• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Treatment of stable intertrochanteric fractures of the femur with proximal femoral nail versus dynamic hip screw: a comparative study.股骨近端髓内钉与动力髋螺钉治疗股骨转子间稳定型骨折的对比研究
Rev Bras Ortop. 2017 Nov 8;53(4):477-481. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2017.07.008. eCollection 2018 Jul-Aug.
2
Proximal femoral nails antirotation, Gamma nails, and dynamic hip screws for fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of femur: A meta-analysis.股骨近端抗旋髓内钉、Gamma钉和动力髋螺钉治疗股骨转子间骨折的Meta分析
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014 Dec;100(8):859-66. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.07.023. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
3
[Comparative study of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation and dynamic hip screw in the unstable intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly].老年不稳定型股骨转子间骨折中股骨近端抗旋髓内钉与动力髋螺钉的对比研究
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018 Jan 30;98(5):357-361. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2018.05.008.
4
Conversion to total hip arthroplasty after failed proximal femoral nail antirotations or dynamic hip screw fixations for stable intertrochanteric femur fractures: a retrospective study with a minimum follow-up of 3 years.股骨近端防旋髓内钉或动力髋螺钉固定稳定型股骨转子间骨折失败后改行全髋关节置换术:一项至少随访3年的回顾性研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jan 25;18(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1415-6.
5
[Effectiveness of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation combined with minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis versus Intertan intramedullary nail fixation in treatment of intertrochanteric fracture with incomplete lateral wall].股骨近端防旋髓内钉联合微创经皮钢板接骨术与Intertan髓内钉固定治疗外侧壁不完整的股骨转子间骨折的疗效比较
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Sep 15;34(9):1085-1090. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202001071.
6
Proximal femoral nails anti-rotation versus dynamic hip screws for treatment of stable intertrochanteric femur fractures: an outcome analyses with a minimum 4 years of follow-up.股骨近端抗旋髓内钉与动力髋螺钉治疗稳定型股骨转子间骨折的疗效分析:至少4年随访结果
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 May 21;17:222. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1079-7.
7
Surgical and Functional Outcomes of the Results of Conventional Two-Screw Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN) Versus Helical-Blade Anti-rotation Proximal Femoral Nail (PFNA2).传统双螺钉股骨近端髓内钉(PFN)与螺旋刀片抗旋股骨近端髓内钉(PFNA2)手术及功能结果对比
Cureus. 2023 Aug 18;15(8):e43698. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43698. eCollection 2023 Aug.
8
In reply to the letter to the editor regarding "Comparison of a twin interlocking derotation and compression screw cephalomedullary nail (InterTAN) with a single screw derotation cephalomedullary nail (proximal femoral nail antirotation): a systematic review and meta-analysis for intertrochanteric fractures".针对“双交叉锁定旋转和压缩螺钉股骨近端髓内钉(InterTAN)与单螺钉旋转复位股骨近端髓内钉(股骨近端防旋钉)治疗转子间骨折的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析”的来信回复。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Jul 16;17(1):354. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03244-9.
9
Does augmentation of intramedullary nails by a buttress plate effectively restore lateral wall integrity in intertrochanteric fractures.髓内钉加用支撑钢板能否有效地恢复转子间骨折的外侧壁完整性。
Int Orthop. 2022 Oct;46(10):2365-2371. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05488-w. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
10
A biomechanical comparison of proximal femoral nails and locking proximal anatomic femoral plates in femoral fracture fixation: A study on synthetic bones.股骨近端髓内钉与锁定解剖型股骨近端钢板在股骨骨折固定中的生物力学比较:一项基于人工骨的研究
Indian J Orthop. 2015 May-Jun;49(3):347-51. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.156220.

引用本文的文献

1
Dynamic hip screw versus proximal femoral nailing in stable intertrochanteric fractures: a systematic review of efficacy and outcomes.动力髋螺钉与股骨近端髓内钉治疗稳定型股骨转子间骨折的疗效及结果系统评价
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jul 30;26(1):736. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-09005-z.
2
Anterior Plate Supplemented Proximal Femoral Nail for Comminuted 4-part Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture with the Coronal Splitting of Greater Trochanter: A Case Report.前路钢板辅助股骨近端髓内钉治疗合并大转子冠状面劈裂的粉碎性股骨转子间四部分骨折:1例报告
J Orthop Case Rep. 2025 Jul;15(7):65-72. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i07.5770.
3
Comparing Intramedullary Nails versus Dynamic Hip Screws in the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures on Post-operative Rehabilitation Outcomes - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.髓内钉与动力髋螺钉治疗股骨转子间骨折术后康复效果的比较——一项系统评价与Meta分析
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2025 Jun 17;16:21514593251350490. doi: 10.1177/21514593251350490. eCollection 2025.
4
A Prospective, Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing the use of the Proximal Femoral Nail - Antirotation and Dynamic Hip Screw for Stable Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures-Stable Trochanteric Fractures Intramedullary versus Extramedullary (STRIVE) Study.一项比较股骨近端防旋髓内钉与动力髋螺钉治疗稳定型股骨转子间骨折的前瞻性随机对照试验——稳定型转子间骨折髓内与髓外(STRIVE)研究
Malays Orthop J. 2025 Mar;19(1):86-95. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.2503.011.
5
Complication Rates in Intertrochanteric Fractures: A Database Analysis Comparing Sliding Hip Screw and Cephalomedullary Nail.股骨转子间骨折的并发症发生率:一项比较滑动髋螺钉和髓内钉的数据库分析
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2024;12(7):506-514. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2024.64188.3081.
6
A Comparative Study of Dynamic Hip Screws and Proximal Femoral Nails in Intertrochanteric Fractures.动力髋螺钉与股骨近端髓内钉治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的比较研究
Cureus. 2024 Apr 26;16(4):e59063. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59063. eCollection 2024 Apr.
7
Angle-Adjustable Dynamic Hip Screw Plate for Unstable Trochanteric Fractures in Middle-Aged Patients: Mid-Term Outcomes and Return to Sport.用于中年患者不稳定型转子间骨折的角度可调动力髋螺钉钢板:中期结果及恢复运动情况
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 8;13(4):988. doi: 10.3390/jcm13040988.
8
Factors associated with postoperative quality of life in patients with intertrochanteric fracture.股骨转子间骨折患者术后生活质量的相关因素
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Dec 11;86(2):703-711. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001608. eCollection 2024 Feb.
9
Does intramedullary nail have advantages over dynamic hip screw for the treatment of AO/OTA31A1-A3? A meta-analysis.交锁髓内钉治疗 AO/OTA31A1-A3 型骨折是否优于动力髋螺钉?一项荟萃分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Jul 18;24(1):588. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06715-0.
10
The development, incidence and treatment trends of trochanteric fractures in Germany: a cohort study.德国转子骨折的发展、发病率及治疗趋势:一项队列研究
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Jul 10;18(1):491. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03981-5.

本文引用的文献

1
[Comparison of proximal femoral nail and dynamic hip screw for treating intertrochanteric fractures].股骨近端髓内钉与动力髋螺钉治疗股骨转子间骨折的比较
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2009 Jul;22(7):535-7.
2
[Pertrochanteric fractures: a randomized prospective study comparing dynamic screw plate and intramedullary fixation].[转子间骨折:一项比较动力加压钢板与髓内固定的随机前瞻性研究]
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2005 Dec;91(8):732-6. doi: 10.1016/s0035-1040(05)84484-8.
3
Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.用于成人髋关节囊外骨折的伽马钉及其他髁上髓内钉与髓外植入物的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD000093. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000093.pub3.
4
The fixion proximal femur nailing system: biomechanical properties of the nail and a cadaveric study.股骨近端锁定髓内钉系统:髓内钉的生物力学特性及尸体研究
J Biomech. 2005 Jan;38(1):63-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.03.014.
5
Complications following the treatment of trochanteric fractures with the gamma nail.使用伽马钉治疗转子骨折后的并发症。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004 Dec;124(10):692-8. doi: 10.1007/s00402-004-0744-8. Epub 2004 Oct 23.
6
Pertrochanteric fractures: is there an advantage to an intramedullary nail?: a randomized, prospective study of 206 patients comparing the dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail.转子周围骨折:髓内钉有优势吗?一项对206例患者进行的随机前瞻性研究,比较动力髋螺钉和股骨近端髓内钉。
J Orthop Trauma. 2002 Jul;16(6):386-93. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200207000-00004.
7
Unstable trochanteric fractures. A comparative analysis of four methods of internal fixation.不稳定型股骨转子间骨折。四种内固定方法的比较分析。
Acta Orthop Scand. 1980 Dec;51(6):949-62. doi: 10.3109/17453678008990900.
8
Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation.髋关节脱位及髋臼骨折后创伤性关节炎:采用模具成形术治疗。一项使用新结果评估方法的最终结果研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969 Jun;51(4):737-55.

股骨近端髓内钉与动力髋螺钉治疗股骨转子间稳定型骨折的对比研究

Treatment of stable intertrochanteric fractures of the femur with proximal femoral nail versus dynamic hip screw: a comparative study.

作者信息

Sharma Anmol, Sethi Anisha, Sharma Shardaindu

机构信息

Government Multispecialty Hospital, Chandigarh, India.

Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

Rev Bras Ortop. 2017 Nov 8;53(4):477-481. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2017.07.008. eCollection 2018 Jul-Aug.

DOI:10.1016/j.rboe.2017.07.008
PMID:30027082
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6052185/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with stable intertrochanteric fractures treated with proximal femoral nail vs. dynamic hip screw.

METHODS

Sixty patients with stable intertrochanteric fractures, aged over 18 years, were randomly divided into the proximal femoral nail and dynamic hip screw groups. Dynamic hip screw with a three-hole side-plate and an anti-rotation screw were used, as well as a modified ultra-short proximal femoral nail for the smaller Asian population. The intra-operative, early and late complications were recorded, and the functional outcome of each group was assessed using the Harris Hip Score.

RESULTS

In the dynamic hip screw group, the one-month mean Harris Hip Score was slightly lower than that of the proximal femoral nail group. However, at the three- and six-month monthly follow-ups, the dynamic hip screw group presented higher mean scores than the proximal femoral nail group; at the one-year follow-up, both the groups attained similar scores.

CONCLUSION

Proximal femoral nail provides a significantly shorter surgery with a smaller incision that leads to less wound-related complications. However, the incidence of technical errors was significantly higher in proximal femoral nail when compared with dynamic hip screw as it is a technically more demanding surgery that leads to more implant failures and the consequent re-operations.

摘要

目的

评估并比较采用股骨近端髓内钉与动力髋螺钉治疗稳定型股骨转子间骨折患者的临床和影像学结果。

方法

60例年龄超过18岁的稳定型股骨转子间骨折患者被随机分为股骨近端髓内钉组和动力髋螺钉组。使用带有三孔侧板和防旋螺钉的动力髋螺钉,以及针对体型较小的亚洲人群改良的超短型股骨近端髓内钉。记录术中、早期和晚期并发症,并使用Harris髋关节评分评估每组的功能结果。

结果

在动力髋螺钉组中,1个月时的平均Harris髋关节评分略低于股骨近端髓内钉组。然而,在3个月和6个月的随访中,动力髋螺钉组的平均评分高于股骨近端髓内钉组;在1年随访时,两组评分相似。

结论

股骨近端髓内钉手术时间明显更短,切口更小,导致与伤口相关的并发症更少。然而,与动力髋螺钉相比,股骨近端髓内钉技术失误的发生率明显更高,因为它是一项技术要求更高的手术,会导致更多的植入物失败以及随后的再次手术。