Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2024398. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.24398.
Reducing out-of-pocket costs is associated with improved patterns of contraception use. It is unknown whether reducing out-of-pocket costs is associated with fewer births.
To evaluate changes in birth rates by income level among commercially insured women before (2008-2013) and after (2014-2018) the elimination of cost sharing for contraception under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study used data from Clinformatics Data Mart database from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2018, for women aged 15 to 45 years who were enrolled in an employer-based health plan and had pregnancy benefits for at least 1 year. Women without household income information and women with evidence of having undergone a hysterectomy were excluded.
Section 2713 of the ACA.
The primary outcome was the proportion of reproductive-aged women with a live birth by year (measured yearly from 2008 to 2018 [11 time points]) within 3 income categories. The secondary outcome was the distribution of contraceptive method fills in 3 categories by year: (1) most effective methods (long-acting reversible contraception or sterilization), (2) moderately effective methods (pill, patch, ring, and injectable), and (3) no prescription or surgical method.
The analytic sample included 4 590 989 women (mean [SD] age; 30.8 [9.1] years in 2013; 3 069 053 White [66.9%]) enrolled in 47 721 health plans. A total of 500 898 participants (40.8%) resided in households with incomes less than 400% of the federal poverty level in 2013. In all 3 years (2008, 2013, and 2018), women in the lowest income category were younger than women in the other income groups (median range, 21-22 years vs 30-34 years) and in households with a higher median number of dependents (9-10 vs 2-4). There was an associated decrease in births in all income groups in the period after the elimination of out-of-pocket costs. The estimated probability of birth decreased most precipitously among women in the lowest income group from 8.0% (95% CI, 7.4%-8.5%) in 2014 to 6.2% (95% CI, 5.7%-6.7%) in 2018, representing a 22.2% decrease (P < .001). The estimated probability decreased in the middle income group by 9.4%, from 6.4% (95% CI, 6.3%-6.4%) to 5.8% (95% CI, 5.7%-5.8%) (P < .001), and in the highest income group by 1.8%, from 5.6% (95% CI, 5.6%-5.7%) to 5.5% (95% CI, 5.4%-5.5%) (P < .001) in the period after the elimination of cost sharing.
In this cross-sectional study, the elimination of cost sharing for contraception under the ACA was associated with improvements in contraceptive method prescription fills and a decrease in births among commercially insured women. Women with low income had more precipitous decreases than women with higher income, suggesting that enhanced access to contraception may address well-documented income-related disparities in unintended birth rates.
降低自付费用与改善避孕方法的使用模式有关。目前尚不清楚降低自付费用是否与出生人数减少有关。
评估在《患者保护与平价医疗法案》(ACA)取消避孕费用分担后,商业保险女性在收入水平方面的出生率变化。
设计、地点和参与者:本横断面研究使用了 Clinformatics Data Mart 数据库的数据,数据来自 2008 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日,纳入年龄在 15 至 45 岁之间、参加雇主健康计划且至少有 1 年妊娠福利的女性。排除无家庭收入信息和有子宫切除术证据的女性。
ACA 第 2713 条。
主要结果是在 3 个收入类别中,每年(2008 年至 2018 年,共 11 个时间点)有活产的育龄妇女的比例。次要结果是 3 个类别中每年避孕方法的使用情况分布:(1)最有效的方法(长效可逆避孕法或绝育);(2)中度有效的方法(药丸、贴片、环和注射剂);(3)无需处方或手术方法。
分析样本包括 4590989 名妇女(平均[标准差]年龄;2013 年为 30.8[9.1]岁;3069053 名白人[66.9%]),纳入 47721 个健康计划。共有 500898 名参与者(40.8%)居住在家庭收入低于联邦贫困水平 400%的家庭中。在所有 3 年(2008 年、2013 年和 2018 年)中,收入最低组的女性均比其他收入组的女性年轻(中位数范围,21-22 岁比 30-34 岁),且家庭中有更多的受抚养人(9-10 人比 2-4 人)。在取消自付费用后,所有收入群体的生育人数均有所下降。在收入最低的群体中,出生的估计概率下降最为明显,从 2014 年的 8.0%(95%CI,7.4%-8.5%)降至 2018 年的 6.2%(95%CI,5.7%-6.7%),下降了 22.2%(P<.001)。在中等收入组,出生的估计概率下降了 9.4%,从 6.4%(95%CI,6.3%-6.4%)降至 5.8%(95%CI,5.7%-5.8%)(P<.001),在最高收入组,出生的估计概率下降了 1.8%,从 5.6%(95%CI,5.6%-5.7%)降至 5.5%(95%CI,5.4%-5.5%)(P<.001)。在取消费用分担后。
在这项横断面研究中,ACA 取消避孕费用与商业保险女性避孕方法处方的改善和生育人数的减少有关。低收入女性的下降幅度大于高收入女性,这表明增加避孕措施的可及性可能有助于解决有充分记录的与收入相关的意外出生率差异。