• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症患者医院焦虑抑郁量表评估

Assessment of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale for cancer patients.

作者信息

Villoria Erica, Lara Laura

机构信息

Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Santiago, Chile.

出版信息

Rev Med Chil. 2018 Mar;146(3):300-307. doi: 10.4067/s0034-98872018000300300.

DOI:10.4067/s0034-98872018000300300
PMID:29999099
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Depression and anxiety are common in patients with cancer.

AIM

To adapt and validate the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) for adult Chilean cancer patients, and to provide information about their prevalence of anxiety and depression.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two hundred fifteen patients with cancer answered an adapted version of HADS for Chilean population. The language adjustment of the scale was carried out with the opinions of 10 expert linguists and with a pilot study on 17 cancer patients. The Depression and Anxiety subscales of the DASS-21 were also applied to verify the convergent validity of HADS: Results: The confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the data fits the model of two correlated factors (anxiety and depression), χ2 = 98.608; df = 76;p < 0.05; χ2/df= 1.23, RMSEA = 0.037; CFI = 0.99; TLI = .98. Reliability analysis showed an adequate internal consistency of both subscales (.76 for anxiety and .84 for depression) and the general scale (.87). Correlations between HADS and DASS-21 scores were significant for both anxiety (r =.514, p < 0.001) and depression (r = 0.600, p < 0.001). Prevalence rates were approximately 30% for depression (actual = 12%, possible = 22.8%) and approximately 20% for anxiety (actual = 7%, possible = 8.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that HADS is a reliable and valid instrument for screening clinically relevant anxiety and depression symptoms in Chilean cancer patients.

摘要

背景

抑郁症和焦虑症在癌症患者中很常见。

目的

对医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)进行改编并验证其适用于智利成年癌症患者,并提供有关其焦虑和抑郁患病率的信息。

材料与方法

215名癌症患者回答了针对智利人群改编版的HADS。量表的语言调整是在10位专家语言学家的意见以及对17名癌症患者的预试验基础上进行的。还应用了抑郁焦虑量表(DASS-21)的抑郁和焦虑分量表来验证HADS的收敛效度。结果:验证性因素分析表明数据符合两个相关因素(焦虑和抑郁)的模型,χ2 = 98.608;df = 76;p < 0.05;χ2/df = 1.23,RMSEA = 0.037;CFI = 0.99;TLI = 0.98。信度分析显示两个分量表(焦虑分量表为0.76,抑郁分量表为0.84)以及总量表(0.87)都具有足够的内部一致性。HADS与DASS-21得分之间的焦虑相关性(r = 0.514,p < 0.001)和抑郁相关性(r = 0.600,p < 0.001)均显著。抑郁症患病率约为30%(实际为12%,可能为22.8%),焦虑症患病率约为20%(实际为7%,可能为8.4%)。

结论

我们得出结论,HADS是一种可靠且有效的工具,可用于筛查智利癌症患者临床上相关的焦虑和抑郁症状。

相似文献

1
Assessment of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale for cancer patients.癌症患者医院焦虑抑郁量表评估
Rev Med Chil. 2018 Mar;146(3):300-307. doi: 10.4067/s0034-98872018000300300.
2
The Basic Documentation for Psycho-Oncology Short Form (PO-Bado SF)--an expert rating scale for distress screening: development and psychometric properties.心理肿瘤学简表基本文档(PO-Bado SF)——一种用于痛苦筛查的专家评定量表:编制及心理测量学特性
Psychooncology. 2015 Jun;24(6):653-60. doi: 10.1002/pon.3708. Epub 2014 Oct 24.
3
Reliability and validity of the Malayalam hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) in cancer patients.马拉雅拉姆语医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)在癌症患者中的信度和效度
Indian J Med Res. 2005 Nov;122(5):395-9.
4
[Occurrence of anxiety and depression disorders after acute cardiac events during hospital rehabilitation. Application of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale as a screening instrument].[急性心脏事件后在医院康复期间焦虑和抑郁障碍的发生情况。应用医院焦虑抑郁量表作为筛查工具]
Psychiatr Hung. 2008;23(6):430-43.
5
Psychometric properties of the Danish Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in patients with cardiac disease: results from the DenHeart survey.丹麦心脏病患者医院焦虑和抑郁量表的心理测量特性:DenHeart 调查结果。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Jan 7;18(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1264-0.
6
Factor structure and validity of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 in Swedish translation.瑞典语翻译版抑郁、焦虑和压力量表-21的因子结构与效度
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Mar;24(2-3):154-162. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12363. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
7
Is the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) a valid measure in a general population 65-80 years old? A psychometric evaluation study.医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)对65至80岁普通人群是否为有效测量工具?一项心理测量学评估研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Oct 4;15(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0759-9.
8
Quantitative analyses of factors related to anxiety and depression in patients with retinitis pigmentosa.定量分析与视网膜色素变性患者焦虑和抑郁相关的因素。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 23;13(4):e0195983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195983. eCollection 2018.
9
Validation of the Hungarian translation of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.医院焦虑抑郁量表匈牙利语翻译的验证
Qual Life Res. 2006 May;15(4):761-6. doi: 10.1007/s11136-005-3627-8.
10
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: a pilot study to examine its latent structure and the link between psychological state and symptom severity in transient ischaemic attack patients.医院焦虑抑郁量表:一项关于短暂性脑缺血发作患者潜在结构及心理状态与症状严重程度之间联系的初步研究。
Psychol Health Med. 2016 Jul;21(5):632-8. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2015.1074711. Epub 2015 Aug 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in cancer patients.癌症患者医院焦虑抑郁量表西班牙语版的心理测量特性。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 21;15:1497946. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1497946. eCollection 2024.
2
Six-month post-intensive care outcomes during high and low bed occupancy due to the COVID-19 pandemic: A multicenter prospective cohort study.因 COVID-19 大流行导致高床位占用率和低床位占用率情况下的重症监护后 6 个月结局:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 16;18(11):e0294631. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294631. eCollection 2023.
3
Predictors of Unmet Needs in Chilean Older People with Dependency: A Cross-Sectional Study.
智利依赖型老年人未满足需求的预测因素:一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Oct 16;20(20):6928. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20206928.
4
Prevalence of Depression and Anxiety Disorders Among Cancer Patients: An Insight From a Single Institute.癌症患者中抑郁症和焦虑症的患病率:来自单一机构的见解
Cureus. 2023 Aug 1;15(8):e42831. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42831. eCollection 2023 Aug.
5
Comparative efficacy of remotely delivered mindfulness-based eating awareness training versus behavioral-weight loss counseling during COVID-19.COVID-19期间远程提供的基于正念的饮食意识训练与行为减肥咨询的比较疗效
Front Psychol. 2023 May 17;14:1101120. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1101120. eCollection 2023.
6
Social relationships and relational pain in brain tumor patients and their partners.脑肿瘤患者及其伴侣的社会关系与关系性痛苦。
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2022 Oct 5;3:979758. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2022.979758. eCollection 2022.
7
The Relationship between Unmet Need, Physical Symptoms, Psychological Well-Being and Health-Related Quality of Life in Cholangiocarcinoma Survivors.胆管癌幸存者的未满足需求、身体症状、心理健康和健康相关生活质量之间的关系。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022 Aug 1;23(8):2821-2828. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.8.2821.
8
A Telehealth-Based Cognitive-Adaptive Training (e-OTCAT) to Prevent Cancer and Chemotherapy-Related Cognitive Impairment in Women with Breast Cancer: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.基于远程医疗的认知自适应训练(e-OTCAT)预防乳腺癌女性癌症和化疗相关认知障碍的随机对照试验方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 10;19(12):7147. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127147.
9
Global, regional, and national prevalence of depression among cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.癌症患者中抑郁症的全球、区域和国家患病率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Indian J Psychiatry. 2021 Nov-Dec;63(6):527-535. doi: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_77_21. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
10
Clinical Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Mexican Patients with Thoracic Malignancies.COVID-19 大流行对墨西哥胸癌患者的临床影响。
Oncologist. 2021 Dec;26(12):1035-1043. doi: 10.1002/onco.13962. Epub 2021 Sep 9.