VA Boston Healthcare System.
Harvard Medical School.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Sep;30(9):1209-1228. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01306. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
Attention is thought to facilitate both the representation of task-relevant features and the communication of these representations across large-scale brain networks. However, attention is not "all or none," but rather it fluctuates between stable/accurate (in-the-zone) and variable/error-prone (out-of-the-zone) states. Here we ask how different attentional states relate to the neural processing and transmission of task-relevant information. Specifically, during in-the-zone periods: (1) Do neural representations of task stimuli have greater fidelity? (2) Is there increased communication of this stimulus information across large-scale brain networks? Finally, (3) can the influence of performance-contingent reward be differentiated from zone-based fluctuations? To address these questions, we used fMRI and representational similarity analysis during a visual sustained attention task (the gradCPT). Participants ( n = 16) viewed a series of city or mountain scenes, responding to cities (90% of trials) and withholding to mountains (10%). Representational similarity matrices, reflecting the similarity structure of the city exemplars ( n = 10), were computed from visual, attentional, and default mode networks. Representational fidelity (RF) and representational connectivity (RC) were quantified as the interparticipant reliability of representational similarity matrices within (RF) and across (RC) brain networks. We found that being in the zone was characterized by increased RF in visual networks and increasing RC between visual and attentional networks. Conversely, reward only increased the RC between the attentional and default mode networks. These results diverge with analogous analyses using functional connectivity, suggesting that RC and functional connectivity in tandem better characterize how different mental states modulate the flow of information throughout the brain.
注意力被认为可以促进与任务相关的特征的表示,并在大脑的大规模网络中对这些表示进行交流。然而,注意力不是“全有或全无”的,而是在稳定/准确(在区域内)和可变/易出错(在区域外)状态之间波动。在这里,我们想知道不同的注意力状态如何与与任务相关的信息的神经处理和传输有关。具体来说,在区域内期间:(1)任务刺激的神经表示是否具有更高的保真度?(2)是否有更多的刺激信息在大脑的大规模网络中传播?最后,(3)能否区分基于区域的波动和与表现相关的奖励的影响?为了解决这些问题,我们在视觉持续注意力任务(gradCPT)期间使用 fMRI 和表示相似性分析。参与者(n=16)观看了一系列城市或山脉场景,对城市(90%的试验)做出反应,对山脉(10%)保持不反应。从视觉、注意力和默认模式网络中计算了反映城市样本相似性结构的表示相似性矩阵(n=10)。表示保真度(RF)和表示连接性(RC)被定义为表示相似性矩阵在(RF)和大脑网络之间(RC)的参与者间可靠性。我们发现,处于区域内的特点是视觉网络中的 RF 增加,视觉和注意力网络之间的 RC 增加。相反,奖励仅增加了注意力和默认模式网络之间的 RC。这些结果与使用功能连接的类似分析不同,这表明 RC 和功能连接可以更好地描述不同的心理状态如何调节信息在大脑中的流动。