• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年西班牙人群中 Tilburg 衰弱指标的心理测量学特性。

Psychometric properties of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator in older Spanish people.

机构信息

Unidad de Investigación de Atención Primaria-OSIS Gipuzkoa, Osakidetza, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Biodonostia, San Sebastián, Spain; Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Spain; Centro de Investigación en Cronicidad Kronikgune, Barakaldo, Spain.

Unidad de Investigación, Hospital Costa del Sol, Marbella, Spain; Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Spain.

出版信息

Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 Sep-Oct;78:203-212. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2018.05.024. Epub 2018 Jun 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.archger.2018.05.024
PMID:30007234
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) is a 15-item scale. It diagnoses frailty in the elderly based on three domains: physical, psychological and social. A Spanish cross-cultural adaptation and its psychometric properties are presented here.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Independent, non-institutionalized ≥70 year-olds were recruited. The TFI structure was assessed with Kuder-Richardson (KR-20) and confirmatory factor analyses. Sperman´s correlations (r) with Timed Up-and-Go, Self-assessed-health, Fried criteria, Short Physical Performance Battery, Gerontopole Frailty tool, assessed convergent validity. Known groups' validity and test-retest reliability were tested.

RESULTS

Based on n = 856 participants, domain and total scale KR-20 were <0.70. The social domain and certain physical items did not fit adequately. Most physical and total scaler were 0.31-0.48. Social domain r were <0.30. The TFI differentiated frail and no-frail subjects, but test-retest variation was considerable.

DISCUSSION

TFI applicability at different social contexts and frailty stages are worth of additional study. Certain scale aspects should be reconsidered.

摘要

背景

Tilburg 虚弱指数(TFI)是一个包含 15 个项目的量表。它基于身体、心理和社会三个领域来诊断老年人的虚弱程度。本文呈现了其西班牙语跨文化适应性及其心理测量学特性。

材料和方法

招募了独立的、非机构化的≥70 岁的老年人。使用 Kuder-Richardson(KR-20)和验证性因子分析评估 TFI 结构。Timed Up-and-Go、自我评估健康、Fried 标准、简短体能表现电池、Gerontopole 虚弱工具评估与收敛效度的斯皮尔曼相关系数(r)。测试了已知组的有效性和重测信度。

结果

基于 n=856 名参与者,领域和总量表 KR-20<0.70。社会领域和某些身体项目的拟合效果不佳。大多数身体和总量表的 r 值在 0.31-0.48 之间。社会领域的 r 值<0.30。TFI 可以区分虚弱和非虚弱的受试者,但重测变异相当大。

讨论

TFI 在不同的社会背景和虚弱阶段的适用性值得进一步研究。某些量表方面需要重新考虑。

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator in older Spanish people.老年西班牙人群中 Tilburg 衰弱指标的心理测量学特性。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 Sep-Oct;78:203-212. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2018.05.024. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
2
Psychometric analysis of the Arabic (Saudi) Tilburg Frailty Indicator among Saudi community-dwelling older adults.沙特社区居住的老年人群中,阿拉伯语(沙特)Tilburg 衰弱指标的心理测量学分析。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2020 Sep-Oct;90:104128. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2020.104128. Epub 2020 May 29.
3
Tilburg frailty indicator. German translation and psychometric testing.蒂尔堡衰弱指标。德语翻译及心理测量测试。
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2016 Feb;49(2):86-93. doi: 10.1007/s00391-015-0889-9. Epub 2015 May 8.
4
Deepening the understanding of the structural validity of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator.深化对蒂尔堡虚弱指标结构有效性的理解。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023 Jun;35(6):1263-1271. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02407-w. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
5
Portuguese version of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator: Transcultural adaptation and psychometric validation.蒂尔堡衰弱指标的葡萄牙语版本:跨文化调适与心理测量学验证。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015 Aug;15(8):951-60. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12373. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
6
The Tilburg Frailty Indicator: psychometric properties.特利尔虚弱指数:心理测量特性。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2010 Jun;11(5):344-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2009.11.003. Epub 2010 May 8.
7
Psychometric adequacy of the persian adapted version of the tilburg frailty indicator (P-TFI).波斯语适应版提尔堡虚弱指标(P-TFI)的心理计量学适宜性。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jul 21;24(1):623. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05161-4.
8
Psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Tilburg frailty indicator (TFI).巴西版蒂尔堡虚弱指标(TFI)的心理测量学特性。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2013 Jul-Aug;57(1):39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2013.03.001. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
9
Reliability and validity of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) among Chinese community-dwelling older people.蒂尔堡衰弱指标(TFI)在中国社区居住老年人中的信度和效度
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2017 Nov;73:21-28. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
10
Validity and Reliability of the Polish Version of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI).蒂尔堡衰弱指标(TFI)波兰语版本的效度与信度
J Frailty Aging. 2016;5(1):27-32. doi: 10.14283/jfa.2015.66.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of Frailty Indices Based on Sociodemographic and Clinical Determinants in Older Women.基于社会人口统计学和临床决定因素的老年女性衰弱指数分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 23;13(15):1791. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13151791.
2
The impact of humanising hospital care on health outcomes: an observational study protocol.人性化医院护理对健康结局的影响:一项观察性研究方案。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Apr 28;24(1):463. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03105-w.
3
Comprehensive Gerontological Assessment: An Update on the Concept and Its Evaluation Tools in Latin America and the Caribbean-A Literature Review.
综合老年医学评估:拉丁美洲和加勒比地区概念及其评估工具的最新情况——文献综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Dec 19;21(12):1697. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121697.
4
Translation and Validation of the Swedish Version of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator.《蒂尔堡衰弱指标瑞典语版本的翻译与验证》
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 16;11(16):2309. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11162309.
5
To validate the integral conceptual model of frailty among community-dwelling older adults in China: a cross-sectional study.验证中国社区居住的老年人虚弱整体概念模型:一项横断面研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Apr 21;23(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03960-9.
6
Deepening the understanding of the structural validity of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator.深化对蒂尔堡虚弱指标结构有效性的理解。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023 Jun;35(6):1263-1271. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02407-w. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
7
Factors related to early readmissions after acute heart failure: a nested case-control study.急性心力衰竭后早期再入院的相关因素:一项巢式病例对照研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023 Jan 12;23(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-03029-2.
8
Effects of a Structured Multicomponent Physical Exercise Intervention on Quality of Life and Biopsychosocial Health among Chilean Older Adults from the Community with Controlled Multimorbidity: A Pre-Post Design.结构化多组分体育锻炼干预对控制多重共病的智利社区老年人群生活质量和生物心理社会健康的影响:一项前后设计。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 28;19(23):15842. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315842.
9
Groningen Frailty Indicator-Chinese (GFI-C) for pre-frailty and frailty assessment among older people living in communities: psychometric properties and diagnostic accuracy.格罗宁根虚弱指数-中文(GFI-C)用于评估社区中老年人的虚弱前期和虚弱状态:心理测量特性和诊断准确性。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Oct 7;22(1):788. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03437-1.
10
Depression and Cognition Mediate the Effect of Self-Perceptions of Aging Over Frailty Among Older Adults Living in the Community in China.在中国社区老年人中,抑郁和认知介导衰老自我认知对衰弱的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 16;13:830667. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.830667. eCollection 2022.