Kapogiannis Dimitrios, El Haj Mohamad
Laboratory of Neurosciences, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Laboratoire de Psychologie des Pays de la Loire (EA 4638), Université de Nantes, Nantes, France.
Curr Alzheimer Res. 2018;15(11):1070-1076. doi: 10.2174/1567205015666180711105242.
Research suggests beneficial effects of minimal interference on item memory in mild Alzheimer's disease (AD). We conducted a study to test whether these beneficial effects extend to source memory, i.e., the ability to remember the episodic context in which an information was previously acquired.
Twenty-six mild AD participants and 28 controls manipulated six objects or watched the experimenter manipulating six other objects. After immediate item recall ("what were the items?") and source recall ("by whom the items were previously manipulated?"), an interference or a minimal interference condition was administrated. In the interference condition, participants were assessed with neuropsychological tests for 10 min. In the minimal interference condition, they rested alone in a dark and quiet room for 10 minutes. Both interference and minimal interference conditions were followed by the delayed recall, on which participants were asked to remember the previously-presented objects and their source.
Higher item memory was observed following minimal interference than following interference in AD participants (p < .01) and controls (p < .01). Also, AD participants demonstrated higher item memory on immediate recall than following interference (p < .001) or minimal interference (p < .001); controls also demonstrated higher item memory on immediate recall than following interference (p < .001) or minimal interference (p < .001). Considering source memory, similar source memory was observed following interference and minimal interference in AD participants (p > .1) and controls (p > .1). Also, AD participants demonstrated higher source memory on immediate recall than following interference (p < .001) or minimal interference (p < .001); controls also demonstrated higher source memory on immediate recall than following interference (p < .001) or minimal interference (p < .001).
Failures of hippocampus-dependent associative or consolidation processes in AD may preclude benefits of minimal interference for source memory. Nevertheless, AD patients may show some capacity to retain simple material, should the material presentation be followed by short delays that are free of further stimuli.
研究表明,轻度阿尔茨海默病(AD)中最小干扰对项目记忆有有益影响。我们进行了一项研究,以测试这些有益影响是否也适用于源记忆,即记住先前获取信息时的情景背景的能力。
26名轻度AD参与者和28名对照组人员对六个物体进行操作,或观看实验者对另外六个物体进行操作。在即时项目回忆(“有哪些物品?”)和源回忆(“之前是谁操作的这些物品?”)之后,施加干扰或最小干扰条件。在干扰条件下,参与者接受10分钟的神经心理学测试。在最小干扰条件下,他们独自在黑暗安静的房间里休息10分钟。干扰和最小干扰条件之后均进行延迟回忆,要求参与者记住之前呈现的物体及其来源。
与干扰相比,AD参与者(p < .01)和对照组(p < .01)在最小干扰后观察到更高的项目记忆。此外,AD参与者在即时回忆时的项目记忆高于干扰后(p < .001)或最小干扰后(p < .001);对照组在即时回忆时的项目记忆也高于干扰后(p < .001)或最小干扰后(p < .001)。考虑源记忆,AD参与者(p > .1)和对照组(p > .1)在干扰和最小干扰后观察到相似的源记忆。此外,AD参与者在即时回忆时的源记忆高于干扰后(p < .001)或最小干扰后(p < .001);对照组在即时回忆时的源记忆也高于干扰后(p < .001)或最小干扰后(p < .001)。
AD中依赖海马体的联想或巩固过程的失败可能会排除最小干扰对源记忆的益处。然而,如果材料呈现后有短暂延迟且无进一步刺激,AD患者可能表现出保留简单材料的一定能力。