Chen Xuanyu, Lou Ning, Ruan Anming, Qiu Bin, Yan Yun, Wang Xuegang, Du Quansheng, Ruan Hailong, Han Weiwei, Wei Haibin, Yang Hongmei, Zhang Xiaoping
Department of Urology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430022, P.R. China.
Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310014, P.R. China.
Oncol Lett. 2018 Aug;16(2):1666-1674. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.8874. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
Biomarkers to guide the clinical treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are not yet routinely available. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have been demonstrated to serve as biomarkers for a number of types of cancer. Based on a previous study by this group, we hypothesize that several highly differentially expressed miRNAs may serve as tissue and plasma biomarkers in patients with RCC. The expression levels of miR-210, miR-224 and miR-141 were analyzed in tissue samples from the same cohort of 78 patients with RCC, in paired pre- and post-operative plasma samples from 66 patients with clear cell RCC (ccRCC) and in 67 healthy controls by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy associated with the expression of miR-210, miR-224 and miR-141. ROC curves revealed that the diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve) of tissue miR-210, miR-224, the ratio of miR-210/miR-141 (miR), miR-224/miR-141 (miR) and miR-210× miR-224/miR-141 (miR) in ccRCC was 0.8329, 0.8511, 0.9412, 0.9898 and 0.9771, respectively. Notably, miR demonstrated the highest accuracy among these miRNAs for discriminating ccRCC tissues from normal tissues, with a sensitivity of 97.06% and a specificity of 98.53%. The expression levels of plasma miR-210 and miR-224 were significantly increased in patients compared with healthy control patients, and were reduced postoperatively (P<0.05). The diagnostic accuracy of plasma miR-210 and miR-224 were 0.6775 (89.55% sensitivity and 48.48% specificity) and 0.6056 (88.06% sensitivity and 40.91% specificity), respectively. The present study indicated that the tissue miR-224/miR-141 ratio is a potentially powerful tool for detecting ccRCC. However, plasma miR-210 and miR-224 may not be associated with diagnosis of ccRCC.
目前尚无用于指导肾细胞癌(RCC)患者临床治疗的生物标志物。微小RNA(miRNA)已被证明可作为多种癌症类型的生物标志物。基于该研究团队之前的一项研究,我们推测几种高度差异表达的miRNA可能作为RCC患者的组织和血浆生物标志物。通过逆转录定量聚合酶链反应,分析了来自78例RCC患者同一队列的组织样本、66例透明细胞肾细胞癌(ccRCC)患者术前和术后配对的血浆样本以及67例健康对照中miR-210、miR-224和miR-141的表达水平。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估与miR-210、miR-224和miR-141表达相关的诊断准确性。ROC曲线显示,ccRCC组织中miR-210、miR-224、miR-210/miR-141(miR)、miR-224/miR-141(miR)和miR-210×miR-224/miR-141(miR)的诊断准确性(曲线下面积)分别为0.8329、0.8511、0.9412、0.9898和0.9771。值得注意的是,在这些miRNA中,miR在区分ccRCC组织与正常组织方面准确性最高,灵敏度为97.06%,特异性为98.53%。与健康对照患者相比,患者血浆中miR-210和miR-224的表达水平显著升高,且术后降低(P<0.05)。血浆miR-210和miR-224的诊断准确性分别为0.6775(灵敏度89.55%,特异性48.48%)和0.6056(灵敏度88.06%,特异性40.91%)。本研究表明,组织miR-224/miR-141比值是检测ccRCC的潜在有力工具。然而,血浆miR-210和miR-224可能与ccRCC的诊断无关。