The MITRE Corporation, McLean, Virginia, USA.
University of Central Florida, Orlando, USA.
Hum Factors. 2019 Jun;61(4):614-626. doi: 10.1177/0018720818816838. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
To understand the influence of trust on use choice in human-robot interaction via experimental investigation.
The general assumption that trusting a robot leads to using that robot has been previously identified, often by asking participants to choose between manually completing a task or using an automated aid. Our work further evaluates the relationship between trust and use choice and examines factors impacting choice.
An experiment was conducted wherein participants rated a robot on a trust scale, then made decisions about whether to use that robotic agent or a human agent to complete a task. Participants provided explicit reasoning for their choices.
While we found statistical support for the "trust leads to use" relationship, qualitative results indicate other factors are important as well.
Results indicated that while trust leads to use, use is also heavily influenced by the specific task at hand. Users more often chose a robot for a dangerous task where loss of life is likely, citing safety as their primary concern. Conversely, users chose humans for the mundane warehouse task, mainly citing financial reasons, specifically fear of job and income loss for the human worker.
Understanding the factors driving use choice is key to appropriate interaction in the field of human-robot teaming.
通过实验研究了解信任对人机交互中使用选择的影响。
人们普遍认为信任机器人会导致使用机器人,这一观点通常通过让参与者在手动完成任务和使用自动化辅助工具之间做出选择来得到验证。我们的工作进一步评估了信任和使用选择之间的关系,并研究了影响选择的因素。
进行了一项实验,参与者在信任量表上对机器人进行评分,然后决定使用该机器人代理还是人类代理来完成任务。参与者为他们的选择提供了明确的理由。
虽然我们发现了“信任导致使用”关系的统计支持,但定性结果表明其他因素也很重要。
结果表明,尽管信任会导致使用,但使用也受到当前任务的强烈影响。用户更倾向于选择机器人来执行危险任务,因为机器人可能会导致生命损失,他们主要关注安全问题。相反,用户选择人类来执行平凡的仓库任务,主要是出于经济原因,特别是担心人类工人失业和收入损失。
了解驱动使用选择的因素是人机协作领域中适当交互的关键。