• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗癫痫药物的认知和疲劳副作用:III 期附加试验分析。

Cognitive and fatigue side effects of anti-epileptic drugs: an analysis of phase III add-on trials.

机构信息

Division of Epilepsy and EEG, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Road - 4036, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.

Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Neurol. 2018 Sep;265(9):2137-2142. doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-8971-z. Epub 2018 Jul 12.

DOI:10.1007/s00415-018-8971-z
PMID:30003357
Abstract

We aimed to investigate the terms used to refer to cognitive and fatigue related side effects and their prevalence in phase III add-on clinical trials of anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs). We extracted data from publicly available FDA documents as well as the published literature. Target drug doses were then calculated as drug loads and divided into three categories (low, average, high). The odds ratio of developing the side effects was calculated for each drug load, and the presence of a dose-response effect was also assessed. We found that the cognitive terms used across trials were very variable, and data on discontinuation rates were limited. Placebo rates for cognitive side effects ranged from 0 to 10.6% while those for fatigue ranged from 2.5 to 37.7%. Keeping in mind the variable placebo rates and terminology, the majority of AEDs exhibited a clear dose response effect and significant odds ratios at high doses except brivaracetam and zonisamide for the cognitive side effects and tiagabine, topiramate, and zonisamide for the fatigue side effects. Due to their clinical relevance and impact on quality of life, new trials should make data related to the prevalence and discontinuation rates of these side effects publicly available. Given the clear dose response effect, physicians should consider aiming for lower drug loads and adjusting doses to improve tolerability.

摘要

我们旨在调查用于描述认知和疲劳相关副作用的术语及其在抗癫痫药物(AED)附加临床试验中的流行程度。我们从公开的 FDA 文件和已发表的文献中提取数据。然后将目标药物剂量计算为药物负荷并分为三类(低、中、高)。计算了每种药物负荷下出现副作用的比值比,并评估了剂量反应效应的存在。我们发现,试验中使用的认知术语非常多样,关于停药率的数据有限。认知副作用的安慰剂率范围为 0 至 10.6%,而疲劳的安慰剂率范围为 2.5 至 37.7%。考虑到可变的安慰剂率和术语,除了认知副作用的 brivaracetam 和 zonisamide 以及疲劳副作用的 tiagabine、topiramate 和 zonisamide 外,大多数 AED 都表现出明显的剂量反应效应和显著的比值比在高剂量下。由于这些副作用与生活质量密切相关且具有临床意义,新的试验应公开提供这些副作用的流行率和停药率相关数据。鉴于明确的剂量反应效应,医生应考虑降低药物负荷并调整剂量以提高耐受性。

相似文献

1
Cognitive and fatigue side effects of anti-epileptic drugs: an analysis of phase III add-on trials.抗癫痫药物的认知和疲劳副作用:III 期附加试验分析。
J Neurol. 2018 Sep;265(9):2137-2142. doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-8971-z. Epub 2018 Jul 12.
2
Tiagabine add-on for drug-resistant partial epilepsy.加用替加宾治疗耐药性部分性癫痫。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(3):CD001908. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001908.
3
Central nervous system adverse effects of new antiepileptic drugs. A meta-analysis of placebo-controlled studies.新型抗癫痫药物的中枢神经系统不良反应。安慰剂对照研究的荟萃分析。
Seizure. 2008 Jul;17(5):405-21. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2007.12.003. Epub 2008 Feb 8.
4
Clinical pharmacology of topiramate versus lamotrigine versus phenobarbital: comparison of efficacy and side effects using odds ratios.托吡酯与拉莫三嗪及苯巴比妥的临床药理学:采用比值比比较疗效和副作用
J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 May;43(5):491-503.
5
New antiepileptic drugs: a systematic review of their efficacy and tolerability.新型抗癫痫药物:对其疗效和耐受性的系统评价。
BMJ. 1996 Nov 9;313(7066):1169-74. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7066.1169.
6
[Zonisamide in the epilepsy treatment: a literature review from add-on therapy to monotherapy].[唑尼沙胺在癫痫治疗中的应用:从添加治疗到单药治疗的文献综述]
Rev Neurol. 2013 Apr 16;56(8):429-38.
7
Levetiracetam add-on for drug-resistant localization related (partial) epilepsy.左乙拉西坦添加治疗耐药性局灶性相关(部分性)癫痫。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(1):CD001901. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001901.
8
Tolerability of new antiepileptic drugs: a network meta-analysis.新型抗癫痫药物的耐受性:一项网状荟萃分析。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Jul;73(7):811-817. doi: 10.1007/s00228-017-2245-z. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
9
Psychiatric and cognitive adverse events: A pooled analysis of three phase III trials of adjunctive eslicarbazepine acetate for partial-onset seizures.精神和认知不良事件:醋酸艾司利卡西平辅助治疗部分性发作的三项III期试验的汇总分析。
Epilepsy Behav. 2018 May;82:119-127. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.12.017. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
10
Cognitive side-effects of antiepileptic drugs in children.抗癫痫药物对儿童的认知副作用。
Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;111:707-18. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-52891-9.00073-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Fatigue, sleep quality, depression symptoms, and antiseizure medication resistance in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy.新诊断癫痫患者的疲劳、睡眠质量、抑郁症状及抗癫痫药物耐药性
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2025 Mar 12;18:17562864251325338. doi: 10.1177/17562864251325338. eCollection 2025.
2
Association between glymphatic dysfunction and neurocognitive decline in patients with frontal lobe epilepsy.额叶癫痫患者的脑淋巴系统功能障碍与神经认知衰退之间的关联。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Sep 1;14(9):6745-6755. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-375. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
3
Protective effect of crocin-loaded nanoparticles in rats following epileptic seizures: Biochemical, behavioral and histopathological outcomes.

本文引用的文献

1
Adjunctive eslicarbazepine acetate: A pooled analysis of three phase III trials.辅助用醋酸艾司利卡西平:三项III期试验的汇总分析。
Epilepsy Behav. 2017 Jul;72:127-134. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.04.019. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
2
How can we overcome neuropsychological adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs?我们如何克服抗癫痫药物的神经心理学不良反应?
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2017 Apr;18(6):551-554. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2017.1309025. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
3
Cognitive effects of adjunctive perampanel for partial-onset seizures: A randomized trial.
载藏红花素纳米颗粒对癫痫发作后大鼠的保护作用:生化、行为及组织病理学结果
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 10;10(16):e36122. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36122. eCollection 2024 Aug 30.
4
Effect of Cenobamate on Cognition in Patients with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy with Focal Onset Seizures: An Exploratory Study.西尼莫德对伴有局灶性发作的耐药性癫痫患者认知功能的影响:一项探索性研究。
CNS Drugs. 2024 Feb;38(2):141-151. doi: 10.1007/s40263-024-01063-6. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
5
Using the hospital anxiety and depression scale in people with epilepsy: Is overlapping symptomatology a problem?在癫痫患者中使用医院焦虑抑郁量表:症状重叠是一个问题吗?
Epilepsy Behav Rep. 2023 Dec 23;25:100641. doi: 10.1016/j.ebr.2023.100641. eCollection 2024.
6
Interictal epileptiform discharges in Alzheimer's disease: prevalence, relevance, and controversies.阿尔茨海默病的发作间期癫痫样放电:患病率、相关性及争议
Front Neurol. 2023 Sep 21;14:1261136. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1261136. eCollection 2023.
7
Epilepsy and sleep characteristics are associated with diminished 24-h memory retention in older adults with epilepsy.癫痫和睡眠特征与老年癫痫患者 24 小时记忆保留减少有关。
Epilepsia. 2023 Oct;64(10):2771-2780. doi: 10.1111/epi.17707. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
8
A review of cognitive and behavioral outcomes of Brivaracetam.布瓦西坦的认知和行为结果的综述。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2023 Feb;39(2):104-114. doi: 10.1002/kjm2.12648. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
9
Glycyrrhizin regulates the HMGB1/P38MAPK signalling pathway in status epilepticus.甘草酸通过调控 HMGB1/P38MAPK 信号通路在癫痫持续状态中发挥作用。
Mol Med Rep. 2023 Feb;27(2). doi: 10.3892/mmr.2023.12932. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
10
Association of respiratory failure with inhibition of NaV1.6 in the phrenic nerve.呼吸衰竭与膈神经中 NaV1.6 抑制的关联。
Channels (Austin). 2022 Dec;16(1):230-243. doi: 10.1080/19336950.2022.2122309.
辅助用吡仑帕奈治疗部分性发作的认知效应:一项随机试验。
Epilepsia. 2016 Feb;57(2):243-51. doi: 10.1111/epi.13279. Epub 2016 Jan 1.
4
Safety and tolerability of lacosamide as adjunctive therapy for adults with partial-onset seizures: Analysis of data pooled from three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials.拉科酰胺作为成人部分性发作辅助治疗的安全性和耐受性:来自三项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验的汇总数据分析
Epilepsy Behav. 2015 Nov;52(Pt A):119-27. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.09.006. Epub 2015 Sep 27.
5
Adverse cognitive effects of antiepileptic pharmacotherapy: Each additional drug matters.抗癫痫药物治疗的不良认知影响:每增加一种药物都有影响。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015 Nov;25(11):1954-9. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.07.027. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
6
Topiramate and cognitive impairment: evidence and clinical implications.托吡酯与认知障碍:证据与临床意义。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2012 Dec;3(6):279-89. doi: 10.1177/2042098612455357.
7
Side-effects of antiepileptic drugs: the economic burden.抗癫痫药物的副作用:经济负担
Seizure. 2014 Mar;23(3):184-90. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2013.11.009. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
8
A review on antiepileptic drugs-dependent fatigue: pathophysiological mechanisms and incidence.抗癫痫药物所致疲劳的综述:病理生理机制与发病率
Eur J Pharmacol. 2013 Oct 15;718(1-3):10-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2013.09.013. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
9
Satisfaction with life domains in people with epilepsy.癫痫患者生活领域满意度。
Epilepsy Behav. 2012 Dec;25(4):546-51. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2012.09.013. Epub 2012 Nov 13.
10
Adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs.抗癫痫药物的不良反应。
Lancet Neurol. 2012 Sep;11(9):792-802. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70153-9. Epub 2012 Jul 24.