Cardali Salvatore Massimiliano, Cacciola Fabio, Raffa Giovanni, Conti Alfredo, Caffo Maria, Germanò Antonino
Division of Neurosurgery, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2018 Apr-Jun;9(2):107-115. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_45_18.
Different surgical techniques have been described for treatment of degenerative lumbar stenosis (DLS). Only postoperative measures have been identified as predictors of efficacy of decompression. The objective of this study is to assess the role of navigated unilateral laminotomy with crossover to achieve and predict a satisfying decompression and outcome in DLS.
We enrolled patients with DLS who underwent navigation-assisted unilateral laminotomy with crossover. The extent of decompression was evaluated during surgery using neuronavigation. The outcome was assessed through the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) for leg pain. Outcome correlation with the extent of the intraoperative bone decompression was analyzed. Finally, the outcome, surgical time, and in-hospital length-of-stay were compared with a control group treated through standard unilateral laminotomy.
Twenty-five patients were treated using the navigated technique (Group A), 25 using the standard unilateral laminotomy (Group B). In Group A, a cut-off value ≥0.9 cm for bone decompression revealed to be an intraoperative predictor of good outcome, both regarding the ODI and VAS scores ( = 0.0005; = 0.002). As compared with Group B, patients operated using the navigated technique showed similar operative times, in-hospital length-of-stay, ODI scores, but improved VAS scores for leg pain ( = 0.04).
The intraoperative navigated evaluation of the bone decompression could predict the outcome allowing satisfactory results in unilateral laminotomy for DLS. The navigated technique also could lead to an improved decompression of lateral recesses resulting in better control of leg pain as compared to standard unilateral laminotomy.
已描述了多种用于治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症(DLS)的手术技术。仅术后指标被确定为减压效果的预测因素。本研究的目的是评估导航下单侧椎板切开术并交叉操作在DLS中实现并预测满意减压效果及预后的作用。
我们纳入了接受导航辅助下单侧椎板切开术并交叉操作的DLS患者。术中使用神经导航评估减压范围。通过Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)和腿痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估预后。分析预后与术中骨减压范围的相关性。最后,将预后、手术时间和住院时间与通过标准单侧椎板切开术治疗的对照组进行比较。
25例患者采用导航技术治疗(A组),25例采用标准单侧椎板切开术治疗(B组)。在A组中,骨减压≥0.9 cm的截断值显示是ODI和VAS评分良好预后的术中预测指标( = 0.0005; = 0.002)。与B组相比,采用导航技术手术的患者手术时间、住院时间、ODI评分相似,但腿痛的VAS评分有所改善( = 0.04)。
术中对骨减压的导航评估可以预测预后,使DLS单侧椎板切开术获得满意结果。与标准单侧椎板切开术相比,导航技术还可改善侧隐窝减压,更好地控制腿痛。