• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Safety-II Perspective on Organisational Learning in Healthcare Organisations Comment on "False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice".从安全二视角看医疗组织中的组织学习——对“患者安全研究与实践中的虚假曙光和新视野”的评论。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Jul 1;7(7):662-666. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.16.
2
It Ain't What You Do (But the Way That You Do It): Will Safety II Transform the Way We Do Patient Safety? Comment on "False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice".并非你做了什么(而是你做的方式):安全 2 会改变我们进行患者安全的方式吗?述评“患者安全研究与实践中的虚假曙光和新视野”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Jul 1;7(7):659-661. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.14.
3
Safety I to Safety II: A Paradigm Shift or More Work as Imagined? Comment on "False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice".从安全性 I 到安全性 II:是观念的转变还是想象中的更多工作?评“患者安全研究与实践中的虚假曙光与新视野”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Jul 1;7(7):671-673. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.24.
4
Disturbing the Doxa of Patient Safety Comment on "False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice".扰乱患者安全的规范 评“患者安全研究与实践中的虚假曙光和新视野”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Sep 1;7(9):867-869. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.26.
5
The Rise of Patient Safety-II: Should We Give Up Hope on Safety-I and Extracting Value From Patient Safety Incidents? Comment on "False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice".患者安全的兴起-II:我们是否应该放弃安全-I 并从患者安全事件中提取价值?评论“患者安全研究和实践中的虚假曙光和新视野”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Jul 1;7(7):667-670. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.23.
6
The RELATE model: strategies to effectively engage healthcare organisations to create amenable contexts for implementation.RELATE 模型:有效吸引医疗机构参与,为实施创造有利环境的策略。
J Health Organ Manag. 2021 Jun 24;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print):338-48. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-08-2020-0335.
7
Rethinking capacity building for knowledge mobilisation: developing multilevel capabilities in healthcare organisations.重新思考知识转化的能力建设:培养医疗保健组织中的多层次能力。
Implement Sci. 2014 Nov 15;9:166. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0166-0.
8
False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice.虚假的曙光与患者安全研究和实践的新视野。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Dec 1;6(12):685-689. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.115.
9
[Anaesthetists learn--do institutions also learn? Importance of institutional learning and corporate culture in clinics].[麻醉医生学习——医疗机构也学习吗?临床机构学习和企业文化的重要性]
Anaesthesist. 2007 Oct;56(10):983-91. doi: 10.1007/s00101-007-1265-y.
10
Organisational reporting and learning systems: Innovating inside and outside of the box.组织报告与学习系统:突破常规内外创新。
Clin Risk. 2015 Jan;21(1):7-12. doi: 10.1177/1356262215574203.

引用本文的文献

1
How to become partners. Ways to enhance the quality of patient and public involvement in healthcare research.如何成为合作伙伴。提高患者和公众参与医疗保健研究质量的方法。
Qual Res Med Healthc. 2025 Jun 25;9(2):100016. doi: 10.1016/j.qrmh.2025.100016. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
A retrospective records review comparing the care of patients who either avoided or were admitted to an ICU following a ward-based deterioration event.一项回顾性病历审查,比较了在病房病情恶化事件后避免入住或被收治入重症监护病房(ICU)的患者的护理情况。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2025 Oct;90:104064. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2025.104064. Epub 2025 Jun 12.
3
Interprofessional Learning and Improving at the Paediatric Ward: A Participatory Action Research Practising Safety-II Theory.儿科病房的跨专业学习与改进:一项践行安全-II理论的参与式行动研究
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Mar;31(2):e70061. doi: 10.1111/jep.70061.
4
The impact of a clinical academic nurse researcher in critical care: A 1-year service review.临床学术护理研究者在重症监护中的影响:为期一年的服务回顾。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Apr;81(4):1806-1814. doi: 10.1111/jan.16367. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
5
Improving escalation of deteriorating patients through cognitive task analysis: Understanding differences between work-as-prescribed and work-as-done.通过认知任务分析提高病情恶化患者的救治水平:了解工作规定与实际执行之间的差异。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 Mar;151:104671. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104671. Epub 2023 Dec 10.
6
The process and perspective of serious incident investigations in adult community mental health services: integrative review and synthesis.成人社区心理健康服务中严重事件调查的过程与视角:综合综述与分析
BJPsych Bull. 2024 Jan 4;49(1):1-13. doi: 10.1192/bjb.2023.98.
7
Editorial: Psychosocial work environment during the COVID-19 pandemic.社论:新冠疫情期间的心理社会工作环境
Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 1;11:1272290. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1272290. eCollection 2023.
8
Learning from experience: a qualitative study of surgeons' perspectives on reporting and dealing with serious adverse events.从经验中学习:一项定性研究,探讨外科医生对报告和处理严重不良事件的看法。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Jun;12(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002368.
9
Healthcare professionals' longitudinal perceptions of group phenomena as determinants of self-assessed learning in organizational communities of practice.医疗保健专业人员对群体现象的纵向认知是自我评估组织实践共同体学习的决定因素。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Feb 3;22(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03137-9.
10
NHS 'Learning from Deaths' reports: a qualitative and quantitative document analysis of the first year of a countrywide patient safety programme.NHS《死亡学习》报告:全国患者安全计划实施第一年的定性和定量文献分析
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 7;11(7):e046619. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046619.

本文引用的文献

1
False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice.虚假的曙光与患者安全研究和实践的新视野。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Dec 1;6(12):685-689. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.115.
2
Emergency Department Escalation in Theory and Practice: A Mixed-Methods Study Using a Model of Organizational Resilience.急诊室升级的理论与实践:一项运用组织韧性模型的混合方法研究
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Nov;70(5):659-671. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.04.032. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
3
Our current approach to root cause analysis: is it contributing to our failure to improve patient safety?我们当前的根本原因分析方法:它是否导致了我们在改善患者安全方面的失败?
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 May;26(5):381-387. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005991. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
4
The problem with root cause analysis.根本原因分析的问题。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 May;26(5):417-422. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005511. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
5
Learning from excellence in healthcare: a new approach to incident reporting.从卓越医疗中学习:事件报告的新方法。
Arch Dis Child. 2016 Sep;101(9):788-91. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-310021. Epub 2016 May 4.
6
The problem with incident reporting.事件报告的问题。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Feb;25(2):71-5. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004732. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
7
Where the rubber meets the road: using FRAM to align work-as-imagined with work-as-done when implementing clinical guidelines.理论与实践的结合:在实施临床指南时运用FRAM将设想中的工作与实际完成的工作相匹配。
Implement Sci. 2015 Aug 29;10:125. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0317-y.
8
What are incident reports telling us? A comparative study at two Australian hospitals of medication errors identified at audit, detected by staff and reported to an incident system.事件报告告诉了我们什么?对澳大利亚两家医院进行的一项比较研究,该研究涉及在审计中发现、由工作人员检测到并报告给事件系统的用药错误。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2015 Feb;27(1):1-9. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu098. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
9
Managing competing organizational priorities in clinical handover across organizational boundaries.在跨组织边界的临床交接中管理相互竞争的组织优先事项。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2015 Jan;20(1 Suppl):17-25. doi: 10.1177/1355819614560449.
10
Changes in adverse event rates in hospitals over time: a longitudinal retrospective patient record review study.随着时间的推移,医院不良事件发生率的变化:一项纵向回顾性患者病历回顾研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Apr;22(4):290-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001126. Epub 2013 Jan 4.

从安全二视角看医疗组织中的组织学习——对“患者安全研究与实践中的虚假曙光和新视野”的评论。

A Safety-II Perspective on Organisational Learning in Healthcare Organisations Comment on "False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice".

机构信息

Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

出版信息

Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Jul 1;7(7):662-666. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.16.

DOI:10.15171/ijhpm.2018.16
PMID:29996587
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6037496/
Abstract

In their recent editorial Mannion and Braithwaite provide an insightful critique of traditional patient safety improvement efforts, and offer a powerful alternative vision based on Safety-II thinking that has the potential to radically transform the way we approach patient safety. In this commentary, I explore how the Safety-II perspective points to new directions for organisational learning in healthcare organisations. Current approaches to organisational learning adopted by healthcare organisations have had limited success in improving patient safety. I argue that these approaches learn about the wrong things, and in the wrong way. I conclude that organisational learning in healthcare organisations should provide deeper understanding of the adaptations healthcare workers make in their everyday clinical work, and that learning and improvement approaches should be more democratic by promoting participation and ownership among a broader range of stakeholders as well as patients.

摘要

曼尼恩和布雷思韦特最近在社论中对传统的患者安全改进工作进行了深刻的批评,并提出了基于安全 II 思维的强有力的替代愿景,有可能从根本上改变我们处理患者安全的方式。在这篇评论中,我探讨了安全 II 视角如何为医疗保健组织的组织学习指明新的方向。目前医疗保健组织采用的组织学习方法在提高患者安全性方面收效甚微。我认为这些方法学习的内容和方式都不对。我得出结论,医疗保健组织的组织学习应该更深入地了解医疗工作者在日常临床工作中所做的调整,并且学习和改进方法应该更加民主,通过促进更广泛的利益相关者(包括患者)的参与和所有权来实现。