• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语义干扰的边界:优势性和词汇性在检索时起作用。

Boundaries of semantic distraction: dominance and lexicality act at retrieval.

作者信息

Marsh John E, Perham Nick, Sörqvist Patrik, Jones Dylan M

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Central Lancashire, Darwin Building, Preston, Lancashire, PR1 2HE, UK,

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2014 Nov;42(8):1285-301. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0438-6.

DOI:10.3758/s13421-014-0438-6
PMID:24993544
Abstract

Three experiments investigated memory for semantic information with the goal of determining boundary conditions for the manifestation of semantic auditory distraction. Irrelevant speech disrupted the free recall of semantic category- exemplars to an equal degree regardless of whether the speech coincided with presentation or test phases of the task (Experiment 1), and this occurred regardless of whether it comprised random words or coherent sentences (Experiment 2). The effects of background speech were greater when the irrelevant speech was semantically related to the to-be-remembered material, but only when the irrelevant words were high in output dominance (Experiment 3). The implications of these findings in relation to the processing of task material and the processing of background speech are discussed.

摘要

三项实验研究了语义信息的记忆,目的是确定语义听觉干扰表现的边界条件。无关言语对语义类别示例的自由回忆造成的干扰程度相同,无论该言语与任务的呈现阶段还是测试阶段重合(实验1),且无论其由随机单词还是连贯句子组成(实验2)。当无关言语与待记忆材料在语义上相关时,背景言语的影响更大,但仅当无关单词在产出优势方面较高时才会如此(实验3)。讨论了这些发现对于任务材料处理和背景言语处理的意义。

相似文献

1
Boundaries of semantic distraction: dominance and lexicality act at retrieval.语义干扰的边界:优势性和词汇性在检索时起作用。
Mem Cognit. 2014 Nov;42(8):1285-301. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0438-6.
2
A semantic mismatch effect on serial recall: Evidence for interlexical processing of irrelevant speech.系列回忆中的语义不匹配效应:无关言语的词汇间加工证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Mar;45(3):515-525. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000596. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
3
The importance of semantic similarity to the irrelevant speech effect.语义相似性对无关言语效应的重要性。
Mem Cognit. 1999 Jan;27(1):37-44. doi: 10.3758/bf03201211.
4
Interference by process, not content, determines semantic auditory distraction.过程而非内容的干扰决定了语义听觉分心。
Cognition. 2009 Jan;110(1):23-38. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.08.003. Epub 2008 Dec 10.
5
Auditory distraction eliminates retrieval induced forgetting: implications for the processing of unattended sound.听觉分心消除提取诱发遗忘:对未注意声音加工的启示。
Exp Psychol. 2013;60(5):368-75. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000210.
6
Effects of Auditory Distraction on Face Memory.听觉干扰对面部记忆的影响。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 15;9(1):10185. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46641-7.
7
Emotional prosody of task-irrelevant speech interferes with the retention of serial order.与任务无关的言语的情感韵律会干扰序列顺序的保持。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Aug;44(8):1303-1312. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000537. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
8
Cross-modal distraction by background speech: what role for meaning?背景语音的跨模态干扰:意义起什么作用?
Noise Health. 2010 Oct-Dec;12(49):210-6. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.70499.
9
Dynamic cognitive control of irrelevant sound: Increased task engagement attenuates semantic auditory distraction.无关声音的动态认知控制:任务参与度增加可减轻语义性听觉干扰。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Oct;41(5):1462-74. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000060. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
10
Retrieval of visual, auditory, and abstract semantics.
Neuroimage. 2002 Apr;15(4):917-26. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.1016.

引用本文的文献

1
Attenuated processing of task-irrelevant speech and other auditory stimuli: fMRI evidence from arithmetic tasks.对与任务无关的语音及其他听觉刺激的减弱处理:来自算术任务的功能磁共振成像证据。
Eur J Neurosci. 2024 Dec;60(12):7124-7147. doi: 10.1111/ejn.16616. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
2
Synergistic Effect Between Online Broadcast Media and Interactive Media on Purchase Intention.网络广播媒体与互动媒体对购买意愿的协同效应。
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 23;12:781743. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.781743. eCollection 2021.
3
Background Speech Effects on Sentence Processing during Reading: An Eye Movement Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Auditory distraction eliminates retrieval induced forgetting: implications for the processing of unattended sound.听觉分心消除提取诱发遗忘:对未注意声音加工的启示。
Exp Psychol. 2013;60(5):368-75. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000210.
2
Syntax does not necessarily precede semantics in sentence processing: ERP evidence from Chinese.在句子处理中,语法不一定先于语义:来自汉语的 ERP 证据。
Brain Lang. 2013 Jul;126(1):8-19. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.04.001. Epub 2013 May 3.
3
Auditory distraction compromises random generation. Falling back into old habits?
背景:阅读过程中语音对句子加工的影响:一项眼动研究。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 22;11(3):e0152133. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152133. eCollection 2016.
4
Failing to get the gist of what's being said: background noise impairs higher-order cognitive processing.无法理解所说内容的要点:背景噪音会损害高阶认知处理能力。
Front Psychol. 2015 May 21;6:548. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00548. eCollection 2015.
听觉干扰会影响随机生成。又回到旧习惯了吗?
Exp Psychol. 2013;60(4):279-92. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000198.
4
Habituation of the irrelevant sound effect: evidence for an attentional theory of short-term memory disruption.无关声音效果的习惯化:对短期记忆干扰的注意理论的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Nov;38(6):1542-57. doi: 10.1037/a0028459. Epub 2012 May 21.
5
Inhibitory control in memory: evidence for negative priming in free recall.记忆中的抑制控制:自由回忆中负启动的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Sep;38(5):1377-88. doi: 10.1037/a0027849. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
6
Investigating the role of attentional resources in the irrelevant speech effect.探究注意力资源在无关言语效应中的作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 May;140(1):64-74. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.02.009. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
7
Disruption of writing processes by the semanticity of background speech.背景言语的语义性对书写过程的干扰。
Scand J Psychol. 2012 Apr;53(2):97-102. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2011.00936.x. Epub 2012 Jan 27.
8
Retrieval from memory: vulnerable or inviolable?从记忆中检索:易受攻击还是不可侵犯?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Jul;38(4):905-22. doi: 10.1037/a0026781. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
9
Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Evidence for facilitatory and inhibitory processes.词汇记忆中的语义启动和提取:促进和抑制过程的证据。
Mem Cognit. 1976 Sep;4(5):648-54. doi: 10.3758/BF03213230.
10
Cross-modal distraction by background speech: what role for meaning?背景语音的跨模态干扰:意义起什么作用?
Noise Health. 2010 Oct-Dec;12(49):210-6. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.70499.