Suppr超能文献

非药物干预治疗与衰老相关的直立性低血压的疗效。

The efficacy of nonpharmacologic intervention for orthostatic hypotension associated with aging.

机构信息

From the Institute of Cellular Medicine (J.L.N.), Newcastle University; Falls and Syncope Service (J.L.N., J.F.), Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; and NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre (J.F.), Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust and Newcastle University, UK.

出版信息

Neurology. 2018 Aug 14;91(7):e652-e656. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005994. Epub 2018 Jul 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy and safety of nonpharmacologic interventions for orthostatic hypotension (OH) secondary to aging.

METHODS

A total of 150 orthostatic challenges were performed in 25 older people (age 60-92 years) to determine cardiovascular responses to bolus water drinking, compression stockings, abdominal compression, and physical countermaneuvers. Primary outcome was response rate as assessed by proportion of participants whose systolic blood pressure (SBP) drop improved by ≥10 mm Hg.

RESULTS

The response rate to bolus water drinking was 56% (95% confidence interval [CI] 36.7-74.2), with standing SBP increasing by 12 mm Hg (95% CI 4-20). Physical countermaneuvers were efficacious in 44% (95% CI 25.8-63.3) but had little effect on standing SBP (+7.5 mm Hg [95% CI -1 to 16]). Abdominal compression was efficacious in 52% (95% CI 32.9-70.7) and improved standing SBP (+10 mm Hg [95% CI 2-18]). Compression stockings were the least efficacious therapy (32% [95% CI 16.1-51.4]) and had little effect on standing SBP (+6 mm Hg [95% CI -1, 13]). No intervention improved symptoms during standing. There were no adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Bolus water drinking should become the standard first-line nonpharmacologic intervention, whereas compression stockings should be disregarded in this population.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class III evidence that for older people with OH, bolus water drinking is superior to other nonpharmacologic interventions in decreasing SBP drop.

摘要

目的

确定非药物干预措施治疗与衰老相关的直立性低血压(OH)的疗效和安全性。

方法

对 25 名老年人(年龄 60-92 岁)进行了总共 150 次直立挑战,以确定对水冲击、压缩袜、腹部压迫和身体对抗性动作的心血管反应。主要结果是通过评估收缩压(SBP)下降改善≥10mmHg的参与者比例来评估反应率。

结果

水冲击的反应率为 56%(95%置信区间[CI] 36.7-74.2),站立 SBP 增加 12mmHg(95%CI 4-20)。身体对抗性动作在 44%(95%CI 25.8-63.3)有效,但对站立 SBP 的影响很小(增加 7.5mmHg [95%CI -1 至 16])。腹部压迫在 52%(95%CI 32.9-70.7)有效,并改善站立 SBP(增加 10mmHg [95%CI 2-18])。压缩袜是最无效的治疗方法(32%[95%CI 16.1-51.4]),对站立 SBP 的影响很小(增加 6mmHg [95%CI -1,13])。没有干预措施能改善站立时的症状。没有不良反应。

结论

水冲击应成为标准的一线非药物干预措施,而在该人群中应忽略使用压缩袜。

证据分类

本研究提供了 III 级证据,表明对于患有 OH 的老年人,水冲击在降低 SBP 下降方面优于其他非药物干预措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db3d/6105042/08c209406147/NEUROLOGY2017863324FF1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验