Orr Katharine E, Andronikou Savvas, Bramham Marc James, Holjar-Erlic Izidora, Menegotto Flavia, Ramanan Athimalaipet V
Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, 24 Upper Maudlin Street, Bristol, BS2 8BJ, UK.
Peninsula Radiology Academy, Plymouth International Business Park, Plymouth, UK.
Pediatr Radiol. 2018 Oct;48(11):1621-1628. doi: 10.1007/s00247-018-4185-x. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
Clinicians increasingly rely on imaging in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) to identify sacroiliitis and guide treatment. However, there is limited evidence about magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for sacroiliitis in children, and interobserver reliability is variable.
Identify the frequency of MRI findings in children with suspected sacroiliitis, calculate inter-reporter reliability and assess the value of diffusion-weighted imaging and contrast-enhanced sequences.
We retrospectively reviewed 3 years of sacroiliac joint MRI records for suspected sacroiliitis in patients <21 years at a United Kingdom tertiary referral paediatric hospital. Five radiologists (panel of three radiologists and two independent radiologists) reviewed all MRI examinations using a pictorial checklist to identify oedema, effusions, diffusion-weighted signal abnormality, enhancement, erosions and sclerosis. The frequency of panel findings was reported. Interobserver agreement was calculated using the Cohen kappa coefficient.
An MRI diagnosis of sacroiliitis was made in 12 of 99 examinations (12%). The findings in all scans included oedema (9%), erosions (8%), diffusion-weighted signal abnormality (6%), abnormal enhancement (6%) and effusion (4%). All scans with abnormal contrast enhancement had other MRI features of sacroiliitis. Interobserver agreement was slight to moderate.
Oedema and erosions were the most common findings. Inter-reporter reliability was variable with at best moderate agreement for the presence of sacroiliitis and erosions. The use of contrast enhancement for diagnosing sacroiliitis in children with JIA may be questionable.
临床医生越来越依赖影像学检查来诊断幼年特发性关节炎(JIA)中的骶髂关节炎并指导治疗。然而,关于儿童骶髂关节炎的磁共振成像(MRI)证据有限,且观察者间的可靠性存在差异。
确定疑似骶髂关节炎患儿MRI表现的频率,计算报告者间的可靠性,并评估弥散加权成像和对比增强序列的价值。
我们回顾性分析了英国一家三级转诊儿科医院3年来年龄小于21岁疑似骶髂关节炎患者的骶髂关节MRI记录。五名放射科医生(由三名放射科医生和两名独立放射科医生组成的小组)使用图像检查表对所有MRI检查进行评估,以确定水肿、积液、弥散加权信号异常、强化、侵蚀和骨质硬化情况。报告小组评估结果的频率。使用Cohen卡方系数计算观察者间的一致性。
99例检查中有12例(12%)通过MRI诊断为骶髂关节炎。所有扫描结果包括水肿(9%)、侵蚀(8%)、弥散加权信号异常(6%)、异常强化(6%)和积液(4%)。所有对比增强异常的扫描均有其他骶髂关节炎的MRI特征。观察者间的一致性为轻度至中度。
水肿和侵蚀是最常见的表现。报告者间的可靠性存在差异,对于骶髂关节炎和侵蚀的存在,一致性充其量为中度。在JIA患儿中使用对比增强来诊断骶髂关节炎可能存在疑问。