Ashikari Andrew Y, Kelemen Pond R, Tastan Bahar, Salzberg C Andrew, Ashikari Roy H
Ashikari Breast Center, St. John's Riverside Health System, Yonkers, NY, USA.
NYP/Hudson Valley Hospital, Cortlandt Manor, NY, USA.
Gland Surg. 2018 Jun;7(3):273-287. doi: 10.21037/gs.2017.09.02.
Nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM) has quickly become an accepted technique for patients with selected cancers and for risk reducing surgery. Much of its surgical acceptance over the last decade has been based on the low risk of nipple areolar complex (NAC) occurrence in breast cancer patients. Improved patient satisfaction due to improved cosmetic outcomes with reconstruction have also driven its popularity. We reviewed current English journals to determine the NSM techniques which achieve the lowest complications, best outcomes, and best patient satisfaction. We researched studies showing reductions in complications with improved surgical techniques and patient selection which have been implicated in improved results. In the studies reviewed, incision placement, away from the nipple, resulted in the lowest rates of ischemic nipple complications and the best cosmetic outcomes. The effect of other factors such as surgeon experience and thickness of skin flap development were more difficult to prove. Leaving a 2-3 mm rim of tissue around the nipple bundle was shown to help preserve the nipple vascularity. Lower complication rates with improved outcomes and patient satisfaction were reported in the literature in patients with B or smaller cup sizes, non-smokers, and patients with lower body mass index (BMI). Incision placement, away from the nipple, with preservation of a 2-3 mm rim of tissue around the nipple bundle along with careful patient selection were the most significant variables reviewed which helped to lower complications rates of NSM. Coordinated surgical planning with the breast and plastic surgeons to determine the best surgical approach for each individual patient is necessary to obtain the best results. Although short-term oncologic follow-up seems to be acceptable, longer follow-up will still be needed to define the best breast cancer surgical candidates for the nipple sparing approach.
保乳手术(NSM)已迅速成为特定癌症患者和降低风险手术的一种被认可的技术。在过去十年中,其在手术方面被广泛接受很大程度上是基于乳腺癌患者乳头乳晕复合体(NAC)受累风险较低。由于重建后的美容效果改善,患者满意度提高,这也推动了其普及。我们查阅了当前的英文期刊,以确定能实现最低并发症、最佳效果和最佳患者满意度的保乳手术技术。我们研究了一些研究,这些研究表明通过改进手术技术和患者选择可降低并发症,而这与改善结果有关。在所查阅的研究中,远离乳头的切口位置导致缺血性乳头并发症发生率最低且美容效果最佳。其他因素,如外科医生经验和皮瓣厚度等的影响则更难证明。在乳头束周围保留2 - 3毫米的组织边缘有助于保留乳头血管。文献报道,杯罩尺寸为B或更小、不吸烟以及体重指数(BMI)较低的患者并发症发生率较低,效果和患者满意度更好。远离乳头的切口位置、在乳头束周围保留2 - 3毫米的组织边缘以及仔细的患者选择是所查阅的最显著变量,有助于降低保乳手术的并发症发生率。与乳腺外科医生和整形外科医生进行协调的手术规划,以确定针对每个患者的最佳手术方法,对于获得最佳结果是必要的。虽然短期肿瘤学随访似乎是可以接受的,但仍需要更长时间的随访来确定适合保乳手术方法的最佳乳腺癌手术候选者。