Alrahlah Ali, Khan Rawaiz, Alotaibi Khalid, Almutawa Ziad, Fouad H, Elsharawy Mohamed, Silikas Nikolaos
Restorative Dental Sciences Department, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia.
Engineer Abdullah Bugshan research chair for Dental and Oral Rehabilitation, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia.
Materials (Basel). 2018 Jul 10;11(7):1180. doi: 10.3390/ma11071180.
The aim of this study is to compare the creep/recovery behavior of bulk-fill dental composites after storage in various food simulating organic solvents. For this purpose, five different resin-composites (four bulk-fills and one conventional) were used. A total of 20 rectangular specimens (14 mm × 3 mm × 0.7 mm) were prepared by filling the resin-composites in Teflon mold. All of the specimens for each material ( = 5) were divided into four groups namely dry (control), distilled water (DW), artificial saliva, and absolute ethanol. The specimens were subjected to three-point bending creep test during immersion directly. A constant load of 2 N was used for each specimen with loading and unloading time 2 h each.
SF2 and XF showed a lower creep strain % after immersion, ranging from 0.44 (dry) to 0.75 (saliva) and 0.43 (dry) to 0.80 (ethanol), respectively. TNC BF depicts the maximum creep strain % ranging from 1.24% (dry) to 2.87% (ethanol) followed by FBF ranging from 1.17 (dry) to 2.59 (ethanol). However, the conventional material (GR) showed lower creep strain after immersion ranging from 0.28 to 0.54. Moreover, SF2 resulted in the highest creep recovery in all of the composites groups, as well as conventional material. The other composite groups showed lower creep recovery as compared to the conventional material (GR). The creep strain % for all the bulk-fill composites materials were increased during immersion in the liquids. However, for the conventional material, the creep deformation is decreased after immersion. SF2 showed the highest percentage of creep recovery among the bulk-fill composites, followed by XF.
本研究的目的是比较大容量充填牙科复合材料在各种食品模拟有机溶剂中储存后的蠕变/恢复行为。为此,使用了五种不同的树脂复合材料(四种大容量充填材料和一种传统材料)。通过将树脂复合材料填充到聚四氟乙烯模具中制备了总共20个矩形试样(14毫米×3毫米×0.7毫米)。每种材料的所有试样(n = 5)分为四组,即干燥(对照)、蒸馏水(DW)、人工唾液和无水乙醇。试样在浸泡过程中直接进行三点弯曲蠕变试验。每个试样使用2 N的恒定载荷,加载和卸载时间均为2小时。
SF2和XF在浸泡后的蠕变应变百分比较低,分别为0.44(干燥)至0.75(唾液)和0.43(干燥)至0.80(乙醇)。TNC BF的蠕变应变百分比最高,为1.24%(干燥)至2.87%(乙醇),其次是FBF,为1.17(干燥)至2.59(乙醇)。然而,传统材料(GR)在浸泡后的蠕变应变较低,为0.28至0.54。此外,SF2在所有复合材料组以及传统材料中均具有最高的蠕变恢复率。与传统材料(GR)相比,其他复合材料组的蠕变恢复率较低。所有大容量充填复合材料材料在液体浸泡过程中的蠕变应变百分比均增加。然而,对于传统材料,浸泡后的蠕变变形减小。SF2在大容量充填复合材料中蠕变恢复率最高,其次是XF。