• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

立陶宛沿海休闲文化生态系统服务的供给、流动与需求的测绘和评估

Mapping and assessing coastal recreation cultural ecosystem services supply, flow, and demand in Lithuania.

作者信息

Inácio Miguel, Gomes Eduardo, Bogdzevič Katažyna, Kalinauskas Marius, Zhao Wenwu, Pereira Paulo

机构信息

Environmental Management Laboratory, Mykolas Romeris University, Vilnius, Lithuania.

Environmental Management Laboratory, Mykolas Romeris University, Vilnius, Lithuania; Centre for Geographical Studies, Institute of Geography and Spatial Planning, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal; Associated Laboratory TERRA, Lithuania.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2022 Dec 1;323:116175. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116175. Epub 2022 Sep 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116175
PMID:36088764
Abstract

Coastal recreation as a cultural ecosystem service (CES) is key to human wellbeing. However, anthropogenic impacts at the coast affect CES supply. Mapping and assessing CES can help achieve better coastal planning and management of the coast. Quantitative approaches for assessing and mapping CES are lacking, especially in coastal areas. We develop three quantitative models to assess and map coastal recreation CES supply, flow, and demand. We applied the developed models in the coastal region of Lithuania. The coastal recreation CES supply model comprises natural (e.g., naturalness) and cultural (e.g., points of interest) components. The input variables were (1) analysed for multicollinearity, (2) normalised and (3) overlayed using ArcGIS 10.8. An online survey was undertaken to assess and map CES flow and demand based on locations chosen by respondents where they perform recreation at the coast and the number of activities performed when visiting the coast. The coastal recreation CES supply model results showed that natural recreation is close to the coastline, forest areas, waterlines, and protected areas, while cultural recreation is highest in coastal urban areas. The supply model was validated (r = 0.11) based on the respondents' chosen coastal locations for recreation. The low validation allowed us to identify the mismatch between model results and respondents' preferences occurring in Klaipėda urban area. When removing respondents' points in Klaipeda urban area, the model validation increased (r = 0.36). CES flow results highlighted Palanga, Šventoji, and Nida as the prime coastal recreation locations. The results of CES demand show that respondents living in municipalities near the coastline (Baltic Sea and Curonian Lagoon) perform fewer activities when visiting the coast. For other municipalities, a demand pattern was not observed. Our results yielded important spatial information that can be useful for planners and decision-makers in the context of coastal management.

摘要

沿海休闲作为一种文化生态系统服务(CES),对人类福祉至关重要。然而,海岸地区的人为影响会影响CES的供给。绘制和评估CES有助于实现更好的海岸规划和海岸管理。目前缺乏评估和绘制CES的定量方法,尤其是在沿海地区。我们开发了三个定量模型来评估和绘制沿海休闲CES的供给、流动和需求。我们在立陶宛沿海地区应用了所开发的模型。沿海休闲CES供给模型包括自然(如自然度)和文化(如景点)成分。对输入变量进行了以下处理:(1)分析多重共线性,(2)标准化,(3)使用ArcGIS 10.8进行叠加。开展了一项在线调查,以根据受访者选择的在海岸进行休闲活动的地点以及访问海岸时进行的活动数量来评估和绘制CES流动和需求情况。沿海休闲CES供给模型的结果表明,自然休闲活动靠近海岸线、森林地区、水线和保护区,而文化休闲活动在沿海城市地区最为集中。基于受访者选择的沿海休闲地点对供给模型进行了验证(r = 0.11)。验证度较低,这使我们能够识别在克莱佩达市区模型结果与受访者偏好之间存在的不匹配情况。去除克莱佩达市区受访者的点后,模型验证度提高(r = 0.36)。CES流动结果突出显示帕兰加、什温托伊和尼达是主要的沿海休闲地点。CES需求结果表明,居住在靠近海岸线(波罗的海和库尔斯沙嘴泻湖)市镇的受访者在访问海岸时进行的活动较少。对于其他市镇,未观察到需求模式。我们的结果产生了重要的空间信息,这对于海岸管理背景下的规划者和决策者可能有用。

相似文献

1
Mapping and assessing coastal recreation cultural ecosystem services supply, flow, and demand in Lithuania.立陶宛沿海休闲文化生态系统服务的供给、流动与需求的测绘和评估
J Environ Manage. 2022 Dec 1;323:116175. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116175. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
2
Mapping and assessment of recreational cultural ecosystem services supply and demand in Vilnius (Lithuania).立陶宛维尔纽斯市休闲文化生态系统服务供需的制图与评估。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jan 10;855:158590. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158590. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
3
Mapping and assessment of future changes in the coastal and marine ecosystem services supply in Lithuania.立陶宛沿海和海洋生态系统服务供给未来变化的制图与评估。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Mar 15;812:152586. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152586. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
4
Factors affecting cultural ecosystem services use in Vilnius (Lithuania): A participatory mapping survey approach.影响立陶宛维尔纽斯文化生态系统服务利用的因素:一种参与式绘图调查方法。
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 7;9(4):e15384. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15384. eCollection 2023 Apr.
5
Mapping wild seafood potential, supply, flow and demand in Lithuania.立陶宛野生海鲜潜力、供应、流动和需求图。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 May 20;718:137356. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137356. Epub 2020 Feb 16.
6
Mapping and assessment of landscape aesthetic quality in Lithuania.立陶宛景观美学质量的制图与评估。
J Environ Manage. 2021 May 15;286:112239. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112239. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
7
Identifying the Spatial Imbalance in the Supply and Demand of Cultural Ecosystem Services.识别文化生态系统服务供需的空间失衡。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 30;19(11):6661. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116661.
8
Cultural ecosystem services provided by the Baltic Sea marine environment.波罗的海海洋环境提供的文化生态系统服务。
Ambio. 2019 Nov;48(11):1350-1361. doi: 10.1007/s13280-019-01239-1. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
9
Assessing the Impact of Marine Tourism and Protection on Cultural Ecosystem Services Using Integrated Approach: A Case Study of Gili Matra Islands.采用综合方法评估海洋旅游和保护对文化生态系统服务的影响:以吉利马塔群岛为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 24;19(19):12078. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912078.
10
Embedding ecosystem services in coastal planning leads to better outcomes for people and nature.将生态系统服务纳入沿海规划可为人类和自然带来更好的结果。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jun 16;112(24):7390-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1406483112. Epub 2015 Jun 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Modelling monetary and non-monetary flows of recreational ecosystem services in Germany.德国休闲生态系统服务货币流与非货币流建模。
Ambio. 2025 Feb;54(2):270-284. doi: 10.1007/s13280-024-02081-w. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
2
The promotion of sustainable land use planning for the enhancement of ecosystem service capacity: Based on the FLUS-INVEST-RUSLE-CASA model.促进可持续土地利用规划以提高生态系统服务能力:基于 FLUS-INVEST-RUSLE-CASA 模型。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 9;19(7):e0305400. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305400. eCollection 2024.
3
Rapid and simultaneous multiepitope antigen-based detection of by microscale thermophoresis and immunomagnetic separation.
通过微尺度热泳和免疫磁分离对基于多表位抗原进行快速同步检测。 (原句似乎不完整,“of”后面缺少具体检测对象)
Front Microbiol. 2024 Jan 23;15:1341451. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1341451. eCollection 2024.
4
Frameworks for mapping lake ecosystem services. An example from Lithuania.湖泊生态系统服务映射框架。立陶宛的一个例子。
MethodsX. 2023 Jan 13;10:102015. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2023.102015. eCollection 2023.