Yu Jie, Han Zhi-Yu, Li Ting, Feng Wen-Zhe, Yu Xiao-Ling, Luo Yan-Chun, Wu Han, Jiang Jian, Wang Jian-Dong, Liang Ping
Department of Interventional Ultrasound, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Department of Ultrasound, People's Hospital of Sanya, Sanya, China.
Front Oncol. 2020 Oct 7;10:546883. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.546883. eCollection 2020.
Compared with nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM), microwave ablation (MWA) is one relatively new modality indicated for selected breast cancer with nipple sparing and with little of evidence-based medical research for decision-making. The objective of this study was to compare the effect of ultrasound-guided percutaneous MWA and NSM for breast cancer.
A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a single institution from 2014 to 2020. Women with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast ≤ 5cm treated by MWA or NSM were enrolled. The primary end point was tumor progression and secondary end points included survival, cosmetic results, and complications.
21 patients in the MWA group and 43 in the NSM group were evaluated. The mean tumor size was 2.3 cm (range, 0.3-5.0 cm). Median follow-up was 26.7 months (range, 14.6-62.5 months). The mean age of MWA was 24 years older than that of the NSM group. All the patients achieved technique effectiveness. One local tumor progression and one ipsilateral breast recurrence occurred at 42 and 28 months after MWA, respectively. One ipsilateral breast recurrence and two bone metastasis occurred at 31.2, 34, and 30.5 months after NSM. Two groups had no significant difference in tumor progression (P = 0.16). No participants in both groups developed cancer related death (P > 0.99) and major complications (P > 0.99). However, MWA needed less hospitalization time (P < 0.001) and achieved better cosmetic results (P < 0.001).
MWA achieved similar short term effect for breast cancer control and better cosmetic satisfaction compared with NSM in selected patients. MWA provides appropriate option for elderly patients who are unfit for surgery.
与保留乳头的乳房切除术(NSM)相比,微波消融(MWA)是一种相对较新的治疗方式,适用于特定的保留乳头的乳腺癌患者,且缺乏基于证据的医学研究用于决策。本研究的目的是比较超声引导下经皮微波消融术与保留乳头的乳房切除术治疗乳腺癌的效果。
2014年至2020年在单一机构进行了一项回顾性队列研究。纳入接受微波消融术或保留乳头的乳房切除术治疗的乳腺浸润性导管癌≤5cm的女性患者。主要终点是肿瘤进展,次要终点包括生存率、美容效果和并发症。
对微波消融术组的21例患者和保留乳头的乳房切除术组的43例患者进行了评估。平均肿瘤大小为2.3cm(范围0.3 - 5.0cm)。中位随访时间为26.7个月(范围14.6 - 62.5个月)。微波消融术组的平均年龄比保留乳头的乳房切除术组大24岁。所有患者均实现了技术有效性。微波消融术后分别在42个月和28个月发生1例局部肿瘤进展和1例同侧乳房复发。保留乳头的乳房切除术后分别在31.2个月、34个月和30.5个月发生1例同侧乳房复发和2例骨转移。两组在肿瘤进展方面无显著差异(P = 0.16)。两组均无患者发生癌症相关死亡(P > 0.99)和严重并发症(P > 0.99)。然而,微波消融术所需住院时间更短(P < 0.001),美容效果更好(P < 0.001)。
在选定的患者中,与保留乳头的乳房切除术相比,微波消融术在控制乳腺癌方面取得了相似的短期效果,且美容满意度更高。微波消融术为不适合手术的老年患者提供了合适的选择。