• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与式文化生态系统服务制图在景观廊道规划中的应用:以中国张掖丝绸之路廊道为例。

Participatory mapping of cultural ecosystem services for landscape corridor planning: A case study of the Silk Roads corridor in Zhangye, China.

机构信息

Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 23, 1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.

Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 23, 1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2020 Jun 15;264:110458. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110458. Epub 2020 Mar 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110458
PMID:32250892
Abstract

Cultural landscape corridors provide opportunities for recreation and other cultural ecosystem services (CES). Currently, many local governments are preparing cultural landscape corridor (CLC) proposals along China's Silk Roads, which include many notable features of historical human activity and communication between different cultures. However, public values and perceptions of these projects have been largely excluded from the planning processes. This study presents a spatial pattern analysis of public perceptions of the impact of a CLC in Zhangye, China. CES were used as a framework for participatory mapping, interviews, and a structured survey of public perceptions, and correspondence analysis was used to identify resident perceptions of the corridor's expected impact, especially as related to CES. Our results show that aesthetic values, cultural heritage values, and recreation were valued most highly. These values varied according to respondents' employment and land-use rights. The riverside was the most highest-valued area for CES. Respondents expressed concerns about the project's potentially negative impact, especially on the spiritual values of land. These concerns could be the source of conflict during project implementation. We conclude that linking participatory mapping with CES has the potential to improve corridor proposals and assist in the management of conflicts between planners and public stakeholders.

摘要

文化景观廊道为休闲娱乐和其他文化生态系统服务(CES)提供了机会。目前,许多地方政府正在沿中国丝绸之路沿线准备文化景观廊道(CLC)提案,其中包括许多历史人类活动和不同文化之间交流的著名特征。然而,这些项目的公众价值和认知在很大程度上被排除在规划过程之外。本研究展示了对中国张掖文化景观廊道影响的公众认知的空间模式分析。CES 被用作参与式制图、访谈和公众认知的结构化调查的框架,并且使用对应分析来识别居民对走廊预期影响的认知,特别是与 CES 相关的影响。我们的研究结果表明,审美价值、文化遗产价值和娱乐价值最为重要。这些价值观根据受访者的就业和土地使用权而有所不同。河畔是 CES 价值最高的区域。受访者对项目可能产生的负面影响表示担忧,特别是对土地精神价值的影响。这些担忧可能是项目实施过程中冲突的根源。我们得出的结论是,将参与式制图与 CES 相结合,有可能改善廊道提案,并有助于规划者和公众利益相关者之间的冲突管理。

相似文献

1
Participatory mapping of cultural ecosystem services for landscape corridor planning: A case study of the Silk Roads corridor in Zhangye, China.参与式文化生态系统服务制图在景观廊道规划中的应用:以中国张掖丝绸之路廊道为例。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Jun 15;264:110458. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110458. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
2
[Evaluation of ecosystem cultural services of urban protected areas based on public participation GIS (PPGIS): A case study of Gongqing Forest Park in Shanghai, China].基于公众参与式地理信息系统(PPGIS)的城市保护区生态系统文化服务评估:以上海共青森林公园为例
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2019 Feb 20;30(2):439-448. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201902.011.
3
Assessing the influences of ecological restoration on perceptions of cultural ecosystem services by residents of agricultural landscapes of western China.评估生态恢复对中国西部农业景观居民文化生态系统服务感知的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Jan 1;646:685-695. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.205. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
4
How do landscape patterns in urban parks affect multiple cultural ecosystem services perceived by residents?城市公园景观格局如何影响居民感知的多种文化生态系统服务?
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Oct 10;946:174255. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174255. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
5
The importance of landscape characteristics for the delivery of cultural ecosystem services.景观特征对文化生态系统服务提供的重要性。
J Environ Manage. 2018 Jan 15;206:1145-1154. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.066. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
6
Mapping and assessing coastal recreation cultural ecosystem services supply, flow, and demand in Lithuania.立陶宛沿海休闲文化生态系统服务的供给、流动与需求的测绘和评估
J Environ Manage. 2022 Dec 1;323:116175. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116175. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
7
Identifying the Spatial Imbalance in the Supply and Demand of Cultural Ecosystem Services.识别文化生态系统服务供需的空间失衡。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 30;19(11):6661. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116661.
8
Factors affecting cultural ecosystem services use in Vilnius (Lithuania): A participatory mapping survey approach.影响立陶宛维尔纽斯文化生态系统服务利用的因素:一种参与式绘图调查方法。
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 7;9(4):e15384. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15384. eCollection 2023 Apr.
9
Investigating the potential impact of ecological restoration strategies on people-landscape interactions through cultural ecosystem services: A case study of Xilin Gol, China.通过文化生态系统服务研究生态恢复策略对人地相互作用的潜在影响:以中国锡林郭勒为例。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Aug 15;316:115185. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115185. Epub 2022 May 6.
10
National assessment of cultural ecosystem services: Participatory mapping in Switzerland.国家文化生态系统服务评估:瑞士的参与式绘图。
Ambio. 2019 Oct;48(10):1219-1233. doi: 10.1007/s13280-018-1138-4. Epub 2019 Jan 5.

引用本文的文献

1
A social-ecological approach for identifying and mapping ecosystem service trade-offs and conservation priorities in peri-urban areas.一种用于识别和绘制城市周边地区生态系统服务权衡和保护重点的社会生态方法。
Ambio. 2024 Oct;53(10):1522-1540. doi: 10.1007/s13280-024-02031-6. Epub 2024 May 10.