Department of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, 1025 East 7th Street, Suite 116, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, Kärki, Mattilanniemi 6, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014, Jyväskylä, Finland.
J Youth Adolesc. 2018 Sep;47(9):1966-1977. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0894-6. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
Friends provide important social contexts for student development. Research has shown that adolescent friends are similar to each other in their interest and values for different school subjects. Yet our current understanding does not extend to knowing whether selection, deselection, or socialization processes are responsible for this phenomena. Without this knowledge, it is very difficult for parents, teachers, and schools to know how and when to intervene. This study investigated selection, deselection, and socialization effects on adolescent students' task values for academic (languages, math and science, and social sciences) and non-academic subject areas (the arts and physical education). A social network approach was used to examine two waves of annual data collected from school-based networks of adolescents in the first and second years of high school education in Finland (N = 1419; female = 48.6%; mean age at first measurement point = 16). The results revealed that adolescents tended to select friends with similar levels of task values (friend selection) for the arts and physical education, but friends did not become more similar in these areas over time (friend socialization). In contrast, there was evidence of friend socialization, but not friend selection, for the academic school subjects. Across all subjects, differences in task values did not predict friendship dissolution (friend deselection). These findings suggest that to a significant extent, students make agentic choices in developing friendship with schoolmates based on their task values in non-academic subjects. The resultant friend contexts that individuals created, in turn, affected their task values in academic subject areas. These results shed light on the complexity of friend effect mechanisms on task values at the subject domain-specific level.
朋友为学生的发展提供了重要的社交环境。研究表明,青少年朋友在不同学科的兴趣和价值观上彼此相似。然而,我们目前的认识还无法确定是选择、排除还是社会化过程导致了这种现象。没有这些知识,家长、教师和学校就很难知道如何以及何时进行干预。本研究调查了选择、排除和社会化对青少年学生对学术(语言、数学和科学以及社会科学)和非学术学科领域(艺术和体育教育)的任务价值观的影响。本研究采用社会网络方法,对芬兰高中一、二年级学生基于学校的网络在两年间进行的年度数据(N=1419;女性=48.6%;第一次测量时的平均年龄=16 岁)进行了分析。结果表明,青少年倾向于选择在艺术和体育教育方面具有相似任务价值观的朋友(朋友选择),但朋友在这些领域的相似程度并没有随着时间的推移而增加(朋友社会化)。相比之下,在学术学科领域存在朋友社会化的证据,但没有朋友选择的证据。在所有科目中,任务价值观的差异并没有预测友谊的破裂(朋友排除)。这些发现表明,在很大程度上,学生根据自己在非学术科目中的任务价值观,自主选择与同学建立友谊。个体由此创建的朋友关系环境反过来又影响了他们在学术科目的任务价值观。这些结果揭示了朋友对任务价值观的影响机制在学科特定领域的复杂性。