• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Perceptions of Primary Care Notes by Patients With Mental Health Diagnoses.患者对精神健康诊断相关的初级保健记录的看法。
Ann Fam Med. 2018 Jul;16(4):343-345. doi: 10.1370/afm.2287.
2
Online access to doctors' notes: patient concerns about privacy.在线获取医生记录:患者对隐私的担忧。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Sep 26;15(9):e208. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2670.
3
Patient Access to Online Visit Notes: Perceptions of Doctors and Patients at an Urban HIV/AIDS Clinic.患者获取在线就诊记录:城市艾滋病诊所中医生与患者的看法
J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2015 Jul-Aug;14(4):306-12. doi: 10.1177/2325957414526783. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
4
Inviting patients to read their doctors' notes: a quasi-experimental study and a look ahead.邀请患者阅读医生的记录:一项准实验研究及前瞻性观察。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Oct 2;157(7):461-70. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-7-201210020-00002.
5
Ophthalmology patients' interest in online access to clinic notes at three US clinics.美国三家诊所的眼科患者对在线获取病历的兴趣。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017 Jul;37(4):420-427. doi: 10.1111/opo.12367. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
6
A Web-Based Patient Portal for Mental Health Care: Benefits Evaluation.用于精神卫生保健的基于网络的患者门户:效益评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Nov 16;18(11):e294. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6483.
7
Patient Access to Mental Health Notes: Motivating Evidence-Informed Ethical Guidelines.患者获取心理健康记录:推动循证伦理准则。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2021 Apr 1;209(4):265-269. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000001303.
8
Impact of Open Access to Physician Notes on Radiation Oncology Patients: Results from an Exploratory Survey.开放医生笔记访问对放射肿瘤学患者的影响:探索性调查结果。
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2019 Mar;9(2):102-107. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
9
Trust in Mental Health Clinicians Among Patients Who Access Clinical Notes Online.在线获取临床记录的患者对心理健康临床医生的信任。
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 May 1;68(5):520-523. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600168. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
10
Do electronic health records affect the patient-psychiatrist relationship? A before & after study of psychiatric outpatients.电子健康记录是否会影响医患关系?一项针对精神科门诊患者的前后研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2010 Jan 8;10:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-10-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Records and Information Practices in Mental Health Care Contexts: Scoping Review.精神卫生保健背景下患者可访问的电子健康记录及信息实践:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 7;27:e54973. doi: 10.2196/54973.
2
Experiences from patients in mental healthcare accessing their electronic health records: results from a cross-national survey in Estonia, Finland, Norway, and Sweden.精神卫生保健患者获取电子健康记录的体验:来自爱沙尼亚、芬兰、挪威和瑞典的跨国调查结果。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 2;24(1):481. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05916-8.
3
Development of Recommendations for the Digital Sharing of Notes With Adolescents in Mental Health Care: Delphi Study.开发针对心理健康护理中与青少年共享笔记的数字建议:德尔菲研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Jun 6;11:e57965. doi: 10.2196/57965.
4
Reasons for Acceptance or Rejection of Online Record Access Among Patients Affected by a Severe Mental Illness: Mixed Methods Study.重度精神疾病患者接受或拒绝在线病历访问的原因:混合方法研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Feb 5;11:e51126. doi: 10.2196/51126.
5
Experiences of Patients With Mental Health Issues Having Web-Based Access to Their Records: National Patient Survey.心理健康问题患者通过网络访问其记录的体验:全国患者调查。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Feb 2;11:e48008. doi: 10.2196/48008.
6
Errors, Omissions, and Offenses in the Health Record of Mental Health Care Patients: Results from a Nationwide Survey in Sweden.精神卫生保健患者健康记录中的错误、遗漏和过失:来自瑞典全国性调查的结果。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 3;25:e47841. doi: 10.2196/47841.
7
Sharing Clinical Notes and Electronic Health Records With People Affected by Mental Health Conditions: Scoping Review.与受精神健康状况影响的人共享临床记录和电子健康记录:范围综述
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Dec 14;8(12):e34170. doi: 10.2196/34170.
8
The benefits and harms of open notes in mental health: A Delphi survey of international experts.心理健康领域中公开病历的利弊:国际专家德尔菲调查。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 13;16(10):e0258056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258056. eCollection 2021.
9
Patients, clinicians and open notes: information blocking as a case of epistemic injustice.患者、临床医生与开放病历:作为一种认知不公正情形的信息封锁
J Med Ethics. 2021 May 14;48(10):785-93. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107275.
10
Patient and Provider Experience of Electronic Patient Portals and Secure Messaging in Mental Health Treatment.患者和提供者对精神卫生治疗中电子患者门户和安全信息的体验。
Telemed J E Health. 2022 Feb;28(2):189-198. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0395. Epub 2021 Apr 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Trust in Mental Health Clinicians Among Patients Who Access Clinical Notes Online.在线获取临床记录的患者对心理健康临床医生的信任。
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 May 1;68(5):520-523. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600168. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
2
Inviting patients and care partners to read doctors' notes: OpenNotes and shared access to electronic medical records.邀请患者及其护理伙伴阅读医生记录:开放式病历与电子病历的共享访问。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;24(e1):e166-e172. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw108.
3
Your Patient Is Now Reading Your Note: Opportunities, Problems, and Prospects.你的患者正在阅读你的记录:机遇、问题与前景。
Am J Med. 2016 Oct;129(10):1018-21. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.05.015. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
4
When doctors share visit notes with patients: a study of patient and doctor perceptions of documentation errors, safety opportunities and the patient-doctor relationship.当医生与患者共享就诊记录时:一项关于患者和医生对文档错误、安全机会以及医患关系的看法的研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Apr;26(4):262-270. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004697. Epub 2016 May 18.
5
VA mental health clinician experiences and attitudes toward OpenNotes.美国退伍军人事务部心理健康临床医生对开放病历的体验和态度。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2016 Jan-Feb;38:89-93. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2015.08.001. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
6
A piece of my mind. Let's show patients their mental health records.我之见。让我们向患者展示他们的心理健康记录。
JAMA. 2014 Apr 2;311(13):1291-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.1824.
7
Inviting patients to read their doctors' notes: a quasi-experimental study and a look ahead.邀请患者阅读医生的记录:一项准实验研究及前瞻性观察。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Oct 2;157(7):461-70. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-7-201210020-00002.
8
Evaluating the impact of patients' online access to doctors' visit notes: designing and executing the OpenNotes project.评估患者在线获取医生就诊记录的影响:OpenNotes 项目的设计与执行。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Apr 13;12:32. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-32.
9
Understanding the expanding role of primary care physicians (PCPs) to primary psychiatric care physicians (PPCPs): enhancing the assessment and treatment of psychiatric conditions.理解初级保健医生(PCP)向初级精神科保健医生(PPCP)角色的扩展:加强精神疾病的评估与治疗。
Ment Health Fam Med. 2010 Mar;7(1):17-25.
10
Rates of detection of mood and anxiety disorders in primary care: a descriptive, cross-sectional study.基层医疗中情绪和焦虑障碍的检出率:一项描述性横断面研究。
Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2011;13(2). doi: 10.4088/PCC.10m01013.

患者对精神健康诊断相关的初级保健记录的看法。

Perceptions of Primary Care Notes by Patients With Mental Health Diagnoses.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Ann Fam Med. 2018 Jul;16(4):343-345. doi: 10.1370/afm.2287.

DOI:10.1370/afm.2287
PMID:29987083
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6037508/
Abstract

There are concerns regarding whether patients with mental illness should be provided with access to their electronic medical records. This study compared perceptions of patients with (n = 400) and without (n = 2,134) a mental health diagnosis regarding access to primary care clinic notes through secure online portals. Eligible participants viewed at least 1 clinic note during a 12-month period. Administrative data were used to stratify patients by mental health diagnosis. As we hypothesized, patients with and without mental health diagnoses had similar perceptions about online access to notes.

摘要

有人担心是否应该让患有精神疾病的患者获得他们的电子病历。本研究比较了有(n=400)和没有(n=2134)精神健康诊断的患者对通过安全在线门户获取初级保健诊所记录的看法。合格的参与者在 12 个月期间至少查看了 1 份诊所记录。使用管理数据按精神健康诊断对患者进行分层。正如我们假设的那样,有和没有精神健康诊断的患者对在线访问记录的看法相似。