Suppr超能文献

医疗抄写员对初级保健生产力、医患面对面时间和患者舒适度的影响。

Impact of Medical Scribes in Primary Care on Productivity, Face-to-Face Time, and Patient Comfort.

机构信息

From Institute for Community Health, Malden, MA (LZ, KF, MT); Cambridge Health Alliance, Cambridge (LZ, DR, AS); Harvard Medical School, Boston (LZ, DR, AS); Alpert Medical School Of Brown University, Providence, RI (RO)

From Institute for Community Health, Malden, MA (LZ, KF, MT); Cambridge Health Alliance, Cambridge (LZ, DR, AS); Harvard Medical School, Boston (LZ, DR, AS); Alpert Medical School Of Brown University, Providence, RI (RO).

出版信息

J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 Jul-Aug;31(4):612-619. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.04.170325.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medical scribes are a clinical innovation increasingly being used in primary care. The impact of scribes in primary care remain unclear. We aimed to examine the impact of medical scribes on productivity, time spent facing the patient during the visit, and patient comfort with scribes in primary care.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational pre-post study of 5 family and internal medicine-pediatrics physicians and their patients at an urban safety net health clinic. Medical scribes accompanied providers in the examination room and documented the clinical encounter. After an initial phase-in period, we added an additional 20-minute patient slot per 200-minute session. We examined productivity by using electronic medical record data on the number of patients seen and work relative value units (work RVUs) per hour. We directly observed clinical encounters to measure the amount of time providers spent facing patients and other visit components. We queried patient comfort with scribes by using surveys administered after the visit.

RESULTS

Work RVUs per hour increased by 10.5% from 2.59 prescribe to 2.86 post-scribe ( < .001). Patients seen per hour increased by 8.8% from 1.82 to 1.98 ( < .001). Work RVUs per patient did not change. After scribe implementation, time spent facing the patient increased by 57% ( < .001) and time spent facing the computer decreased by 27% ( = .003). The proportion of the visit time that was spent face-to-face increased by 39% ( < .001). Most (69%) patients reported feeling very comfortable with the scribe in the room, while the proportion feeling very comfortable with the number of people in the room decreased from 93% to 66% ( < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the full implications of medical scribe implementation remain to be seen, this initial study highlights the promising opportunity of medical scribe implementation in primary care.

摘要

背景

医学抄写员是一种在初级保健中越来越常用的临床创新。抄写员在初级保健中的影响尚不清楚。我们旨在研究医学抄写员对生产力、就诊期间与患者面对面的时间以及患者对抄写员的舒适度的影响。

方法

我们对一家城市医疗保障诊所的 5 名家庭医生和儿科医生及其患者进行了前瞻性观察性预-后研究。医学抄写员在检查室陪伴医生并记录临床就诊情况。在初始引入阶段之后,我们在每 200 分钟的就诊时段中增加了 20 分钟的患者时段。我们通过电子病历数据检查生产力,数据包括就诊患者数量和每小时工作相对价值单位(工作 RVU)。我们直接观察临床就诊情况,以衡量医生与患者和其他就诊环节面对面的时间。我们通过就诊后调查询问患者对抄写员的舒适度。

结果

每小时工作 RVU 从引入前的 2.59 prescribe 增加到引入后的 2.86( <.001)。每小时就诊患者数量从 1.82 增加到 1.98( <.001)。每位患者的工作 RVU 没有变化。引入抄写员后,与患者面对面的时间增加了 57%( <.001),与计算机面对面的时间减少了 27%( =.003)。面对面就诊时间的比例增加了 39%( <.001)。大多数(69%)患者表示非常喜欢房间里有抄写员,而非常喜欢房间里人数的比例从 93%下降到 66%( <.001)。

结论

尽管医学抄写员实施的全部影响仍有待观察,但这项初步研究强调了医学抄写员在初级保健中的应用具有广阔的前景。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验