• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
It Ain't What You Do (But the Way That You Do It): Will Safety II Transform the Way We Do Patient Safety? Comment on "False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice".并非你做了什么（而是你做的方式）：安全 2 会改变我们进行患者安全的方式吗？述评“患者安全研究与实践中的虚假曙光和新视野”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Jul 1;7(7):659-661. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.14.
2
A Safety-II Perspective on Organisational Learning in Healthcare Organisations Comment on "False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice".从安全二视角看医疗组织中的组织学习——对“患者安全研究与实践中的虚假曙光和新视野”的评论。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Jul 1;7(7):662-666. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.16.
3
Safety I to Safety II: A Paradigm Shift or More Work as Imagined? Comment on "False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice".从安全性 I 到安全性 II：是观念的转变还是想象中的更多工作？评“患者安全研究与实践中的虚假曙光与新视野”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Jul 1;7(7):671-673. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.24.
4
Disturbing the Doxa of Patient Safety Comment on "False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice".扰乱患者安全的规范 评“患者安全研究与实践中的虚假曙光和新视野”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Sep 1;7(9):867-869. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.26.
5
The Rise of Patient Safety-II: Should We Give Up Hope on Safety-I and Extracting Value From Patient Safety Incidents? Comment on "False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice".患者安全的兴起-II：我们是否应该放弃安全-I 并从患者安全事件中提取价值？评论“患者安全研究和实践中的虚假曙光和新视野”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Jul 1;7(7):667-670. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.23.
6
False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice.虚假的曙光与患者安全研究和实践的新视野。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Dec 1;6(12):685-689. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.115.
7
Safety checklists: it ain't what you do, it's the way that you do it.
BMJ. 2023 Mar 8;380:550. doi: 10.1136/bmj.p550.
8
Changing what goes on in your head: how to stop "ain't it awful?".改变你头脑中的想法：如何停止“这难道不可怕吗？”的念头。
Physician Exec. 2001 May-Jun;27(3):68-71.
9
It ain't what you do but the way that you do it.关键不在你做什么，而在于你怎么做。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2001 Jan;6(1):3-5. doi: 10.1258/1355819011927125.
10
Safety-II and resilience: the way ahead in patient safety in anaesthesiology.安全-II与恢复力：麻醉学患者安全的未来之路
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2015 Dec;28(6):735-9. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000252.

引用本文的文献

1
Editorial: Psychosocial work environment during the COVID-19 pandemic.社论：新冠疫情期间的心理社会工作环境
Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 1;11:1272290. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1272290. eCollection 2023.
2
Videos of simulated after action reviews: a training resource to support social and inclusive learning from patient safety events.模拟行动后回顾视频：支持从患者安全事件中进行社会和包容性学习的培训资源。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Jul;12(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002270.
3
Patient safety for people experiencing advanced dementia in hospital: A video reflexive ethnography.医院中晚期痴呆患者的患者安全：视频反思民族志。
Dementia (London). 2023 Jul;22(5):1057-1076. doi: 10.1177/14713012231168958. Epub 2023 Apr 9.
4
Where is Patient Safety Research and Practice Heading? A Response to Recent Commentaries.患者安全研究与实践将何去何从？对近期评论的回应。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019 Feb 1;8(2):136-137. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.112.

本文引用的文献

1
Back to blame: the Bawa-Garba case and the patient safety agenda.责任回溯：巴瓦-加尔巴案与患者安全议程
BMJ. 2017 Nov 29;359:j5534. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j5534.
2
False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice.虚假的曙光与患者安全研究和实践的新视野。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Dec 1;6(12):685-689. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.115.
3
Nature of Blame in Patient Safety Incident Reports: Mixed Methods Analysis of a National Database.患者安全事件报告中的归咎性质：对国家数据库的混合方法分析
Ann Fam Med. 2017 Sep;15(5):455-461. doi: 10.1370/afm.2123.
4
Can patient involvement improve patient safety? A cluster randomised control trial of the Patient Reporting and Action for a Safe Environment (PRASE) intervention.患者参与能否提高患者安全性？患者报告与安全环境行动（PRASE）干预的整群随机对照试验。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Aug;26(8):622-631. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005570. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
5
Implementing resilience engineering for healthcare quality improvement using the CARE model: a feasibility study protocol.使用CARE模型实施弹性工程以改善医疗质量：一项可行性研究方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016 Oct 12;2:61. doi: 10.1186/s40814-016-0103-x. eCollection 2016.
6
Patient safety and the problem of many hands.患者安全与“人多手杂”问题
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Jul;25(7):485-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005232. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
7
Safety measurement and monitoring in healthcare: a framework to guide clinical teams and healthcare organisations in maintaining safety.医疗保健中的安全测量与监测：指导临床团队和医疗保健机构维护安全的框架。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Aug;23(8):670-7. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002757. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
8
The demonstration of a theory-based approach to the design of localized patient safety interventions.基于理论的方法在本地化患者安全干预设计中的应用演示。
Implement Sci. 2013 Oct 16;8:123. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-123.
9
Development of an evidence-based framework of factors contributing to patient safety incidents in hospital settings: a systematic review.基于证据的医院环境中导致患者安全事件因素框架的制定：系统评价。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 May;21(5):369-80. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000443. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
10
Feedback from incident reporting: information and action to improve patient safety.事件报告的反馈：用于提高患者安全的信息与行动
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Feb;18(1):11-21. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.024166.

并非你做了什么（而是你做的方式）：安全 2 会改变我们进行患者安全的方式吗？述评“患者安全研究与实践中的虚假曙光和新视野”。

It Ain't What You Do (But the Way That You Do It): Will Safety II Transform the Way We Do Patient Safety? Comment on "False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice".

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.

出版信息

Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Jul 1;7(7):659-661. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.14.

DOI:10.15171/ijhpm.2018.14
PMID:29996586
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6037503/
Abstract

Mannion and Braithwaite outline a new paradigm for studying and improving patient safety - Safety II. In this response, I argue that Safety I should not be dismissed simply because the safety management strategies that are developed and enacted in the name of Safety I are not always true to the original philosophy of 'systems thinking.'

摘要

曼尼恩和布雷思韦特为研究和改善患者安全勾勒出一个新的范例——安全 II。在本回应中，我认为不应仅仅因为以安全 I 名义制定和实施的安全管理策略并不总是符合“系统思维”的初衷哲学，就摒弃安全 I。