Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Ann Fam Med. 2018 Jul;16(4):314-321. doi: 10.1370/afm.2265.
Fever is the most common reason for a child to be taken to a physician, yet the level of unwarranted antibiotic prescribing remains high. We aimed to determine the effect on antibiotic prescribing of providing an illness-focused interactive booklet on fever in children to out-of-hours primary care clinicians.
We conducted a cluster-randomized controlled trial in 20 out-of-hours general practice centers in the Netherlands. Children aged younger than 12 years with fever were included. Family physicians at the 10 intervention sites had access to an illness-focused interactive booklet between November 2015 and June 2016. The primary outcome was antibiotic prescribing during the index consultation. Analysis was performed by fitting 2-level random intercept logistic regression models.
The trial took place among 3,518 family physicians and 25,355 children. The booklet was used in 28.5% of 11,945 consultations in the intervention group. Compared with usual care, access to the booklet did not significantly alter antibiotic prescribing during the index consultation (odds ratio = 0.90; 95% CI, 0.79-1.02; prescription rate, 23.5% vs 25.2%; intracluster correlation coefficient = 0.005). In contrast, use of the booklet significantly reduced antibiotic prescribing (odds ratio = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.94; prescription rate, 21.9% vs 25.2%; intracluster correlation coefficient = 0.002). Children managed by family physicians with access to the booklet were less likely to receive any drug prescription, and parents in the booklet group showed a reduced intention to consult again for similar illnesses.
Benefit of an illness-focused interactive booklet in improving outcomes of childhood fever in out-of-hours primary care was largely restricted to the cases in which family physicians actually used the booklet. Insight into reasons for use and nonuse may inform future interventions of this type.
发热是儿童就诊最常见的原因,但不合理使用抗生素的情况仍然较为普遍。我们旨在确定为儿科夜间就诊的初级保健临床医生提供以疾病为重点的儿童发热互动手册对开抗生素处方的影响。
我们在荷兰 20 个夜间就诊的全科医疗中心进行了一项集群随机对照试验。纳入年龄小于 12 岁、发热的儿童。2015 年 11 月至 2016 年 6 月期间,10 个干预点的家庭医生可使用以疾病为重点的互动手册。主要结局为就诊时开抗生素处方。通过拟合 2 水平随机截距逻辑回归模型进行分析。
试验在 3518 名家庭医生和 25355 名儿童中进行。干预组中,11945 次就诊中有 28.5%使用了手册。与常规护理相比,使用手册并未显著改变就诊时开抗生素处方(比值比=0.90;95%CI,0.79-1.02;处方率 23.5%比 25.2%;组内相关系数=0.005)。相反,使用手册可显著减少抗生素处方(比值比=0.83;95%CI,0.74-0.94;处方率 21.9%比 25.2%;组内相关系数=0.002)。使用手册的家庭医生管理的儿童不太可能接受任何药物处方,且手册组的家长再次就诊治疗类似疾病的意愿降低。
在改善夜间儿科就诊中儿童发热的结局方面,以疾病为重点的互动手册的益处主要局限于家庭医生实际使用手册的病例。深入了解使用和不使用的原因可能会为今后此类干预措施提供信息。