Perez Marisol, Ohrt Tara K, Bruening Amanda B, Taylor Aaron B, Liew Jeffrey, Kroon Van Diest Ashley M W, Ungredda Tatianna
1Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, 950 S McAllister Avenue, Tempe, AZ 85287-1104 USA.
4Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4235 USA.
BMC Obes. 2018 Jun 11;5:17. doi: 10.1186/s40608-018-0192-6. eCollection 2018.
Although there have been extensive studies that make group comparisons on child eating and feeding practices, few studies have examined measurement equivalence to ensure that measures used to make such group comparisons are equivalent across important group characteristics related to childhood obesity.
Using a sample of 243 caregivers with children between the ages of 4 to 6 years, we conducted a measurement equivalence analysis across gender, ethnicity (Latino versus non-Latino White), and household food security. The subscales of the Child Feeding Questionnaire (CFQ) and the Child Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (CEBQ) were examined separately using a one factor multi-group confirmatory factor analysis.
For the CFQ, Concern about Child Weight and Parental Responsibility subscales were consistent across all groups examined. In contrast, Pressure to Eat, Restriction, and Perceived Parent Weight subscales varied or fit poorly across the groups. For the CEBQ, Emotional Overeating, Enjoyment of Food, and Satiety Responsiveness performed consistently across the groups. On the other hand, Food Fussiness, Desire to Drink, Slowness in Eating, and Emotional Undereating subscales varied or fit poorly across the groups.
Findings from this study suggest both of these measures need continued psychometric work, and group comparisons using some subscales should be interpreted cautiously. Some subscales such as Food Responsiveness and Parental Restriction may be assessing behaviors that occur in food secure households and are less applicable to food insecure environments.
尽管已有大量研究对儿童饮食和喂养习惯进行了组间比较,但很少有研究检验测量等效性,以确保用于进行此类组间比较的测量方法在与儿童肥胖相关的重要组特征之间具有等效性。
我们以243名有4至6岁孩子的照顾者为样本,对性别、种族(拉丁裔与非拉丁裔白人)和家庭粮食安全状况进行了测量等效性分析。使用单因素多组验证性因素分析分别检验了儿童喂养问卷(CFQ)和儿童饮食行为问卷(CEBQ)的子量表。
对于CFQ,在所有检验的组中,对儿童体重的关注和父母责任子量表是一致的。相比之下,进食压力、限制和感知到的父母体重子量表在各组之间存在差异或拟合不佳。对于CEBQ,情绪化暴饮暴食、对食物的享受和饱腹感反应在各组中表现一致。另一方面,食物挑剔、饮水欲望、进食缓慢和情绪化进食不足子量表在各组之间存在差异或拟合不佳。
本研究结果表明,这两种测量方法都需要持续进行心理测量学研究,并且使用某些子量表进行组间比较时应谨慎解释。一些子量表,如食物反应性和父母限制,可能评估的是粮食安全家庭中出现的行为,不太适用于粮食不安全的环境。