Suppr超能文献

比较16S rDNA扩增子测序和杂交捕获法用于豌豆蚜微生物群多样性分析

Comparing 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing and hybridization capture for pea aphid microbiota diversity analysis.

作者信息

Cariou Marie, Ribière Céline, Morlière Stéphanie, Gauthier Jean-Pierre, Simon Jean-Christophe, Peyret Pierre, Charlat Sylvain

机构信息

Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, CNRS, UMR 5558, Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, 43 Boulevard du 11 novembre 1918, 69622, Villeurbanne, France.

Department of Biology, University of Namur, Rue de Bruxelles 61, 5000, Namur, Belgium.

出版信息

BMC Res Notes. 2018 Jul 11;11(1):461. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3559-3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Targeted sequencing of 16S rDNA amplicons is routinely used for microbial community profiling but this method suffers several limitations such as bias affinity of universal primers and short read size. Gene capture by hybridization represents a promising alternative. Here we used a metagenomic extract from the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum to compare the performances of two widely used PCR primer pairs with DNA capture, based on solution hybrid selection.

RESULTS

All methods produced an exhaustive description of the 8 bacterial taxa known to be present in this sample. In addition, the methods yielded similar quantitative results, with the number of reads strongly correlating with quantitative PCR controls. Both methods can thus be considered as qualitatively and quantitatively robust on such a sample with low microbial complexity.

摘要

目的

16S rDNA扩增子的靶向测序常用于微生物群落分析,但该方法存在一些局限性,如通用引物的偏倚亲和力和短读长。杂交基因捕获是一种很有前景的替代方法。在这里,我们使用豌豆蚜(Acyrthosiphon pisum)的宏基因组提取物,基于溶液杂交选择,比较两种广泛使用的PCR引物对与DNA捕获的性能。

结果

所有方法都对该样本中已知存在的8个细菌类群进行了详尽的描述。此外,这些方法产生了相似的定量结果,读数数量与定量PCR对照密切相关。因此,在这种微生物复杂性较低的样本上,这两种方法在定性和定量方面都可被认为是可靠的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec7e/6042230/34079d9e2da0/13104_2018_3559_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验