童具有社会经济优势,并且社会经济优势对社会情感幸福感具有保护作用。文化因素对混血与非混血群体在社会情感幸福感方面的差异没有影响。因此,我们的证据表明,在5/6岁时,没有证据表明英国或美国的混血/多族裔儿童的社会情感幸福感较差。我们的研究结果与之前一些文献的对比,那些文献报道混血/多族裔儿童的社会情感幸福感较差,可能反映了不同时期混血身份含义的变化和/或我们所研究儿童的发育阶段。