Suppr超能文献

瑞典初级保健中与诊断相关的抗生素处方 - 工作时间内和工作时间外的比较。

Diagnosis-linked antibiotic prescribing in Swedish primary care - a comparison between in-hours and out-of-hours.

机构信息

Växjöhälsan Primary Healthcare Center, VC Växjöhälsan, Hjortvägen 1, 352 45, Växjö, Sweden.

Department of Research and Development, Region Kronoberg, Växjö, Sweden.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Aug 20;20(1):616. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05334-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The rise in antibiotic resistance is a global public health concern, and antibiotic overuse needs to be reduced. Earlier studies of out-of-hours care have indicated that antibiotic prescribing is less appropriate than that of in-hours care. However, no study has compared the out-of-hours treatment of infections to in-hours treatment within the same population.

METHODS

This retrospective, descriptive study was based on data retrieved from the Kronoberg Infection Database in Primary Care (KIDPC), which consists of all visits to primary care with an infection diagnosis or prescription of antibiotics during 2006-2014. The purpose was to study the trends in antibiotic prescribing and to compare consultations and prescriptions between in-hours and out-of-hours.

RESULTS

The visit rate for all infections was 434 visits per 1000 inhabitants per year. The visit rate was stable during the study period, but the antibiotic prescribing rate decreased from 266 prescriptions per 1000 inhabitants in 2006 to 194 prescriptions in 2014 (mean annual change - 8.5 [95% CI - 11.9 to - 5.2]). For the out-of-hours visits (12% of the total visits), a similar reduction in antibiotic prescribing was seen. The decrease was most apparent among children and in respiratory tract infections. When antibiotic prescribing during out-of-hours was compared to in-hours, the unadjusted relative risk of antibiotic prescribing was 1.37 (95% CI 1.36 to 1.38), but when adjusted for age, sex, and diagnosis, the relative risk of antibiotic prescribing was 1.09 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.10). The reduction after adjustment was largely explained by a higher visit rate during out-of-hours for infections requiring antibiotics (acute otitis media, pharyngotonsillitis, and lower urinary tract infection). The choices of antibiotics used for common diagnoses were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the infection visit rate was unchanged over the study period, there was a significant reduction in antibiotic prescribing, especially to children and for respiratory tract infections. The higher antibiotic prescribing rate during out-of-hours was small when adjusted for age, sex, and diagnosis. No excess prescription of broad-spectrum antibiotics was seen. Therefore, interventions selectively aiming at out-of-hours centres seem to be unmotivated in a low-prescribing context.

摘要

背景

抗生素耐药性的上升是一个全球公共卫生关注的问题,需要减少抗生素的过度使用。早期的非工作时间医疗研究表明,抗生素的开具不如工作时间的医疗开具合适。然而,尚无研究比较同一人群中非工作时间治疗感染与工作时间治疗感染。

方法

本回顾性描述性研究基于从初级保健中获得的 Kronoberg 感染数据库(KIDPC)的数据,该数据库包含 2006 年至 2014 年期间所有因感染诊断或开具抗生素处方而就诊的病例。目的是研究抗生素开具的趋势,并比较工作时间和非工作时间的就诊和处方情况。

结果

所有感染的就诊率为每千人每年 434 次。在研究期间,就诊率保持稳定,但抗生素开具率从 2006 年的每千人 266 例降至 2014 年的每千人 194 例(平均年变化率为-8.5[95%CI-11.9 至-5.2])。对于非工作时间就诊(占总就诊量的 12%),抗生素开具也出现了类似的减少。这种减少在儿童和呼吸道感染中最为明显。当比较非工作时间和工作时间的抗生素开具情况时,未调整的抗生素开具相对风险为 1.37(95%CI 1.36 至 1.38),但调整年龄、性别和诊断后,抗生素开具的相对风险为 1.09(95%CI 1.08 至 1.10)。调整后,抗生素开具减少的主要原因是需要抗生素的感染在非工作时间的就诊率较高(急性中耳炎、咽扁桃体炎和下尿路感染)。常见诊断的抗生素选择相似。

结论

尽管研究期间感染就诊率保持不变,但抗生素的开具量显著减少,尤其是儿童和呼吸道感染。调整年龄、性别和诊断后,非工作时间的抗生素开具率较高,但幅度较小。未发现广谱抗生素的过度处方。因此,在低处方背景下,有针对性地干预非工作时间中心似乎没有动机。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验