• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《压力之下:审视与计算机和机器人群体的社会从众行为》

Under Pressure: Examining Social Conformity With Computer and Robot Groups.

机构信息

George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia.

出版信息

Hum Factors. 2018 Dec;60(8):1207-1218. doi: 10.1177/0018720818788473. Epub 2018 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1177/0018720818788473
PMID:30004798
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The authors investigate whether nonhuman agents, such as computers or robots, produce a social conformity effect in human operators and examine to what extent potential conformist behavior varies as a function of the human-likeness of the group members and the type of task that has to be performed.

BACKGROUND

People conform due to normative and/or informational motivations in human-human interactions, and conformist behavior is modulated by factors related to the individual as well as factors associated with the group, context, and culture. Studies have yet to examine whether nonhuman agents also induce social conformity.

METHOD

Participants were assigned to a computer, robot, or human group and completed both a social and analytical task with the respective group.

RESULTS

Conformity measures (percentage of times participants answered in line with agents on critical trials) subjected to a 3 × 2 mixed ANOVA showed significantly higher conformity rates for the analytical versus the social task as well as a modulation of conformity depending of the perceived agent-task fit.

CONCLUSION

Findings indicate that nonhuman agents were able to exert a social conformity effect, which was modulated further by the perceived match between agent and task type. Participants conformed to comparable degrees with agents during the analytical task but conformed significantly more strongly on the social task as the group's human-likeness increased.

APPLICATION

Results suggest that users may react differently to the influence of nonhuman agent groups with the potential for variability in conformity depending on the domain of the task.

摘要

目的

作者研究了非人类代理,如计算机或机器人,是否会对人类操作员产生社会从众效应,并探讨潜在的从众行为在多大程度上会因群体成员的类人性和需要执行的任务类型而变化。

背景

在人与人之间的互动中,人们会出于规范和/或信息动机而从众,而从众行为会受到与个体相关的因素以及与群体、背景和文化相关的因素的调节。目前还没有研究非人类代理是否也会引起社会从众。

方法

参与者被分配到计算机、机器人或人类群体中,并与各自的群体一起完成了社交和分析任务。

结果

服从度测量(参与者在关键试验中与代理一致的次数占比)在 3×2 混合方差分析中显示,在分析任务与社交任务中,服从度明显更高,并且服从度取决于感知到的代理任务适配。

结论

研究结果表明,非人类代理能够产生社会从众效应,而且这种效应还受到代理与任务类型之间感知匹配的进一步调节。在分析任务中,参与者与代理的服从程度相当,但随着群体类人性的增加,在社交任务中,参与者的服从程度显著增强。

应用

研究结果表明,用户可能会对非人类代理群体的影响做出不同的反应,而且由于任务领域的不同,从众的潜在可变性。

相似文献

1
Under Pressure: Examining Social Conformity With Computer and Robot Groups.《压力之下:审视与计算机和机器人群体的社会从众行为》
Hum Factors. 2018 Dec;60(8):1207-1218. doi: 10.1177/0018720818788473. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
2
Social Conformity Effects on Trust in Simulation-Based Human-Robot Interaction.社会一致性对基于模拟的人机交互中信任的影响。
Hum Factors. 2019 Aug;61(5):805-815. doi: 10.1177/0018720818811190. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
3
The Relationship Between Trust and Use Choice in Human-Robot Interaction.人机交互中的信任与使用选择的关系。
Hum Factors. 2019 Jun;61(4):614-626. doi: 10.1177/0018720818816838. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
4
Good advice is beyond all price, but what if it comes from a machine?好的建议是无价的,但如果它来自机器呢?
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2019 Sep;25(3):386-395. doi: 10.1037/xap0000205. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
5
Effects of information source, pedigree, and reliability on operator interaction with decision support systems.信息来源、谱系及可靠性对操作员与决策支持系统交互的影响。
Hum Factors. 2007 Oct;49(5):773-85. doi: 10.1518/001872007X230154.
6
Preschoolers' conformity (and its motivation) is linked to own and parents' personalities.学龄前儿童的从众行为(及其动机)与他们自己以及父母的性格有关。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2018 Nov;36(4):573-588. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12243. Epub 2018 Mar 31.
7
Trust and the Compliance-Reliance Paradigm: The Effects of Risk, Error Bias, and Reliability on Trust and Dependence.信任与合规-依赖范式:风险、错误偏差和可靠性对信任与依赖的影响。
Hum Factors. 2017 May;59(3):333-345. doi: 10.1177/0018720816682648. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
8
A Little Anthropomorphism Goes a Long Way.些许拟人化作用巨大。
Hum Factors. 2017 Feb;59(1):116-133. doi: 10.1177/0018720816687205.
9
Not All Information Is Equal: Effects of Disclosing Different Types of Likelihood Information on Trust, Compliance and Reliance, and Task Performance in Human-Automation Teaming.并非所有信息都是平等的:在人机协作中披露不同类型可能性信息对信任、遵从和依赖的影响,以及对任务绩效的影响。
Hum Factors. 2020 Sep;62(6):987-1001. doi: 10.1177/0018720819862916. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
10
Children conform, adults resist: A robot group induced peer pressure on normative social conformity.儿童会顺应,成年人会抗拒:一个机器人群体引发了同伴压力对规范性社会顺应的影响。
Sci Robot. 2018 Aug 15;3(21). doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.aat7111.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of reciprocity in human-robot social influence.互惠在人机社会影响中的作用。
iScience. 2021 Nov 11;24(12):103424. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103424. eCollection 2021 Dec 17.
2
In search of a Goldilocks zone for credible AI.寻找可信人工智能的“金发姑娘区”。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 1;11(1):13687. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93109-8.
3
Robot Authority in Human-Robot Teaming: Effects of Human-Likeness and Physical Embodiment on Compliance.人机协作中的机器人权威:类人性与实体化对顺从性的影响
Front Psychol. 2021 May 31;12:625713. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.625713. eCollection 2021.
4
Bad machines corrupt good morals.坏机器会腐蚀良好的道德。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Jun;5(6):679-685. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01128-2. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
5
I know better! Emerging metacognition allows adolescents to ignore false advice.我懂得更多!新兴的元认知使青少年能够忽略错误的建议。
Dev Sci. 2021 Sep;24(5):e13101. doi: 10.1111/desc.13101. Epub 2021 Mar 8.