• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

景观特征对文化生态系统服务提供的重要性。

The importance of landscape characteristics for the delivery of cultural ecosystem services.

机构信息

NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BB, UK.

NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BB, UK; School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, PO Box 217, Reading, Berkshire RG6 6AH, UK.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2018 Jan 15;206:1145-1154. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.066. Epub 2017 Dec 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.066
PMID:30029348
Abstract

The importance of Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) to human wellbeing is widely recognised. However, quantifying these non-material benefits is challenging and consequently they are often not assessed. Mapping approaches are increasingly being used to understand the spatial distribution of different CES and how this relates to landscape characteristics. This study uses an online Public Participation Geographic Information System (PPGIS) to elicit information on outdoor locations important to respondents in Wiltshire, a dynamic lowland landscape in southern England. We analysed these locations in a GIS with spatial datasets representing potential influential factors, including protected areas, land use, landform, and accessibility. We assess these characteristics at different spatial and visual scales for different types of cultural engagement. We find that areas that are accessible, near to urban centres, with larger views, and a high diversity of protected habitats, are important for the delivery of CES. Other characteristics including a larger area of woodland and the presence of sites of historic interest in the surrounding landscape were also influential. These findings have implications for land-use planning and the management of ecosystems, by demonstrating the benefits of high quality ecological sites near to towns. The importance of maintaining and restoring landscape features, such as woodlands, to enhance the delivery of CES were also highlighted.

摘要

文化生态系统服务(CES)对人类福祉的重要性已得到广泛认可。然而,量化这些非物质效益具有挑战性,因此它们通常未被评估。制图方法越来越多地被用于了解不同 CES 的空间分布以及它们与景观特征的关系。本研究使用在线公众参与地理信息系统(PPGIS)来征集英格兰南部动态低地景观威尔特郡受访者认为重要的户外地点信息。我们在 GIS 中分析了这些地点,并使用代表潜在影响因素的空间数据集,包括保护区、土地利用、地形和可达性。我们评估了不同类型文化参与的不同空间和视觉尺度的这些特征。我们发现,可达性高、靠近城市中心、视野开阔、保护区内栖息地多样性高的地区,对 CES 的提供非常重要。周围景观中林地面积较大和历史名胜存在等其他特征也具有影响力。这些发现对土地利用规划和生态系统管理具有启示意义,表明了在城镇附近拥有高质量生态地的好处。还强调了维护和恢复景观特征(如林地)以增强 CES 提供的重要性。

相似文献

1
The importance of landscape characteristics for the delivery of cultural ecosystem services.景观特征对文化生态系统服务提供的重要性。
J Environ Manage. 2018 Jan 15;206:1145-1154. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.066. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
2
[Evaluation of ecosystem cultural services of urban protected areas based on public participation GIS (PPGIS): A case study of Gongqing Forest Park in Shanghai, China].基于公众参与式地理信息系统(PPGIS)的城市保护区生态系统文化服务评估:以上海共青森林公园为例
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2019 Feb 20;30(2):439-448. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201902.011.
3
Mapping and assessment of landscape aesthetic quality in Lithuania.立陶宛景观美学质量的制图与评估。
J Environ Manage. 2021 May 15;286:112239. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112239. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
4
[Landscape ecological planning of Jiaozuo city].[焦作市景观生态规划]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2005 Sep;16(9):1724-8.
5
Participatory mapping of cultural ecosystem services for landscape corridor planning: A case study of the Silk Roads corridor in Zhangye, China.参与式文化生态系统服务制图在景观廊道规划中的应用:以中国张掖丝绸之路廊道为例。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Jun 15;264:110458. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110458. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
6
Quantifying the visual-sensory landscape qualities that contribute to cultural ecosystem services using social media and LiDAR.利用社交媒体和激光雷达量化有助于文化生态系统服务的视觉感官景观特质。
Ecosyst Serv. 2018;31:326-335. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.03.022.
7
Mapping and assessing coastal recreation cultural ecosystem services supply, flow, and demand in Lithuania.立陶宛沿海休闲文化生态系统服务的供给、流动与需求的测绘和评估
J Environ Manage. 2022 Dec 1;323:116175. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116175. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
8
Mapping bundles of ecosystem services reveals distinct types of multifunctionality within a Swedish landscape.绘制生态系统服务束揭示了瑞典景观中不同类型的多功能性。
Ambio. 2015 Jan;44 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S89-101. doi: 10.1007/s13280-014-0601-0.
9
Assessing the influences of ecological restoration on perceptions of cultural ecosystem services by residents of agricultural landscapes of western China.评估生态恢复对中国西部农业景观居民文化生态系统服务感知的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Jan 1;646:685-695. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.205. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
10
[Spatial evaluation on ecological and aesthetic quality of Beijing agricultural landscape].[北京农业景观生态与美学质量的空间评价]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2009 Oct;20(10):2455-60.

引用本文的文献

1
Users' experiences of park accessibility and attractiveness based on online review analytics.基于在线评论分析的用户对公园可达性和吸引力的体验。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 4;15(1):4268. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88500-8.
2
Identify the significant landscape characteristics for the perceived restorativeness of 8 perceived sensory dimensions in urban green space.识别城市绿地中8种感知感官维度的感知恢复力的显著景观特征。
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 28;10(7):e27925. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27925. eCollection 2024 Apr 15.
3
Explaining demographic-destination preferences for cultural ecosystem services: A set-theoretic configurational analysis.
解释文化生态系统服务的人口统计学目的地偏好:一种集理论构型分析。
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 26;10(3):e25054. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25054. eCollection 2024 Feb 15.
4
Effects of the spatial patterns of urban parks on public satisfaction: evidence from Shanghai, China.城市公园空间格局对公众满意度的影响:来自中国上海的证据
Landsc Ecol. 2023;38(5):1265-1277. doi: 10.1007/s10980-023-01615-z. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
5
What is attractive rural landscape? Differences in the social and expert assessment of the changes in the rural landscape of the Carpathian region in Poland with regard to the need of its protection.什么是吸引人的乡村景观?波兰喀尔巴阡地区乡村景观变化的社会和专家评估在其保护需求方面的差异。
J Mt Sci. 2023;20(2):501-515. doi: 10.1007/s11629-022-7377-7. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
6
Variable effects of vegetation characteristics on a recreation service depending on natural and social environment.植被特征对依赖于自然和社会环境的娱乐服务的可变影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 13;13(1):684. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-27799-7.
7
Electroencephalogram Application for the Analysis of Stress Relief in the Seasonal Landscape.脑电图在季节性景观压力缓解分析中的应用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 12;18(16):8522. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168522.
8
The Construction and Validation of a Sustainable Tourism Development Evaluation Model.构建与验证可持续旅游发展评价模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 7;17(19):7306. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197306.
9
Evaluating Cultural Ecosystem Services of Urban Residential Green Spaces From the Perspective of Residents' Satisfaction With Green Space.从居民对绿地满意度的角度评价城市居住绿地的文化生态系统服务。
Front Public Health. 2020 Jul 17;8:226. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00226. eCollection 2020.