• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注意波动影响刺激表示的神经保真度和连接性。

Attentional Fluctuations Influence the Neural Fidelity and Connectivity of Stimulus Representations.

机构信息

VA Boston Healthcare System.

Harvard Medical School.

出版信息

J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Sep;30(9):1209-1228. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01306. Epub 2018 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1162/jocn_a_01306
PMID:30004852
Abstract

Attention is thought to facilitate both the representation of task-relevant features and the communication of these representations across large-scale brain networks. However, attention is not "all or none," but rather it fluctuates between stable/accurate (in-the-zone) and variable/error-prone (out-of-the-zone) states. Here we ask how different attentional states relate to the neural processing and transmission of task-relevant information. Specifically, during in-the-zone periods: (1) Do neural representations of task stimuli have greater fidelity? (2) Is there increased communication of this stimulus information across large-scale brain networks? Finally, (3) can the influence of performance-contingent reward be differentiated from zone-based fluctuations? To address these questions, we used fMRI and representational similarity analysis during a visual sustained attention task (the gradCPT). Participants ( n = 16) viewed a series of city or mountain scenes, responding to cities (90% of trials) and withholding to mountains (10%). Representational similarity matrices, reflecting the similarity structure of the city exemplars ( n = 10), were computed from visual, attentional, and default mode networks. Representational fidelity (RF) and representational connectivity (RC) were quantified as the interparticipant reliability of representational similarity matrices within (RF) and across (RC) brain networks. We found that being in the zone was characterized by increased RF in visual networks and increasing RC between visual and attentional networks. Conversely, reward only increased the RC between the attentional and default mode networks. These results diverge with analogous analyses using functional connectivity, suggesting that RC and functional connectivity in tandem better characterize how different mental states modulate the flow of information throughout the brain.

摘要

注意力被认为可以促进与任务相关的特征的表示,并在大脑的大规模网络中对这些表示进行交流。然而,注意力不是“全有或全无”的,而是在稳定/准确(在区域内)和可变/易出错(在区域外)状态之间波动。在这里,我们想知道不同的注意力状态如何与与任务相关的信息的神经处理和传输有关。具体来说,在区域内期间:(1)任务刺激的神经表示是否具有更高的保真度?(2)是否有更多的刺激信息在大脑的大规模网络中传播?最后,(3)能否区分基于区域的波动和与表现相关的奖励的影响?为了解决这些问题,我们在视觉持续注意力任务(gradCPT)期间使用 fMRI 和表示相似性分析。参与者(n=16)观看了一系列城市或山脉场景,对城市(90%的试验)做出反应,对山脉(10%)保持不反应。从视觉、注意力和默认模式网络中计算了反映城市样本相似性结构的表示相似性矩阵(n=10)。表示保真度(RF)和表示连接性(RC)被定义为表示相似性矩阵在(RF)和大脑网络之间(RC)的参与者间可靠性。我们发现,处于区域内的特点是视觉网络中的 RF 增加,视觉和注意力网络之间的 RC 增加。相反,奖励仅增加了注意力和默认模式网络之间的 RC。这些结果与使用功能连接的类似分析不同,这表明 RC 和功能连接可以更好地描述不同的心理状态如何调节信息在大脑中的流动。

相似文献

1
Attentional Fluctuations Influence the Neural Fidelity and Connectivity of Stimulus Representations.注意波动影响刺激表示的神经保真度和连接性。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Sep;30(9):1209-1228. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01306. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
2
Effects of task complexity and age-differences on task-related functional connectivity of attentional networks.任务复杂性和年龄差异对注意网络任务相关功能连接的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Jun;114:50-64. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.04.013. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
3
Attentional load modulates large-scale functional brain connectivity beyond the core attention networks.注意力负荷调节核心注意力网络之外的大规模功能性脑连接。
Neuroimage. 2015 Apr 1;109:260-72. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.026. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
4
Attending to What and Where: Background Connectivity Integrates Categorical and Spatial Attention.关注什么和哪里:背景连通性整合了类别和空间注意。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Sep;30(9):1281-1297. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01284. Epub 2018 May 23.
5
Dynamic Brain Network Correlates of Spontaneous Fluctuations in Attention.注意力自发波动的动态脑网络关联
Cereb Cortex. 2017 Mar 1;27(3):1831-1840. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhw029.
6
Visual search for object categories is predicted by the representational architecture of high-level visual cortex.对物体类别的视觉搜索是由高级视觉皮层的表征结构预测的。
J Neurophysiol. 2017 Jan 1;117(1):388-402. doi: 10.1152/jn.00569.2016. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
7
Predicting moment-to-moment attentional state.预测瞬息万变的注意力状态。
Neuroimage. 2015 Jul 1;114:249-56. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.032. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
8
States of Mind: Characterizing the Neural Bases of Focus and Mind-wandering through Dynamic Functional Connectivity.心理状态:通过动态功能连接来刻画专注和走神的神经基础。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Mar;29(3):495-506. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01066. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
9
Neural dynamics underlying varying attentional control facing invariant cognitive task upon invariant stimuli.面对不变刺激时执行不变认知任务过程中不同注意力控制背后的神经动力学。
Neuroscience. 2017 Jun 14;353:133-146. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.04.023. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
10
Altered intrinsic organisation of brain networks implicated in attentional processes in adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a resting-state study of attention, default mode and salience network connectivity.成人注意力缺陷多动障碍中涉及注意力过程的脑网络内在组织改变:一项关于注意力、默认模式和突显网络连接性的静息态研究
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2016 Jun;266(4):349-57. doi: 10.1007/s00406-015-0630-0. Epub 2015 Aug 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Learned saccade readiness varies with fluctuations in sustained attention.习得的扫视准备状态会随着持续注意力的波动而变化。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 23;15(1):31058. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14340-1.
2
Neural Representation Precision of Distance Predicts Children's Arithmetic Performance.距离的神经表征精度可预测儿童的算术表现。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2025 Mar;46(4):e70184. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70184.
3
An inclusive multivariate approach to neural localization of language components.一种包容的多变量方法,用于语言成分的神经定位。
Brain Struct Funct. 2024 Jun;229(5):1243-1263. doi: 10.1007/s00429-024-02800-9. Epub 2024 May 2.
4
The functional relevance of visuospatial processing speed across the lifespan.视空间加工速度在整个生命周期中的功能相关性。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 Aug 4;8(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00504-y.
5
The rise and fall of face recognition awareness across the life span.人脸识别意识在整个生命周期中的兴衰。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2023 Jan;49(1):22-33. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001069. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
6
An executive function subtype of PTSD with unique neural markers and clinical trajectories.创伤后应激障碍的执行功能亚型,具有独特的神经标记物和临床轨迹。
Transl Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 27;12(1):262. doi: 10.1038/s41398-022-02011-y.
7
The impact of image degradation and temporal dynamics on sustained attention.图像退化和时间动态对持续注意力的影响。
J Vis. 2022 Mar 2;22(4):8. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.4.8.
8
Evidence for a Specific Association Between Sustained Attention and Gait Speed in Middle-to-Older-Aged Adults.中老年成年人持续注意力与步速之间特定关联的证据。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2021 Jul 5;13:703434. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.703434. eCollection 2021.
9
Variable rather than extreme slow reaction times distinguish brain states during sustained attention.变量而非极端缓慢的反应时间区分了持续注意期间的大脑状态。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 21;11(1):14883. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94161-0.
10
Prediction of stimulus-independent and task-unrelated thought from functional brain networks.从功能脑网络预测刺激无关和任务无关的思维。
Nat Commun. 2021 Mar 19;12(1):1793. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22027-0.