Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre for Cognition, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre for Cognition, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Aug;117:398-407. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.07.008. Epub 2018 Jul 7.
One of the main symptoms of Autism Spectrum Conditions (ASC) is experiencing cognitive inflexibility when adjustments of behaviour are required. While this so-called behavioural rigidity is broadly recognised in ASC, finding evidence for the underlying neurocognitive mechanisms remains challenging. In this electroencephalographic (EEG) study, participants with ASC and matched controls were instructed to choose between two cognitive tasks in each trial, and to respond to the subsequently presented target stimulus according to their task choice. While doing so, we tracked the frontally distributed contingent negative variation (CNV) during the task preparation interval as a measure of intentional control, and the posteriorly measured P3 during the task execution interval to monitor the translation of intentions into actions. The results support the notion of intentional control difficulties in ASC, where the CNV was attenuated in the ASC group compared to the control group. Furthermore, the CNV was differentiated between the tasks and transition types in the control group only, suggesting that the ASC group was less fine-tuning the required amount of intentional control to contextual circumstances. In contrast, the P3 showed no significant differences between the groups. Together, these findings highlight the importance of intentional control mechanisms as a crucial future route for a better understanding of cognitive flexibility and behavioural rigidity in ASC.
自闭症谱系障碍(ASC)的主要症状之一是在需要调整行为时表现出认知灵活性不足。虽然 ASC 中广泛认识到这种所谓的行为刚性,但寻找潜在的神经认知机制的证据仍然具有挑战性。在这项脑电图(EEG)研究中,ASC 患者和匹配的对照组被要求在每次试验中从两个认知任务中进行选择,并根据他们的任务选择对随后呈现的目标刺激做出反应。在执行任务的过程中,我们跟踪了任务准备间隔期间额部分布的条件性负变(CNV),作为意图控制的衡量标准,并在任务执行间隔期间测量后部的 P3,以监测意图向行动的转化。结果支持 ASC 中存在意图控制困难的观点,与对照组相比,ASC 组的 CNV 减弱。此外,CNV 仅在对照组中根据任务和过渡类型进行区分,这表明 ASC 组对情境环境的意图控制量调整不足。相比之下,P3 在组间没有显示出显著差异。综上所述,这些发现强调了意图控制机制的重要性,作为更好地理解 ASC 中的认知灵活性和行为刚性的关键未来途径。