a Kinesiology and Health Science Department, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA.
b Movement Research Clinic, Sorenson Legacy Foundation Center for Clinical Excellence, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA.
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2019 Feb;44(2):118-126. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2018-0333. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
Early adaptations in eccentric training show several advantages over those in concentric training. The purpose of this study was to quantify the effects of 4 weeks of multiple-joint eccentric versus traditional leg press (TLP) training on muscle strength, rate of torque development (RTD), and jump and sprint performance adaptations. Twenty-six resistance-trained adults performed either an eccentric or a TLP resistance-training program twice per week for 4 weeks. Single-joint isometric maximal and rapid strength (peak torque and RTD, respectively) and isokinetic strength of the knee extensors and flexors, multiple-joint eccentric strength, leg press strength (1-repetition maximum), 40-m sprint, and vertical and long jump were measured before, at the midpoint, and after a 4-week training period. Four weeks of isokinetic multiple-joint eccentric training elicited greater test-specific strength gains (effect size (ES) = 1.06) compared with TLP training (ES = 0.11). The eccentric group also yielded moderate improvements in the middle-late phase RTD (RTD100-200; ES = 0.51 and 0.54 for the knee flexors and extensors, respectively), whereas the TLP group showed small-moderate improvements (ES = 0.37). The majority of the single-joint strength variables showed negligible improvements. Performance tests showed no (broad jump) to small (vertical jump; sprint for the leg press) improvements. Multiple-joint eccentric training induced significant improvements in lower body strength in a short amount of time in a recreationally trained population. These accelerated adaptations along with the lower energy requirements of eccentric exercise, may be useful for clinicians or practitioners when prescribing training programs for those who are injured, sedentary, or elderly as a means to elicit time- and metabolically efficient muscle function improvements.
四周的多关节离心训练与传统腿举训练相比,在适应方面具有几个优势。本研究的目的是定量评估 4 周多关节离心与传统腿举训练对肌肉力量、扭矩发展速率(RTD)以及跳跃和短跑性能适应的影响。26 名有经验的成年人每周进行两次离心或传统腿举阻力训练,持续 4 周。在训练前、训练中期和 4 周训练后,测量了单关节等长最大和快速力量(分别为峰值扭矩和 RTD)、膝关节伸肌和屈肌的等速力量、多关节离心力量、腿举力量(1 次重复最大)、40m 短跑、垂直跳和跳远。与传统腿举训练(ES=0.11)相比,4 周的多关节等速离心训练引起了更大的特异性力量增长(效应大小(ES)=1.06)。离心组还使 RTD 的中晚期阶段(RTD100-200)适度提高(膝关节伸肌和屈肌分别为 ES=0.51 和 0.54),而传统腿举组显示出较小的适度提高(ES=0.37)。大多数单关节力量变量仅显示出微不足道的改善。性能测试显示,没有(跳远)到小(垂直跳;腿举短跑)的改善。多关节离心训练在短时间内使业余训练人群的下肢力量显著提高。这些加速适应以及离心运动较低的能量需求,对于临床医生或从业者来说可能是有用的,因为对于受伤、久坐或老年人来说,这是一种诱发时间和代谢效率高的肌肉功能改善的方法。