Aenugu Sneha, O'Doherty John P
Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, United States of America.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 May 14;21(5):e1013054. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013054. eCollection 2025 May.
Extended goals necessitate extended commitment. We address how humans select between multiple goals in a temporally extended setting. We probe whether humans engage in prospective valuation of goals by estimating which goals are likely to yield future success and choosing those, or whether they rely on a less optimal retrospective strategy, favoring goals with greater accumulated progress even if less likely to result in success. To address this, we introduce a novel task in which goals need to be persistently selected until a set target is reached to earn an overall reward. In a series of experiments, we show that human goal selection involves a mix of prospective and retrospective influences, with an undue bias in favor of retrospective valuation. We show that a goal valuation model utilizing the concept of 'momentum', where progress accrued toward a goal builds value and persists across trials, successfully explains human behavior better than alternative frameworks. Our findings thus suggest an important role for momentum in explaining the valuation process underpinning human goal selection.
长远目标需要长期投入。我们探讨人类如何在时间跨度较长的情境中在多个目标之间进行选择。我们探究人类是否通过估计哪些目标可能带来未来的成功并选择这些目标来对目标进行前瞻性评估,或者他们是否依赖于不太理想的回顾性策略,即更青睐那些积累了更多进展的目标,即使这些目标实现成功的可能性较小。为了解决这个问题,我们引入了一项新颖的任务,在该任务中,需要持续选择目标,直到达到设定的目标以获得总体奖励。在一系列实验中,我们表明人类的目标选择涉及前瞻性和回顾性影响的混合,且过度偏向于回顾性评估。我们表明,一个利用“动量”概念的目标评估模型,即朝着一个目标积累的进展会产生价值并在试验中持续存在,比其他框架能更好地成功解释人类行为。因此,我们的研究结果表明动量在解释支撑人类目标选择的评估过程中起着重要作用。