Department of Biochemistry and Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
Genome Science and Technology Program, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018 Sep 17;84(19). doi: 10.1128/AEM.01139-18. Print 2018 Oct 1.
How enzymes behave in cells is likely different from how they behave in the test tube. Previous studies find that osmolytes interact weakly with folate. Removal of the osmolyte from the solvation shell of folate is more difficult than removal of water, which weakens binding of folate to its enzyme partners. To examine if this phenomenon occurs , osmotic stress titrations were performed with Two strategies were employed: resistance to an antibacterial drug and complementation of a knockout strain by the appropriate gene cloned into a plasmid that allows tight control of expression levels as well as labeling by a degradation tag. The abilities of the knockout and complemented strains to grow under osmotic stress were compared. Typically, the knockout strain could grow to high osmolalities on supplemented medium, while the complemented strain stopped growing at lower osmolalities on minimal medium. This pattern was observed for an R67 dihydrofolate reductase clone rescuing a Δ strain, for a methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase clone rescuing a Δ strain, and for a serine hydroxymethyltransferase clone rescuing a Δ strain. Additionally, an R67 dihydrofolate reductase clone allowed DH5α to grow in the presence of trimethoprim until an osmolality of ∼0.81 is reached, while cells in a control titration lacking antibiotic could grow to 1.90 osmol. can survive in drought and flooding conditions and can tolerate large changes in osmolality. However, the cell processes that limit bacterial growth under high osmotic stress conditions are not known. In this study, the dose of four different enzymes in was decreased by using deletion strains complemented by the gene carried in a tunable plasmid. Under conditions of limiting enzyme concentration (lower than that achieved by chromosomal gene expression), cell growth can be blocked by osmotic stress conditions that are normally tolerated. These observations indicate that has evolved to deal with variations in its osmotic environment and that normal protein levels are sufficient to buffer the cell from environmental changes. Additional factors involved in the osmotic pressure response may include altered protein concentration/activity levels, weak solute interactions with ligands which can make it more difficult for proteins to bind their substrates/inhibitors/cofactors , and/or viscosity effects.
酶在细胞中的行为可能与在试管中的行为不同。先前的研究发现,渗透剂与叶酸弱相互作用。从叶酸的溶剂化壳中去除渗透剂比去除水更困难,这削弱了叶酸与其酶伴侣的结合。为了检查这种现象是否发生,进行了渗透压滴定实验,采用了两种策略:对一种抗菌药物的抗性和通过克隆到允许紧密控制表达水平以及通过降解标记进行标记的质粒中的适当基因对敲除菌株进行互补。比较了敲除菌株和互补菌株在渗透压应激下的生长能力。通常,敲除菌株可以在补充培养基上生长到高渗透压,而互补菌株在最低培养基上生长到较低渗透压时停止生长。这种模式观察到 R67 二氢叶酸还原酶克隆拯救Δ菌株,亚甲基四氢叶酸还原酶克隆拯救Δ菌株,以及丝氨酸羟甲基转移酶克隆拯救Δ菌株。此外,R67 二氢叶酸还原酶克隆允许 DH5α 在甲氧苄啶存在下生长,直到达到约 0.81 的渗透压,而对照滴定中不含抗生素的细胞可以生长到 1.90 渗透压。能够在干旱和洪水条件下存活,并能耐受渗透压的大幅变化。然而,在高渗透压条件下限制细菌生长的细胞过程尚不清楚。在这项研究中,使用由可调节质粒携带的基因互补的缺失菌株来降低四种不同酶在中的剂量。在酶浓度有限的条件下(低于染色体基因表达达到的水平),细胞生长可以被正常耐受的渗透压条件所阻断。这些观察结果表明,已经进化到能够应对其渗透压环境的变化,并且正常的蛋白质水平足以缓冲细胞免受环境变化的影响。参与渗透压响应的其他因素可能包括改变蛋白质浓度/活性水平、渗透剂与配体的弱相互作用,这使得蛋白质更难与其底物/抑制剂/辅助因子结合,和/或粘度效应。