• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老鼠、大鼠和人类对“沉没成本”的敏感性。

Sensitivity to "sunk costs" in mice, rats, and humans.

机构信息

Graduate Program in Neuroscience and Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.

Department of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.

出版信息

Science. 2018 Jul 13;361(6398):178-181. doi: 10.1126/science.aar8644.

DOI:10.1126/science.aar8644
PMID:30002252
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6377599/
Abstract

Sunk costs are irrecoverable investments that should not influence decisions, because decisions should be made on the basis of expected future consequences. Both human and nonhuman animals can show sensitivity to sunk costs, but reports from across species are inconsistent. In a temporal context, a sensitivity to sunk costs arises when an individual resists ending an activity, even if it seems unproductive, because of the time already invested. In two parallel foraging tasks that we designed, we found that mice, rats, and humans show similar sensitivities to sunk costs in their decision-making. Unexpectedly, sensitivity to time invested accrued only after an initial decision had been made. These findings suggest that sensitivity to temporal sunk costs lies in a vulnerability distinct from deliberation processes and that this distinction is present across species.

摘要

沉没成本是不可挽回的投资,不应该影响决策,因为决策应该基于预期的未来后果。人类和非人类动物都可以表现出对沉没成本的敏感性,但来自不同物种的报告并不一致。在时间背景下,当一个人因为已经投入的时间而抵制结束一项活动,即使它看起来没有成效,就会产生对沉没成本的敏感性。在我们设计的两个平行觅食任务中,我们发现老鼠、大鼠和人类在决策中表现出类似的对沉没成本的敏感性。出乎意料的是,只有在做出初始决策后,对时间投入的敏感性才会累积。这些发现表明,对时间沉没成本的敏感性存在于一种与深思熟虑过程不同的脆弱性中,而且这种区别存在于不同物种之间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/713b/6377599/8c62f0c0915b/nihms-1011225-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/713b/6377599/6847063fcb46/nihms-1011225-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/713b/6377599/c44566b4b7fe/nihms-1011225-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/713b/6377599/8c62f0c0915b/nihms-1011225-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/713b/6377599/6847063fcb46/nihms-1011225-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/713b/6377599/c44566b4b7fe/nihms-1011225-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/713b/6377599/8c62f0c0915b/nihms-1011225-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Sensitivity to "sunk costs" in mice, rats, and humans.老鼠、大鼠和人类对“沉没成本”的敏感性。
Science. 2018 Jul 13;361(6398):178-181. doi: 10.1126/science.aar8644.
2
Sunk cost sensitivity during change-of-mind decisions is informed by both the spent and remaining costs.改变主意决策中的沉没成本敏感性受到已花费成本和剩余成本的影响。
Commun Biol. 2022 Dec 7;5(1):1337. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-04235-6.
3
Sunk costs in the human brain.人类大脑中的沉没成本。
Neuroimage. 2014 Aug 15;97:127-33. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.036. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
4
Certainty and uncertainty of the future changes planning and sunk costs.未来变化的确定性和不确定性会影响规划和沉没成本。
Behav Neurosci. 2021 Aug;135(4):469-486. doi: 10.1037/bne0000460. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
5
Impact of past experiences on decision-making in autism spectrum disorder.过去的经验对自闭症谱系障碍决策的影响。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2020 Dec;270(8):1063-1071. doi: 10.1007/s00406-019-01071-4. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
6
The feeling of throwing good money after bad: The role of affective reaction in the sunk-cost fallacy.把好钱扔在坏的后面的感觉:情感反应在沉没成本谬误中的作用。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 8;14(1):e0209900. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209900. eCollection 2019.
7
Ketamine reverses stress-induced hypersensitivity to sunk costs.氯胺酮可逆转应激诱导的对沉没成本的超敏反应。
bioRxiv. 2024 May 14:2024.05.12.593597. doi: 10.1101/2024.05.12.593597.
8
Sunk costs under stress: Acute stress reduces the impact of past expenses on risky decisions.压力下的沉没成本:急性应激会降低过去的支出对风险决策的影响。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2022 Mar;137:105632. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2021.105632. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
9
Apparent sunk cost effect in rational agents.理性主体中的明显沉没成本效应。
Sci Adv. 2022 Feb 11;8(6):eabi7004. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abi7004.
10
Capuchin and rhesus monkeys show sunk cost effects in a psychomotor task.卷尾猴和恒河猴在一个心理运动任务中表现出沉没成本效应。
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 23;10(1):20396. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77301-w.

引用本文的文献

1
On the Low Reliability of Sunk Cost Vignettes.论沉没成本情景的低可靠性
Brain Sci. 2025 Jul 28;15(8):808. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15080808.
2
Individual differences in decision-making shape how mesolimbic dopamine regulates choice confidence and change-of-mind.决策过程中的个体差异塑造了中脑边缘多巴胺调节选择信心和改变想法的方式。
Nat Neurosci. 2025 Jul 30. doi: 10.1038/s41593-025-02015-z.
3
Opposing, multiplexed information in lateral and ventral orbitofrontal cortex guides sequential foraging decisions in rats.大鼠外侧和腹侧眶额皮质中相反的、多重的信息引导着顺序觅食决策。

本文引用的文献

1
Interplay between Hippocampal Sharp-Wave-Ripple Events and Vicarious Trial and Error Behaviors in Decision Making.海马体尖波涟漪事件与决策过程中替代性试错行为之间的相互作用。
Neuron. 2016 Dec 7;92(5):975-982. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.10.028. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
2
Rats value time differently on equivalent foraging and delay-discounting tasks.在同等的觅食和延迟折扣任务中,大鼠对时间的重视程度有所不同。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Sep;145(9):1093-101. doi: 10.1037/xge0000196. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
3
The sunk cost effect across species: A review of persistence in a course of action due to prior investment.
Neuron. 2025 Jul 9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2025.06.009.
4
Opposing, multiplexed information in lateral and ventral orbitofrontal cortex guides sequential foraging decisions in rats.大鼠外侧和腹侧眶额皮质中相反的、多重的信息引导着顺序觅食决策。
bioRxiv. 2025 May 7:2024.08.17.608409. doi: 10.1101/2024.08.17.608409.
5
Change-of-mind neuroeconomic decision-making is modulated by LINC00473 in medial prefrontal cortex in a sex-dependent manner.改变主意的神经经济决策受内侧前额叶皮质中LINC00473以性别依赖的方式调节。
Sci Adv. 2025 Jul 11;11(28):eadr3228. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adr3228.
6
Food-washing monkeys recognize the law of diminishing returns.清洗食物的猴子认识到收益递减规律。
Elife. 2025 May 22;13:RP98520. doi: 10.7554/eLife.98520.
7
Building momentum: A computational account of persistence toward long-term goals.蓄势待发:对追求长期目标的坚持的一种计算解释。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 May 14;21(5):e1013054. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013054. eCollection 2025 May.
8
Foraging animals use dynamic Bayesian updating to model meta-uncertainty in environment representations.觅食动物利用动态贝叶斯更新来对环境表征中的元不确定性进行建模。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 Apr 30;21(4):e1012989. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012989. eCollection 2025 Apr.
9
Neuroeconomically dissociable forms of mental accounting are altered in a mouse model of diabetes.在糖尿病小鼠模型中,神经经济学上可分离的心理账户形式发生了改变。
Commun Biol. 2025 Jan 21;8(1):102. doi: 10.1038/s42003-025-07500-6.
10
Individual differences in decision-making shape how mesolimbic dopamine regulates choice confidence and change-of-mind.决策过程中的个体差异塑造了中脑边缘多巴胺调节选择信心和改变想法的方式。
bioRxiv. 2024 Sep 16:2024.09.16.613237. doi: 10.1101/2024.09.16.613237.
跨物种的沉没成本效应:对因先前投资而在行动过程中持续坚持的综述。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2016 May;105(3):339-61. doi: 10.1002/jeab.202. Epub 2016 May 6.
4
The Web-Surf Task: A translational model of human decision-making.网络浏览任务:人类决策的一种转化模型。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2016 Feb;16(1):37-50. doi: 10.3758/s13415-015-0379-y.
5
The Computational Complexity of Valuation and Motivational Forces in Decision-Making Processes.决策过程中估值与动机力量的计算复杂性
Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2016;27:313-33. doi: 10.1007/7854_2015_375.
6
Hippocampal theta sequences reflect current goals.海马体θ序列反映当前目标。
Nat Neurosci. 2015 Feb;18(2):289-94. doi: 10.1038/nn.3909. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
7
Litter defence and parental investment allocation in house mice.家鼠的窝巢防御与亲代投资分配
Behav Processes. 1991 May;23(3):223-30. doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(91)90052-2.
8
Behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of regret in rat decision-making on a neuroeconomic task.大鼠在神经经济学任务中决策时的后悔行为和神经生理学相关性。
Nat Neurosci. 2014 Jul;17(7):995-1002. doi: 10.1038/nn.3740. Epub 2014 Jun 8.
9
Subjective costs drive overly patient foraging strategies in rats on an intertemporal foraging task.主观成本驱使大鼠在跨期觅食任务中采取过度的觅食策略。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 May 14;110(20):8308-13. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1220738110. Epub 2013 Apr 29.
10
Preference for the Outcome That Follows a Relatively Aversive Event: Contrast or Delay Reduction?对相对厌恶事件之后结果的偏好:对比还是延迟减少?
Learn Motiv. 2011 Aug 1;42(3):255-271. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2011.06.001.