Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Jul 1;7(7):662-666. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.16.
In their recent editorial Mannion and Braithwaite provide an insightful critique of traditional patient safety improvement efforts, and offer a powerful alternative vision based on Safety-II thinking that has the potential to radically transform the way we approach patient safety. In this commentary, I explore how the Safety-II perspective points to new directions for organisational learning in healthcare organisations. Current approaches to organisational learning adopted by healthcare organisations have had limited success in improving patient safety. I argue that these approaches learn about the wrong things, and in the wrong way. I conclude that organisational learning in healthcare organisations should provide deeper understanding of the adaptations healthcare workers make in their everyday clinical work, and that learning and improvement approaches should be more democratic by promoting participation and ownership among a broader range of stakeholders as well as patients.
曼尼恩和布雷思韦特最近在社论中对传统的患者安全改进工作进行了深刻的批评,并提出了基于安全 II 思维的强有力的替代愿景,有可能从根本上改变我们处理患者安全的方式。在这篇评论中,我探讨了安全 II 视角如何为医疗保健组织的组织学习指明新的方向。目前医疗保健组织采用的组织学习方法在提高患者安全性方面收效甚微。我认为这些方法学习的内容和方式都不对。我得出结论,医疗保健组织的组织学习应该更深入地了解医疗工作者在日常临床工作中所做的调整,并且学习和改进方法应该更加民主,通过促进更广泛的利益相关者(包括患者)的参与和所有权来实现。