National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence in Frailty and Healthy Ageing, University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Canada.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2018 Jul 9;73(8):1090-1096. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glx185.
Frailty predicts mortality in residential aged care, but the relationship with hospitalization is inconsistent. The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare whether frailty is associated with hospitalization and mortality among residents of aged care services.
A prospective cohort study of 383 residents aged 65 years and older was conducted in six Australian residential aged care services. Frailty was assessed using the FRAIL-NH scale and a 66-item frailty index.
Overall, 125 residents were hospitalized on 192 occasions and 85 died over the 12-month follow-up. Over this period, less than 3% of the nonfrail/vulnerable residents but more than 20% of the most frail residents died at the facility without hospitalization. Using the FRAIL-NH, residents with mild/moderate frailty had higher numbers of hospitalizations (adjusted incidence rate ratio 1.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-2.20) and hospital days (incidence rate ratio 1.48, 95% CI 1.32-1.66) than nonfrail residents. Residents who were most frail had lower numbers of hospitalizations (incidence rate ratio 0.65, 95% CI 0.42-0.99) and hospital days (incidence rate ratio 0.39, 95% CI 0.33-0.46) than nonfrail residents. Similar patterns of associations with number of hospital days were observed for the frailty index. Most frail residents had a higher risk of death than nonfrail residents (for FRAIL-NH, adjusted hazard ratio 2.96, 95% CI 1.50-5.83; for frailty index, hazard ratio 5.28, 95% CI 2.05-13.59).
Residents with mild/moderate frailty had higher risk of hospitalization and death than nonfrail residents. Residents who were most frail had higher risk of death but lower risk of hospitalization than nonfrail residents.
衰弱预测了养老院中的死亡率,但与住院的关系并不一致。本研究的目的是调查和比较衰弱是否与养老院居民的住院和死亡率有关。
对澳大利亚六家养老院的 383 名 65 岁及以上的居民进行了前瞻性队列研究。使用 FRAIL-NH 量表和 66 项衰弱指数评估衰弱。
在整个 12 个月的随访期间,共有 125 名居民住院 192 次,85 人在院内死亡。在此期间,不到 3%的非衰弱/脆弱居民在没有住院的情况下在机构内死亡,而超过 20%的最衰弱居民在没有住院的情况下在机构内死亡。使用 FRAIL-NH,轻度/中度衰弱的居民住院次数更多(调整后的发病率比 1.57,95%置信区间 [CI] 1.11-2.20)和住院天数(发病率比 1.48,95% CI 1.32-1.66)高于非衰弱居民。最衰弱的居民住院次数更少(发病率比 0.65,95% CI 0.42-0.99)和住院天数(发病率比 0.39,95% CI 0.33-0.46)低于非衰弱居民。衰弱指数与住院天数的关联模式相似。最衰弱的居民死亡风险高于非衰弱居民(对于 FRAIL-NH,调整后的风险比 2.96,95% CI 1.50-5.83;对于衰弱指数,风险比 5.28,95% CI 2.05-13.59)。
轻度/中度衰弱的居民住院和死亡的风险高于非衰弱居民。最衰弱的居民死亡风险较高,但住院风险低于非衰弱居民。